From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Subject: Re: 3.10.1 cpufreq suspend/resume regression still present in 3.10.2 Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 22:27:40 +0530 Message-ID: <51ED6484.1070306@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20130722151653.GA7213@sacarino.pirispons.net> <51ED4E2D.5020908@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130722165355.GA18371@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from e23smtp01.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.143]:59984 "EHLO e23smtp01.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754635Ab3GVRBT (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jul 2013 13:01:19 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp01.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 02:51:41 +1000 In-Reply-To: <20130722165355.GA18371@kroah.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Greg KH Cc: Kiko Piris , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Linux PM mailing list On 07/22/2013 10:23 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 08:52:21PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote: >> And both of them have been CC'ed to -stable. So they should be hitting >> the stable tree soon. >> >> Hmm, that reminds me.. whenever a patch cc'ed to stable hit the mainline, >> the patch signers used to receive an automatic email from Greg. I didn't >> get that for the above two patches.. Did the process change due to the >> recent discussions around -stable tree maintenance? > > No, it did not change, I just have 150+ pending patches for the > 3.11-stable tree that I have yet to get through, give me a few weeks > please. > Oh! Sure, no problem. Thank you! Regards, Srivatsa S. Bhat