Re: [PATCH 0/8] Cpufreq, cpu hotplug, suspend/resume related fixes

["Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

On 07/15/2013 01:57 PM, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> On 2013年07月12日 06:15, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Commit a66b2e (cpufreq: Preserve sysfs files across suspend/resume) caused
>> some subtle regressions in the cpufreq subsystem during suspend/resume.
>> This patchset is aimed at rectifying those problems, by fixing the regression
>> as well as achieving the original goal of that commit in a proper way.
>>
>> Patch 1 reverts the above commit, and is CC'ed to stable.
>>
>> Patches 2 - 5 reorganize the code and have no functional impact, and can go
>> in as general cleanups as well. This reorganization builds a base that the
>> rest of the patches will make use of.
>>
>> Patch 6 and 7 add a mechanism to perform light-weight init/tear-down of CPUs
>> in the cpufreq subsystem and finally patch 8 uses it to preserve sysfs files
>> across suspend/resume.
>>
>> All the patches apply on current mainline.
>>
>>
>> Robert, Durgadoss, it would be great if you could try it out and see if it works
>> well for your usecase. I tested it locally and cpufreq related files did retain
>> their permissions across suspend/resume. Let me know if it works fine in your
>> setup too.
>>
>> And I'd of course appreciate to hear from Dirk, Tianyu and Toralf to know
>> whether their systems work fine after:
>> a. applying only the first commit (this is what gets backported to stable)
>> b. applying all the commits
> 
> Hi, I tested this patchset on my machine and the issue in bug 59781 has
> been resolved.
> 
> Tested-by: Tianyu Lan <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
> 

Awesome! Thanks a lot!

Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat