From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Shi Subject: Re: bltk-game regressions on snb laptop Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:54:07 +0800 Message-ID: <516FB4AF.6060009@intel.com> References: <516CFA57.3060709@intel.com> <516F42EE.6080802@intel.com> <516F81BD.3030306@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:35350 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966803Ab3DRIyo (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Apr 2013 04:54:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Linux PM list , "Brown, Len" , "Wysocki, Rafael J" , Arjan van de Ven , LKP ML On 04/18/2013 01:37 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: >>> About your system: Can you give output of cpufreq-info for v3.8 and >>> >> v3.9-latestrc? >>> >> Your cpus share a clock line or not? >> > >> > Yes our cpu shares a clock line. So the cpufreq-info is same. SNB CPU >> > p-state is per cpu package, and hardware will coordinate the software >> > asking, then decide which cpufreq should be. > Can you paste cpufreq-info output, that will give us a better picture of your > system. > at the most of time with your patch cpufreq-info is 0.8GHz, without the patch, the cpufreq is varied from 1.0 to 2.8 Ghz. -- Thanks Alex