From: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
To: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, rui.zhang@intel.com,
tony.luck@intel.com, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
eduardo.valentin@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Thermal: CPU Package temperature thermal
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 15:30:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51913F60.6060405@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1367953065-2729-3-git-send-email-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 22548 bytes --]
Hello Srinivas,
On 07-05-2013 14:57, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> This driver register CPU digital temperature sensor as a thermal
> zone at package level.
> Each package will show up as one zone with at max two trip points.
> These trip points can be both read and updated. Once a non zero
> value is set in the trip point, if the package package temperature
> goes above or below this setting, a thermal notification is
> generated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/Kconfig | 12 +
> drivers/thermal/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/thermal/x86_pkg_temp_thermal.c | 633 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 646 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/x86_pkg_temp_thermal.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/Kconfig b/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
> index a764f16..ed9b983 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
> @@ -165,4 +165,16 @@ config INTEL_POWERCLAMP
> enforce idle time which results in more package C-state residency. The
> user interface is exposed via generic thermal framework.
>
> +config X86_PKG_TEMP_THERMAL
> + tristate "X86 package temperature thermal driver"
> + depends on THERMAL
> + depends on X86
> + select THERMAL_GOV_USER_SPACE
I understand based on you patch 0/2 description, that this is a combined
solution, with the userspace thermal daemon.
Do you know if there is any limitation by using this driver with
existing in-kernel governors?
> + default m
> + help
> + Enable this to register CPU digital sensor for package temperature as
> + thermal zone. Each package will have its own thermal zone. There are
> + two trip points which can be set by user to get notifications via thermal
> + notification methods.
> +
> endif
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/Makefile b/drivers/thermal/Makefile
> index d3a2b38..fd137ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/Makefile
> @@ -21,4 +21,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_DOVE_THERMAL) += dove_thermal.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_DB8500_THERMAL) += db8500_thermal.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_DB8500_CPUFREQ_COOLING) += db8500_cpufreq_cooling.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_POWERCLAMP) += intel_powerclamp.o
> -
> +obj-$(CONFIG_X86_PKG_TEMP_THERMAL) += x86_pkg_temp_thermal.o
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/x86_pkg_temp_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/x86_pkg_temp_thermal.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..120ad39
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/x86_pkg_temp_thermal.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,633 @@
> +/*
> + * x86_pkg_temp_thermal driver
> + * Copyright (c) 2013, Intel Corporation.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> + * under the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License,
> + * version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope it will be useful, but WITHOUT
> + * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
> + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for
> + * more details.
> + *
> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with
> + * this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> + *
> + */
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
> +
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/param.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/cpu.h>
> +#include <linux/smp.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/pm.h>
> +#include <linux/thermal.h>
> +#include <asm/cpu_device_id.h>
> +#include <asm/mce.h>
> +#include <linux/debugfs.h>
nit: add first the includes starting with linux/, then those starting
with asm/.
> +
> +/*
> +* Rate control delay: Idea is to introduce denounce effect
> +* This should be long enough to avoid reduce events, when
> +* threshold is set to a temperature, which is constantly
> +* violated, but at the short enough to take any action.
> +* The action can be remove threshold or change it to next
> +* interesting setting. Based on experiments, in around
> +* every 5 seconds under load will give us a significant
> +* temperature change.
> +*/
> +#define PKG_TEMP_THERMAL_NOTIFY_DELAY msecs_to_jiffies(5000)
Shouldnt this be configurable? I d suggest to leave to system integrator
to optimize this, based on the fact that his is a worst case estimation,
as stated above.
> +
> +/* Number of trip points in thermal zone */
> +#define MAX_NUMBER_OF_TRIPS 2
> +
ditto..
> +struct phy_dev_entry {
> + struct list_head list;
> + u16 phys_proc_id;
> + u16 first_cpu;
> + u32 tj_max;
> + int ref_cnt;
> + u32 start_pkg_therm_low;
> + u32 start_pkg_therm_high;
> + struct thermal_zone_device *tzone;
> +};
> +
> +/* List maintaining number of package instances */
> +static LIST_HEAD(phy_dev_list);
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(phy_dev_list_mutex);
> +
> +/* Interrupt to work function schedule queue */
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct delayed_work, pkg_temp_thermal_threshold_work);
> +
> +/* To track if the work is already scheduled on a package */
> +static u8 *pkg_work_scheduled;
> +
> +/* Spin lock to prevent races with pkg_work_scheduled */
> +static spinlock_t pkg_work_lock;
> +static u16 max_phy_id;
> +
> +/* Thermal zone parameters */
> +static struct thermal_zone_params tz_params;
> +
> +/* Debug counters to show using debugfs */
> +static struct dentry *debugfs;
> +static unsigned int pkg_interrupt_cnt;
> +static unsigned int pkg_work_cnt;
> +
> +static int pkg_temp_debugfs_init(void)
> +{
> + struct dentry *d;
> +
> + debugfs = debugfs_create_dir("pkg_temp_thermal", NULL);
> + if (!debugfs)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + d = debugfs_create_u32("pkg_thres_interrupt", S_IRUGO, debugfs,
> + (u32 *)&pkg_interrupt_cnt);
> + if (!d)
> + goto err_out;
> +
> + d = debugfs_create_u32("pkg_thres_work", S_IRUGO, debugfs,
> + (u32 *)&pkg_work_cnt);
> + if (!d)
> + goto err_out;
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_out:
> + debugfs_remove_recursive(debugfs);
> + return -ENOMEM;
you may want to propagate the error code, no?
> +}
> +
> +static struct phy_dev_entry
> + *pkg_temp_thermal_get_phy_entry(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + u16 phys_proc_id = topology_physical_package_id(cpu);
> + struct phy_dev_entry *phy_ptr;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&phy_dev_list_mutex);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(phy_ptr, &phy_dev_list, list)
> + if (phy_ptr->phys_proc_id == phys_proc_id) {
> + mutex_unlock(&phy_dev_list_mutex);
> + return phy_ptr;
> + }
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&phy_dev_list_mutex);
> +
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +* tj-max is is interesting because threshold is set relative to this
> +* temperature.
> +*/
> +static int get_tj_max(int cpu, u32 *tj_max)
> +{
> + u32 eax, edx;
> + u32 val;
> + int err;
> +
> + err = rdmsr_safe_on_cpu(cpu, MSR_IA32_TEMPERATURE_TARGET, &eax, &edx);
> + if (err)
> + goto err_ret;
> + else {
> + val = (eax >> 16) & 0xff;
> + if (val)
> + *tj_max = val * 1000;
> + else
> + goto err_ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +err_ret:
> + *tj_max = 0;
I believe it is safer just not to touch your return parameter in case of
failure.
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static int sys_get_curr_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tzd, unsigned long *temp)
> +{
> + u32 eax, edx;
> + struct phy_dev_entry *phy_dev_entry;
> +
> + WARN_ON(tzd == NULL);
> + WARN_ON(tzd->devdata == NULL);
> +
Can the above ever happen?
> + phy_dev_entry = tzd->devdata;
> + rdmsr_on_cpu(phy_dev_entry->first_cpu, MSR_IA32_PACKAGE_THERM_STATUS,
> + &eax, &edx);
> + if (eax & 0x80000000) {
> + *temp = phy_dev_entry->tj_max -
> + ((eax >> 16) & 0x7f) * 1000;
> + pr_debug("sys_get_curr_temp %ld\n", *temp);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + return -EINVAL;
why invalid?
> +}
> +
> +static int sys_get_trip_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tzd,
> + int trip, unsigned long *temp)
> +{
> + u32 eax, edx;
> + struct phy_dev_entry *phy_dev_entry;
> + u32 mask, shift;
> + unsigned long thres_reg_value;
> + int ret;
> +
> + WARN_ON(tzd == NULL);
> + WARN_ON(tzd->devdata == NULL);
> +
can the above ever happen?
