From: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
To: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, rui.zhang@intel.com,
tony.luck@intel.com, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
eduardo.valentin@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86, mcheck, therm_throt: Process package thresholds
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 15:28:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51913EE0.6060008@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1367953065-2729-2-git-send-email-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5775 bytes --]
On 07-05-2013 14:57, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> Added callback registration for package threshold reports. Also added
> a callback to check the rate control implemented in callback or not.
> If there is no rate control implemented, then there is a default rate
> control similar to core threshold notification by delaying for
> CHECK_INTERVAL (5 minutes) between reports.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h | 7 ++++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h
> index f4076af..4c619bf 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h
> @@ -214,6 +214,13 @@ void mce_log_therm_throt_event(__u64 status);
> /* Interrupt Handler for core thermal thresholds */
> extern int (*platform_thermal_notify)(__u64 msr_val);
>
> +/* Interrupt Handler for package thermal thresholds */
> +extern int (*platform_thermal_package_notify)(__u64 msr_val);
> +
> +/* Callback support of rate control, return true, if
> + * callback has rate control */
> +extern bool (*platform_thermal_package_rate_control)(void);
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_THERMAL_VECTOR
> extern void mcheck_intel_therm_init(void);
> #else
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c
> index 47a1870..28cecab 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c
> @@ -54,12 +54,24 @@ struct thermal_state {
> struct _thermal_state package_power_limit;
> struct _thermal_state core_thresh0;
> struct _thermal_state core_thresh1;
> + struct _thermal_state pkg_thresh0;
> + struct _thermal_state pkg_thresh1;
> };
>
> /* Callback to handle core threshold interrupts */
> int (*platform_thermal_notify)(__u64 msr_val);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(platform_thermal_notify);
>
> +/* Callback to handle core package threshold_interrupts */
> +int (*platform_thermal_package_notify)(__u64 msr_val);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(platform_thermal_package_notify);
How about EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL?
> +
> +/* Callback support of rate control, return true, if
> + * callback has rate control */
> +bool (*platform_thermal_package_rate_control)(void);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(platform_thermal_package_rate_control);
> +
ditto..
Are you sure this is a 1 to 1 notification system? Why not using
linux/notifier.h?
> +
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct thermal_state, thermal_state);
>
> static atomic_t therm_throt_en = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
> @@ -203,19 +215,25 @@ static int therm_throt_process(bool new_event, int event, int level)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int thresh_event_valid(int event)
> +static int thresh_event_valid(int level, int event)
> {
> struct _thermal_state *state;
> unsigned int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
> struct thermal_state *pstate = &per_cpu(thermal_state, this_cpu);
> u64 now = get_jiffies_64();
>
> - state = (event == 0) ? &pstate->core_thresh0 : &pstate->core_thresh1;
> + if (level == PACKAGE_LEVEL)
> + state = (event == 0) ? &pstate->pkg_thresh0 :
> + &pstate->pkg_thresh1;
> + else
> + state = (event == 0) ? &pstate->core_thresh0 :
> + &pstate->core_thresh1;
>
> if (time_before64(now, state->next_check))
> return 0;
>
> state->next_check = now + CHECK_INTERVAL;
> +
> return 1;
> }
>
> @@ -321,6 +339,39 @@ device_initcall(thermal_throttle_init_device);
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_SYSFS */
>
> +static void notify_package_thresholds(__u64 msr_val)
> +{
> + bool notify_thres_0 = false;
> + bool notify_thres_1 = false;
> +
> + if (!platform_thermal_package_notify)
> + return;
> +
> + /* lower threshold check */
> + if (msr_val & THERM_LOG_THRESHOLD0)
> + notify_thres_0 = true;
> + /* higher threshold check */
> + if (msr_val & THERM_LOG_THRESHOLD1)
> + notify_thres_1 = true;
> +
> + if (!notify_thres_0 && !notify_thres_1)
> + return;
> +
> + if (platform_thermal_package_rate_control &&
> + platform_thermal_package_rate_control()) {
> + /* Rate control is implemented in callback */
> + platform_thermal_package_notify(msr_val);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /* lower threshold reached */
> + if (notify_thres_0 && thresh_event_valid(PACKAGE_LEVEL, 0))
> + platform_thermal_package_notify(msr_val);
> + /* higher threshold reached */
> + if (notify_thres_1 && thresh_event_valid(PACKAGE_LEVEL, 1))
> + platform_thermal_package_notify(msr_val);
> +}
> +
> static void notify_thresholds(__u64 msr_val)
> {
> /* check whether the interrupt handler is defined;
> @@ -330,10 +381,12 @@ static void notify_thresholds(__u64 msr_val)
> return;
>
> /* lower threshold reached */
> - if ((msr_val & THERM_LOG_THRESHOLD0) && thresh_event_valid(0))
> + if ((msr_val & THERM_LOG_THRESHOLD0) &&
> + thresh_event_valid(CORE_LEVEL, 0))
> platform_thermal_notify(msr_val);
> /* higher threshold reached */
> - if ((msr_val & THERM_LOG_THRESHOLD1) && thresh_event_valid(1))
> + if ((msr_val & THERM_LOG_THRESHOLD1) &&
> + thresh_event_valid(CORE_LEVEL, 1))
> platform_thermal_notify(msr_val);
> }
>
> @@ -359,6 +412,8 @@ static void intel_thermal_interrupt(void)
>
> if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PTS)) {
> rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_PACKAGE_THERM_STATUS, msr_val);
> + /* check violations of package thermal thresholds */
> + notify_package_thresholds(msr_val);
> therm_throt_process(msr_val & PACKAGE_THERM_STATUS_PROCHOT,
> THERMAL_THROTTLING_EVENT,
> PACKAGE_LEVEL);
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 295 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-13 19:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-07 18:57 [PATCH 0/2] CPU Package temperarure thermal driver Srinivas Pandruvada
2013-05-07 18:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86, mcheck, therm_throt: Process package thresholds Srinivas Pandruvada
2013-05-13 19:28 ` Eduardo Valentin [this message]
2013-05-14 15:23 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2013-05-07 18:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] Thermal: CPU Package temperature thermal Srinivas Pandruvada
2013-05-13 19:30 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-05-14 16:39 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2013-05-13 15:01 ` [PATCH 0/2] CPU Package temperarure thermal driver Srinivas Pandruvada
2013-05-13 19:08 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-05-13 19:16 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-05-14 15:12 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51913EE0.6060008@ti.com \
--to=eduardo.valentin@ti.com \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox