* RE: [PATCH 1/1] x86, acpi: Fix wrong checking condition in acpi_register_lapic().
2013-07-23 1:39 [PATCH 1/1] x86, acpi: Fix wrong checking condition in acpi_register_lapic() Tang Chen
@ 2013-07-23 1:38 ` Brown, Len
2013-07-23 7:39 ` Ingo Molnar
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Brown, Len @ 2013-07-23 1:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tang Chen, pavel@ucw.cz, rjw@sisk.pl, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/1] x86, acpi: Fix wrong checking condition in acpi_register_lapic().
@ 2013-07-23 1:39 Tang Chen
2013-07-23 1:38 ` Brown, Len
2013-07-23 7:39 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tang Chen @ 2013-07-23 1:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: len.brown, pavel, rjw, tglx, mingo, hpa, x86, linux-pm,
linux-kernel
We wanted to check if the acpi id is out of range. It should be:
if (id >= (MAX_LOCAL_APIC)).
Signed-off-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
index d81a972..2a15ae7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static void __cpuinit acpi_register_lapic(int id, u8 enabled)
{
unsigned int ver = 0;
- if (id >= (MAX_LOCAL_APIC-1)) {
+ if (id >= (MAX_LOCAL_APIC)) {
printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "skipped apicid that is too big\n");
return;
}
--
1.7.10.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86, acpi: Fix wrong checking condition in acpi_register_lapic().
2013-07-23 1:39 [PATCH 1/1] x86, acpi: Fix wrong checking condition in acpi_register_lapic() Tang Chen
2013-07-23 1:38 ` Brown, Len
@ 2013-07-23 7:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-07-23 7:55 ` Tang Chen
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2013-07-23 7:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tang Chen
Cc: len.brown, pavel, rjw, tglx, mingo, hpa, x86, linux-pm,
linux-kernel
* Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> We wanted to check if the acpi id is out of range. It should be:
> if (id >= (MAX_LOCAL_APIC)).
Does this have any practical impact, or can it wait until v3.12?
> Signed-off-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> index d81a972..2a15ae7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static void __cpuinit acpi_register_lapic(int id, u8 enabled)
> {
> unsigned int ver = 0;
>
> - if (id >= (MAX_LOCAL_APIC-1)) {
> + if (id >= (MAX_LOCAL_APIC)) {
The parentheses are now superfluous.
Thanks,
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86, acpi: Fix wrong checking condition in acpi_register_lapic().
2013-07-23 7:39 ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2013-07-23 7:55 ` Tang Chen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tang Chen @ 2013-07-23 7:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar
Cc: len.brown, pavel, rjw, tglx, mingo, hpa, x86, linux-pm,
linux-kernel
On 07/23/2013 03:39 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Tang Chen<tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
>> We wanted to check if the acpi id is out of range. It should be:
>> if (id>= (MAX_LOCAL_APIC)).
>
> Does this have any practical impact, or can it wait until v3.12?
I haven't tested out any impact now, just found it when reading the code.
We can wait until v3.12.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Tang Chen<tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
>> index d81a972..2a15ae7 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
>> @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static void __cpuinit acpi_register_lapic(int id, u8 enabled)
>> {
>> unsigned int ver = 0;
>>
>> - if (id>= (MAX_LOCAL_APIC-1)) {
>> + if (id>= (MAX_LOCAL_APIC)) {
>
> The parentheses are now superfluous.
Oh, yes. I'll send a new version without the parentheses.
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-07-23 7:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-07-23 1:39 [PATCH 1/1] x86, acpi: Fix wrong checking condition in acpi_register_lapic() Tang Chen
2013-07-23 1:38 ` Brown, Len
2013-07-23 7:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-07-23 7:55 ` Tang Chen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).