> + if (trip >= MAX_NUMBER_OF_TRIPS)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + phy_dev_entry = tzd->devdata;
> +
> + if (trip) {
> + mask = THERM_MASK_THRESHOLD1;
> + shift = THERM_SHIFT_THRESHOLD1;
> + } else {
> + mask = THERM_MASK_THRESHOLD0;
> + shift = THERM_SHIFT_THRESHOLD0;
> + }
> +
> + ret = rdmsr_on_cpu(phy_dev_entry->first_cpu,
> + MSR_IA32_PACKAGE_THERM_INTERRUPT, &eax, &edx);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + thres_reg_value = (eax & mask) >> shift;
> + if (thres_reg_value)
> + *temp = phy_dev_entry->tj_max - thres_reg_value * 1000;
> + else
> + *temp = 0;
> + pr_debug("sys_get_trip_temp %ld\n", *temp);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int sys_set_trip_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tzd, int trip,
> + unsigned long temp)
> +{
> + u32 l, h;
> + struct phy_dev_entry *phy_dev_entry;
> + u32 mask, shift, intr;
> + int ret;
> +
> + WARN_ON(tzd == NULL);
> + WARN_ON(tzd->devdata == NULL);
> +
> + phy_dev_entry = tzd->devdata;
> +
> + if (trip >= MAX_NUMBER_OF_TRIPS || temp >= phy_dev_entry->tj_max)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + mask = (trip == 0) ? THERM_MASK_THRESHOLD0 : THERM_MASK_THRESHOLD1;
> + shift = (trip == 0) ? THERM_SHIFT_THRESHOLD0 : THERM_SHIFT_THRESHOLD1;
> + intr = (trip == 0) ?
> + THERM_INT_THRESHOLD0_ENABLE : THERM_INT_THRESHOLD0_ENABLE;
> +
Can the amount of trips ever increase in future? If yes, you might
consider a different approach for the above code.
> + ret = rdmsr_on_cpu(phy_dev_entry->first_cpu,
> + MSR_IA32_PACKAGE_THERM_INTERRUPT,
> + &l, &h);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + l &= ~mask;
> + /* Disable threshold interrupt for value == 0 */
Better to document the above statement..
> + if (!temp)
> + l &= ~intr;
> + else {
> + l |= (phy_dev_entry->tj_max - temp)/1000 << shift;
> + l |= intr;
> + }
> + ret = wrmsr_on_cpu(phy_dev_entry->first_cpu,
> + MSR_IA32_PACKAGE_THERM_INTERRUPT,
> + l, h);
> +
> + return ret;
how about simply:
return wrmsr_on_cpu(...
> +}
> +
> +static int sys_get_trip_type(struct thermal_zone_device *thermal,
> + int trip, enum thermal_trip_type *type)
> +{
> +
> + *type = THERMAL_TRIP_PASSIVE;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* Thermal zone callback registry */
> +static struct thermal_zone_device_ops tzone_ops = {
> + .get_temp = sys_get_curr_temp,
> + .get_trip_temp = sys_get_trip_temp,
> + .get_trip_type = sys_get_trip_type,
> + .set_trip_temp = sys_set_trip_temp,
> +};
> +
> +static bool pkg_temp_thermal_platform_thermal_rate_control(void)
> +{
> + return true;
> +}
> +
Why the above function is needed?
> +/* Enable threshold interrupt on local package/cpu */
> +static inline void enable_pkg_thres_interrupt(void)
> +{
> + u32 l, h;
> +
> + rdmsr(MSR_IA32_PACKAGE_THERM_INTERRUPT, l, h);
> + wrmsr(MSR_IA32_PACKAGE_THERM_INTERRUPT,
> + l | (THERM_INT_THRESHOLD0_ENABLE |
> + THERM_INT_THRESHOLD1_ENABLE), h);
> +
> +}
> +
> +/* Disable threshold interrupt on local package/cpu */
> +static inline void disable_pkg_thres_interrupt(void)
> +{
> + u32 l, h;
> + rdmsr(MSR_IA32_PACKAGE_THERM_INTERRUPT, l, h);
> + wrmsr(MSR_IA32_PACKAGE_THERM_INTERRUPT,
> + l & (~THERM_INT_THRESHOLD0_ENABLE) &
> + (~THERM_INT_THRESHOLD1_ENABLE), h);
> +}
> +
> +static void pkg_temp_thermal_threshold_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + __u64 msr_val;
> + int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> + struct phy_dev_entry *phdev =
> + pkg_temp_thermal_get_phy_entry(
> + topology_physical_package_id(cpu));
> + bool notify = false;
> +
> + ++pkg_work_cnt;
> +
Is it correct to update this counter even if the condition below fails?
In case negative answer, move it. Similar question is if you want to
hold pkg_work_lock before updating the counter..
> + if (!phdev)
> + return;
> +
> + spin_lock(&pkg_work_lock);
> + if (unlikely(topology_physical_package_id(cpu) > max_phy_id)) {
> + spin_unlock(&pkg_work_lock);
> + return;
> + }
> + *(pkg_work_scheduled + topology_physical_package_id(cpu)) = 0;
I know notation is a matter of taste most of the time. IMO, the above
statement is written in a strange way, unnecessarily.
> + spin_unlock(&pkg_work_lock);
> +
> + enable_pkg_thres_interrupt();
> + rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_PACKAGE_THERM_STATUS, msr_val);
> + if (msr_val & THERM_LOG_THRESHOLD0) {
> + wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_PACKAGE_THERM_STATUS,
> + msr_val & ~THERM_LOG_THRESHOLD0);
> + notify = true;
> + }
> + if (msr_val & THERM_LOG_THRESHOLD1) {
> + wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_PACKAGE_THERM_STATUS,
> + msr_val & ~THERM_LOG_THRESHOLD1);
> + notify = true;
> + }
> + if (notify) {
> + pr_debug("thermal_zone_device_update\n");
> + thermal_zone_device_update(phdev->tzone);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int pkg_temp_thermal_platform_thermal_notify(__u64 msr_val)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> +
> + ++pkg_interrupt_cnt;
Do you need locking for the above?
> +
> + /*
> + * When a package is in interrupted state, all CPU's in that package
> + * are in the same interrupt state. So scheduling on any one CPU in
> + * the package is enough and simply return for others.
> + */
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&pkg_work_lock, flags);
> + if (unlikely(topology_physical_package_id(cpu) > max_phy_id) ||
> + unlikely(!pkg_work_scheduled) ||
> + (*(pkg_work_scheduled + topology_physical_package_id(cpu)))) {
> + disable_pkg_thres_interrupt();
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pkg_work_lock, flags);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + *(pkg_work_scheduled + topology_physical_package_id(cpu)) = 1;
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pkg_work_lock, flags);
> +
> + disable_pkg_thres_interrupt();
> + schedule_delayed_work_on(cpu,
> + &per_cpu(pkg_temp_thermal_threshold_work, cpu),
> + PKG_TEMP_THERMAL_NOTIFY_DELAY);
What happens if you get several of same irqs/ get called several times
before PKG_TEMP_THERMAL_NOTIFY_DELAY?
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int find_siblings_cpu(int cpu)
> +{
> + int i;
> + int id = topology_physical_package_id(cpu);
> +
> + for_each_online_cpu(i)
> + if (i != cpu && topology_physical_package_id(i) == id)
> + return i;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int pkg_temp_thermal_device_add(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + int err;
> + u32 tj_max;
> + struct phy_dev_entry *phy_dev_entry;
> + char buffer[30];
> + int thres_count;
> + u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
> +
> + cpuid(6, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
> + thres_count = ebx & 0x07;
> + if (!thres_count)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + thres_count = clamp_val(thres_count, 0, MAX_NUMBER_OF_TRIPS);
> +
> + err = get_tj_max(cpu, &tj_max);
> + if (err)
> + goto err_ret;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&phy_dev_list_mutex);
> +
> + phy_dev_entry = kzalloc(sizeof(struct phy_dev_entry), GFP_KERNEL);
How about using sizeof(*phy_dev_entry)?
