From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Toralf Förster" <toralf.foerster@gmx.de>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: stable 3-10-3: strange output of "lsmod | grep ^acpi_cpufreq"
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 13:38:42 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F4D18A.7080605@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51F4D17F.1090107@gmx.de>
On 07/28/2013 01:38 PM, Toralf Förster wrote:
> On 07/28/2013 01:39 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Saturday, July 27, 2013 07:40:34 PM Toralf Förster wrote:
>>> it gives at a ThinkPad T420:
>>>
>>> tfoerste@n22 ~/tmp $ lsmod | grep ^acpi_cpufreq
>>> acpi_cpufreq 12902 2147483647
>>
>> That is -1, which indicates some module refcount woes.
>>
>> I definitely can't see that with the mainline on my machines.
>
> It might be a regression in -stable only, b/c in 3,10.2 I did not
> observed it.
>
> Srivatsa,
>
> by any chance - could the revert of the cpufreq patches have something
> to do with that ?
>
Hmmm? Those reverts didn't touch anything related to module
refcounts.. So I don't think they have anything to do with this.
Also, is the issue related to suspend/resume at all? (Sorry, I don't
have your original email, so I'm not sure what the exact issue is).
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-28 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <51F40612.2050403@gmx.de>
2013-07-27 23:39 ` stable 3-10-3: strange output of "lsmod | grep ^acpi_cpufreq" Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-28 8:08 ` Toralf Förster
2013-07-28 8:08 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat [this message]
2013-07-28 10:21 ` Toralf Förster
2013-07-28 22:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-28 22:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-28 23:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-29 7:51 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-07-29 9:44 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-07-29 9:41 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-07-29 11:22 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-07-29 11:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-29 11:48 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-07-29 17:23 ` Toralf Förster
2013-07-29 20:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-30 5:23 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-07-29 11:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-29 11:44 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-07-29 12:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-29 15:27 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-07-29 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51F4D18A.7080605@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=toralf.foerster@gmx.de \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox