From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Subject: Re: [Update][PATCH] cpufreq: Do not hold driver module references for additional policy CPUs Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 20:16:01 +0530 Message-ID: <51FBC629.9080908@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <2362640.pUofnXyzOi@vostro.rjw.lan> <5361062.ChI1FUI32W@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux PM list , cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Lists linaro-kernel List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 08/02/2013 08:08 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 2 August 2013 19:01, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> Care to add a changelog? >> >> I'll apply this on top of my $subject patch, then. > > I thought you will merge this one with your patch, but there is no > harm in getting one more on my name :) > > Changelog is (patch attached): > > From: Viresh Kumar > Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 16:17:33 +0530 > Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: Pass policy to cpufreq_add_policy_cpu() > > Caller of cpufreq_add_policy_cpu() already has pointer to policy structure and > so there is no need to find it again in cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(). Lets pass it > directly. > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar > --- The patch looks good. Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat Regards, Srivatsa S. Bhat > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 18 ++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) >