> + if (!phy_dev_entry) {
> + err = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_ret_unlock;
> + }
> +
> + spin_lock(&pkg_work_lock);
> + if (topology_physical_package_id(cpu) > max_phy_id)
> + max_phy_id = topology_physical_package_id(cpu);
> + pkg_work_scheduled = krealloc(pkg_work_scheduled,
> + (max_phy_id+1) * sizeof(u8), GFP_ATOMIC);
> + if (!pkg_work_scheduled) {
> + spin_unlock(&pkg_work_lock);
> + err = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_ret_free;
> + }
> + *(pkg_work_scheduled + topology_physical_package_id(cpu)) = 0;
> + spin_unlock(&pkg_work_lock);
> +
> + phy_dev_entry->phys_proc_id = topology_physical_package_id(cpu);
> + phy_dev_entry->first_cpu = cpu;
> + phy_dev_entry->tj_max = tj_max;
> + phy_dev_entry->ref_cnt = 1;
> + sprintf(buffer, "pkg-temp-%d\n", phy_dev_entry->phys_proc_id);
how about using snprintf?
> + phy_dev_entry->tzone = thermal_zone_device_register(buffer,
> + thres_count,
> + (thres_count == MAX_NUMBER_OF_TRIPS) ?
> + 0x03 : 0x01,
> + phy_dev_entry, &tzone_ops, &tz_params, 0, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(phy_dev_entry->tzone)) {
> + err = -ENODEV;
How about casting back the ptr err returned by thermal_zone_device_register?
> + goto err_ret_free;
> + }
> + /* Store MSR value for package thermal interrupt, to restore at exit */
> + rdmsr_on_cpu(cpu, MSR_IA32_PACKAGE_THERM_INTERRUPT,
> + &phy_dev_entry->start_pkg_therm_low,
> + &phy_dev_entry->start_pkg_therm_high);
> +
> + list_add_tail(&phy_dev_entry->list, &phy_dev_list);
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&phy_dev_list_mutex);
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_ret_free:
> + kfree(phy_dev_entry);
> +err_ret_unlock:
> + mutex_unlock(&phy_dev_list_mutex);
> +
> +err_ret:
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +static int pkg_temp_thermal_device_remove(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + struct phy_dev_entry *phdev =
> + pkg_temp_thermal_get_phy_entry(
> + topology_physical_package_id(cpu));
> + struct phy_dev_entry *n;
> + u16 phys_proc_id = topology_physical_package_id(cpu);
> +
> + if (!phdev)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&phy_dev_list_mutex);
> + /* If we are loosing the first cpu for this package, we need change */
> + if (phdev->first_cpu == cpu)
> + phdev->first_cpu = find_siblings_cpu(cpu);
> + /*
> + * It is possible that no siblings left as this was the last cpu
> + * going offline. We don't need to worry about this assignment
> + * as the phydev entry will be removed in this case and
> + * thermal zone is removed.
> + */
> + --phdev->ref_cnt;
> + pr_debug("thermal_device_remove: cpu %d ref_cnt %d\n",
> + cpu, phdev->ref_cnt);
> + if (!phdev->ref_cnt)
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(phdev, n, &phy_dev_list, list) {
> + if (phdev->phys_proc_id == phys_proc_id) {
> + sys_set_trip_temp(phdev->tzone, 0, 0);
> + sys_set_trip_temp(phdev->tzone, 1, 0);
> + thermal_zone_device_unregister(phdev->tzone);
> + list_del(&phdev->list);
> + kfree(phdev);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&phy_dev_list_mutex);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int get_core_online(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
> + struct phy_dev_entry *phdev = pkg_temp_thermal_get_phy_entry(cpu);
> +
> + /* Check if there is already an instance for this package */
> + if (!phdev) {
> + if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_DTHERM) &&
> + !cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_PTS))
> + return -ENODEV;
> + if (pkg_temp_thermal_device_add(cpu))
> + return -ENODEV;
> + } else {
> + mutex_lock(&phy_dev_list_mutex);
> + ++phdev->ref_cnt;
> + pr_debug("get_core_online: cpu %d ref_cnt %d\n",
> + cpu, phdev->ref_cnt);
> + mutex_unlock(&phy_dev_list_mutex);
> + }
> + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&per_cpu(pkg_temp_thermal_threshold_work, cpu),
> + pkg_temp_thermal_threshold_work_fn);
> +
> + pr_debug("get_core_online: cpu %d successful\n", cpu);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void put_core_offline(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + if (!pkg_temp_thermal_device_remove(cpu))
> + cancel_delayed_work_sync(
> + &per_cpu(pkg_temp_thermal_threshold_work, cpu));
> +
> + pr_debug("put_core_offline: cpu %d\n", cpu);
> +}
> +
> +static int pkg_temp_thermal_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
> + unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
> +{
> + unsigned int cpu = (unsigned long) hcpu;
> +
> + switch (action) {
> + case CPU_ONLINE:
> + case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
> + get_core_online(cpu);
> + break;
> + case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE:
> + put_core_offline(cpu);
> + break;
> + }
> + return NOTIFY_OK;
> +}
> +
> +static struct notifier_block pkg_temp_thermal_notifier __refdata = {
> + .notifier_call = pkg_temp_thermal_cpu_callback,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct x86_cpu_id __initconst pkg_temp_thermal_ids[] = {
> + { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, X86_FAMILY_ANY, X86_MODEL_ANY, X86_FEATURE_DTHERM },
> + {}
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, pkg_temp_thermal_ids);
> +
> +static int __init pkg_temp_thermal_init(void)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + if (!x86_match_cpu(pkg_temp_thermal_ids))
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + strncpy(tz_params.governor_name, "user_space", THERMAL_NAME_LENGTH);
> + spin_lock_init(&pkg_work_lock);
> + platform_thermal_package_notify =
> + pkg_temp_thermal_platform_thermal_notify;
> + platform_thermal_package_rate_control =
> + pkg_temp_thermal_platform_thermal_rate_control;
> +
> + get_online_cpus();
> + for_each_online_cpu(i)
> + if (get_core_online(i))
> + goto err_ret;
> + register_hotcpu_notifier(&pkg_temp_thermal_notifier);
> + put_online_cpus();
> +
> + pkg_temp_debugfs_init(); /* Don't care if fails */
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_ret:
> + get_online_cpus();
> + for_each_online_cpu(i)
> + put_core_offline(i);
> + put_online_cpus();
> + kfree(pkg_work_scheduled);
> + platform_thermal_package_notify = NULL;
> + platform_thermal_package_rate_control = NULL;
> +
> + return -ENODEV;
> +}
> +
> +static void __exit pkg_temp_thermal_exit(void)
> +{
> + struct phy_dev_entry *phdev, *n;
> + int i;
> +
> + get_online_cpus();
> + unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&pkg_temp_thermal_notifier);
> + mutex_lock(&phy_dev_list_mutex);
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(phdev, n, &phy_dev_list, list) {
> + /* Retore old MSR value for package thermal interrupt */
> + wrmsr_on_cpu(phdev->first_cpu,
> + MSR_IA32_PACKAGE_THERM_INTERRUPT,
> + phdev->start_pkg_therm_low,
> + phdev->start_pkg_therm_high);
> + thermal_zone_device_unregister(phdev->tzone);
> + list_del(&phdev->list);
> + kfree(phdev);
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&phy_dev_list_mutex);
> + platform_thermal_package_notify = NULL;
> + platform_thermal_package_rate_control = NULL;
> + for_each_online_cpu(i)
> + cancel_delayed_work_sync(
> + &per_cpu(pkg_temp_thermal_threshold_work, i));
> + put_online_cpus();
> +
> + kfree(pkg_work_scheduled);
> +
> + debugfs_remove_recursive(debugfs);
> +}
> +
> +module_init(pkg_temp_thermal_init)
> +module_exit(pkg_temp_thermal_exit)
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("X86 PKG TEMP Thermal Driver");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>
GPL v2 ?
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 295 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-13 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-07 18:57 [PATCH 0/2] CPU Package temperarure thermal driver Srinivas Pandruvada
2013-05-07 18:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86, mcheck, therm_throt: Process package thresholds Srinivas Pandruvada
2013-05-13 19:28 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-05-14 15:23 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2013-05-07 18:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] Thermal: CPU Package temperature thermal Srinivas Pandruvada
2013-05-13 19:30 ` Eduardo Valentin [this message]
2013-05-14 16:39 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2013-05-13 15:01 ` [PATCH 0/2] CPU Package temperarure thermal driver Srinivas Pandruvada
2013-05-13 19:08 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-05-13 19:16 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-05-14 15:12 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51913F60.6060405@ti.com \
--to=eduardo.valentin@ti.com \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox