linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
To: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, eduardo.valentin@ti.com,
	durgadoss.r@intel.com, shawn.guo@linaro.org,
	ruslan.ruslichenko@ti.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] Thermal: fix step_wise handling of THERMAL_TREND_DROP_EFULL
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 17:11:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51D341F5.8080905@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371475468-5351-5-git-send-email-rui.zhang@intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2155 bytes --]

On subject s/THERMAL_TREND_DROP_EFULL/THERMAL_TREND_DROP_FULL/g

On 17-06-2013 09:24, Zhang Rui wrote:
> Change the step_wise cooling algorithm to handle
> THERMAL_TREND_DROP_FULL a bit differently.
> 
> When the temperature is higher than the trip point,
> we should always use the instance->lower as the next target state.
> When the temperature is lower than the trip point,
> we should always deactive the thermal instance.

s/deactive/deactivate/g


Are you expecting to optimize the system in which way by doing this
change? In which situation we would need to set to instance->lower if we
are at a state which trend is dropping fully?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/thermal/step_wise.c |   12 +++++-------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c b/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
> index f0cc5e5..84d6e90 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
> @@ -42,9 +42,8 @@
>   *       state for this trip point, if the cooling state already
>   *       equals lower limit, deactivate the thermal instance
>   *    c. if the trend is THERMAL_TREND_RAISE_FULL, do nothing
> - *    d. if the trend is THERMAL_TREND_DROP_FULL, use lower limit,
> - *       if the cooling state already equals lower limit,
> - *       deactive the thermal instance
> + *    d. if the trend is THERMAL_TREND_DROP_FULL, deactive
> + *	 the thermal instance
>   */
>  static unsigned long get_target_state(struct thermal_instance *instance,
>  				enum thermal_trend trend, bool throttle)
> @@ -91,11 +90,10 @@ static unsigned long get_target_state(struct thermal_instance *instance,
>  		}
>  		break;
>  	case THERMAL_TREND_DROP_FULL:
> -		if (cur_state == instance->lower) {
> -			if (!throttle)
> -				next_target = THERMAL_NO_TARGET;
> -		} else
> +		if (throttle)
>  			next_target = instance->lower;
> +		else
> +			next_target = THERMAL_NO_TARGET;
>  		break;
>  	default:
>  		break;
> 


-- 
You have got to be excited about what you are doing. (L. Lamport)

Eduardo Valentin


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 295 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-02 21:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-17 13:24 [RFC PATCH 0/6] Thermal: step_wise governor fixes Zhang Rui
2013-06-17 13:24 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] thermal: step_wise: cdev only needs update on a new target state Zhang Rui
2013-06-17 13:24 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] thermal: step_wise: return instance->target by default Zhang Rui
2013-06-17 13:24 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] Thermal: fix step_wise handling of THERMAL_TREND_DROPPING Zhang Rui
2013-07-02 20:57   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-08  2:32     ` Zhang Rui
2013-06-17 13:24 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] Thermal: fix step_wise handling of THERMAL_TREND_DROP_EFULL Zhang Rui
2013-07-02 21:11   ` Eduardo Valentin [this message]
2013-07-08  2:35     ` Zhang Rui
2013-06-17 13:24 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] Thermal: step_wise handle THERMAL_TREND_STABLE explicitly Zhang Rui
2013-06-17 13:24 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] Thermal: step_wise: set next cooling target explicitly Zhang Rui
2013-07-02 21:03   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-08  2:34     ` Zhang Rui
2013-07-02 21:05   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-06-18  3:45 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] Thermal: step_wise governor fixes Shawn Guo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51D341F5.8080905@ti.com \
    --to=eduardo.valentin@ti.com \
    --cc=durgadoss.r@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=ruslan.ruslichenko@ti.com \
    --cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).