From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ACPI / PM: Drop two functions that are not used any more
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:20:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C02664.2050603@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2934743.cl2LaccKZx@vostro.rjw.lan>
On 06/14/2013 08:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> Two functions defined in device_pm.c, acpi_dev_pm_add_dependent()
> and acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent(), have no callers and may be
> dropped, so drop them.
Please hold on for a moment, I would like to discuss the ATA ACPI
binding with you and Tejun, the current binding with SCSI device tree
doesn't buy us anything but introduced some nasty consequences. I think
we should bind ACPI handle with ATA port/device, I have a draft patch
for this and will send out soon. If we go binding with ATA port/device,
then the two functions will be needed :-)
Thanks,
Aaron
>
> Moreover, they are the only functions adding entries to and removing
> entries from the power_dependent list in struct acpi_device, so drop
> that list and the loop walking it in acpi_power_resume_dependent()
> too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/device_pm.c | 56 -----------------------------------------------
> drivers/acpi/power.c | 3 --
> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 1
> include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 7 -----
> 4 files changed, 67 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> +++ linux-pm/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> @@ -308,7 +308,6 @@ struct acpi_device {
> struct list_head physical_node_list;
> struct mutex physical_node_lock;
> DECLARE_BITMAP(physical_node_id_bitmap, ACPI_MAX_PHYSICAL_NODE);
> - struct list_head power_dependent;
> void (*remove)(struct acpi_device *);
> };
>
> @@ -461,8 +460,6 @@ acpi_status acpi_add_pm_notifier(struct
> acpi_status acpi_remove_pm_notifier(struct acpi_device *adev,
> acpi_notify_handler handler);
> int acpi_pm_device_sleep_state(struct device *, int *, int);
> -void acpi_dev_pm_add_dependent(acpi_handle handle, struct device *depdev);
> -void acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent(acpi_handle handle, struct device *depdev);
> #else
> static inline acpi_status acpi_add_pm_notifier(struct acpi_device *adev,
> acpi_notify_handler handler,
> @@ -482,10 +479,6 @@ static inline int acpi_pm_device_sleep_s
>
> return (m >= ACPI_STATE_D0 && m <= ACPI_STATE_D3) ? m : ACPI_STATE_D0;
> }
> -static inline void acpi_dev_pm_add_dependent(acpi_handle handle,
> - struct device *depdev) {}
> -static inline void acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent(acpi_handle handle,
> - struct device *depdev) {}
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
> @@ -994,60 +994,4 @@ void acpi_dev_pm_detach(struct device *d
> }
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dev_pm_detach);
> -
> -/**
> - * acpi_dev_pm_add_dependent - Add physical device depending for PM.
> - * @handle: Handle of ACPI device node.
> - * @depdev: Device depending on that node for PM.
> - */
> -void acpi_dev_pm_add_dependent(acpi_handle handle, struct device *depdev)
> -{
> - struct acpi_device_physical_node *dep;
> - struct acpi_device *adev;
> -
> - if (!depdev || acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &adev))
> - return;
> -
> - mutex_lock(&adev->physical_node_lock);
> -
> - list_for_each_entry(dep, &adev->power_dependent, node)
> - if (dep->dev == depdev)
> - goto out;
> -
> - dep = kzalloc(sizeof(*dep), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (dep) {
> - dep->dev = depdev;
> - list_add_tail(&dep->node, &adev->power_dependent);
> - }
> -
> - out:
> - mutex_unlock(&adev->physical_node_lock);
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dev_pm_add_dependent);
> -
> -/**
> - * acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent - Remove physical device depending for PM.
> - * @handle: Handle of ACPI device node.
> - * @depdev: Device depending on that node for PM.
> - */
> -void acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent(acpi_handle handle, struct device *depdev)
> -{
> - struct acpi_device_physical_node *dep;
> - struct acpi_device *adev;
> -
> - if (!depdev || acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &adev))
> - return;
> -
> - mutex_lock(&adev->physical_node_lock);
> -
> - list_for_each_entry(dep, &adev->power_dependent, node)
> - if (dep->dev == depdev) {
> - list_del(&dep->node);
> - kfree(dep);
> - break;
> - }
> -
> - mutex_unlock(&adev->physical_node_lock);
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent);
> #endif /* CONFIG_PM */
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/power.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/power.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/power.c
> @@ -253,9 +253,6 @@ static void acpi_power_resume_dependent(
> list_for_each_entry(pn, &adev->physical_node_list, node)
> pm_request_resume(pn->dev);
>
> - list_for_each_entry(pn, &adev->power_dependent, node)
> - pm_request_resume(pn->dev);
> -
> mutex_unlock(&adev->physical_node_lock);
> }
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -1018,7 +1018,6 @@ int acpi_device_add(struct acpi_device *
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&device->wakeup_list);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&device->physical_node_list);
> mutex_init(&device->physical_node_lock);
> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&device->power_dependent);
>
> new_bus_id = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_device_bus_id), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!new_bus_id) {
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-18 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-14 12:29 [PATCH 0/4] ACPI / PM: Cleanups and device power state selection rework Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-14 12:31 ` [PATCH 1/4] ACPI / PM: Rename function acpi_device_power_state() and make it static Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-14 12:31 ` [PATCH 2/4] ACPI / PM: Replace ACPI_STATE_D3 with ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD in device_pm.c Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-14 12:32 ` [PATCH 3/4] ACPI / PM: Rework and clean up acpi_dev_pm_get_state() Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-27 8:11 ` Aaron Lu
2013-06-27 12:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-28 7:53 ` Aaron Lu
2013-06-14 12:33 ` [PATCH 4/4] ACPI / PM: Drop two functions that are not used any more Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-18 9:20 ` Aaron Lu [this message]
2013-06-18 13:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51C02664.2050603@intel.com \
--to=aaron.lu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tianyu.lan@intel.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).