linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Taras Kondratiuk <taras@ti.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: lgirdwood@gmail.com, rjw@sisk.pl, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
	shawn.guo@linaro.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Philip Rakity <prakity@nvidia.com>,
	Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>,
	"grygorii.strashko" <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
	Andrii Tseglytskyi <andrii.tseglytskyi@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] regulator: core: Add regulator_set_voltage_min()
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 21:45:09 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5176D6B5.3070305@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130423134512.GL5019@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

On 04/23/2013 04:45 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 02:44:58PM +0300, Taras Kondratiuk wrote:
>
>> GPU voltage is regulated by some devfreq driver.
>> CPU voltage is regulated by generic cpufreq-cpu0 driver.
>> Both drivers know only about their operational points.
>> They don't know anything about chip limits.
> Clearly at least the lower bound is known to the drivers...
Do you mean a voltage of the lowest operation point?

>
>> I see two options here:
>> 1. Pass somehow chip limits to drivers so they can limit their request.
>>     Pros: No need for regulator_set_voltage_min()
>>     Cons: a) Need to pass info about chip limits to driver. New API?
> Why on earth would this need a new API?
I think I'm missing something.
How can I pass chip limits to a driver in some generic way?
>
>>           b) CPU and GPU may have different limits,
>>              so after very first request voltage may violate
>>              CPU or GPU range.
> If the CPU and GPU drivers are trying to select incompatible
> configurations then we really ought to be detecting that, ignoring it
> seems like an obvious failure.  There's a bootstrapping problem but
> that's also an issue with specifying only the minimum voltage...
>
>> 2. Define chip limits in Reg X constraints.
>>     Pros: Limits will be applied to driver's request transparently.
>>           No need to pass info about limits to driver.
>>           Limits are set before the first request, so no violation.
>>     Cons: regulator_set_voltage_min() is needed.
>> IMHO option #2 is better.
>> Do you see other ways?
> Above you clearly say that this is all modelling operating points.  If
> you're doing that then I would expect the drivers to be talking
> operating points to an operating point abstraction.
I went through several SoC datasheets and found that min approach
won't work for some of them (like AM335x).
The only safe way is to send max OPP voltage as a max_uV.
So please skip this series.

-- 
BR
Taras Kondratiuk | GlobalLogic


  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-23 18:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-19 11:55 [RFC PATCH 0/2] cpufreq/regulator: Limit minimum voltage only Taras Kondratiuk
2013-04-19 11:55 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] regulator: core: Add regulator_set_voltage_min() Taras Kondratiuk
2013-04-22 13:19   ` Mark Brown
2013-04-22 16:49     ` Taras Kondratiuk
2013-04-23  8:48       ` Mark Brown
2013-04-23 11:44         ` Taras Kondratiuk
2013-04-23 13:45           ` Mark Brown
2013-04-23 18:45             ` Taras Kondratiuk [this message]
2013-04-24  9:38               ` Mark Brown
2013-04-19 11:55 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: Limit minimum voltage only Taras Kondratiuk
2013-04-19 16:21 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] cpufreq/regulator: " Nishanth Menon
2013-04-20  0:24   ` Kondratiuk, Taras
2013-04-22  6:11     ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2013-04-22 13:25       ` Mark Brown
2013-04-22 16:25       ` Taras Kondratiuk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5176D6B5.3070305@ti.com \
    --to=taras@ti.com \
    --cc=andrii.tseglytskyi@ti.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=eric.y.miao@gmail.com \
    --cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=prakity@nvidia.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).