[PATCH] OPP: Export opp_add()

[PATCH] OPP: Export opp_add()

[Viresh Kumar]

Export opp_add() so that modules can use it.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/base/power/opp.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp.c b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
index c8ec186..ef89897 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/opp.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
@@ -460,6 +460,7 @@ int opp_add(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq, unsigned long u_volt)
 	srcu_notifier_call_chain(&dev_opp->head, OPP_EVENT_ADD, new_opp);
 	return 0;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(opp_add);
 
 /**
  * opp_set_availability() - helper to set the availability of an opp
-- 
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e

Re: [PATCH] OPP: Export opp_add()

[Nishanth Menon]

minor nitpick.
$subject: PM / OPP:

On 08/03/2013 04:25 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Export opp_add() so that modules can use it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
>   drivers/base/power/opp.c | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp.c b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> index c8ec186..ef89897 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> @@ -460,6 +460,7 @@ int opp_add(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq, unsigned long u_volt)
>   	srcu_notifier_call_chain(&dev_opp->head, OPP_EVENT_ADD, new_opp);
>   	return 0;
>   }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(opp_add);
>
>   /**
>    * opp_set_availability() - helper to set the availability of an opp
>
other than that,
Acked-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon

Re: [PATCH] OPP: Export opp_add()

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Monday, August 05, 2013 07:29:09 AM Nishanth Menon wrote:
> minor nitpick.
> $subject: PM / OPP:

Those are things I can easily fix up when I'm applying the patch.

> On 08/03/2013 04:25 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > Export opp_add() so that modules can use it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >   drivers/base/power/opp.c | 1 +
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp.c b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> > index c8ec186..ef89897 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> > @@ -460,6 +460,7 @@ int opp_add(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq, unsigned long u_volt)
> >   	srcu_notifier_call_chain(&dev_opp->head, OPP_EVENT_ADD, new_opp);
> >   	return 0;
> >   }
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(opp_add);
> >
> >   /**
> >    * opp_set_availability() - helper to set the availability of an opp
> >
> other than that,
> Acked-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
> 
> 
-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

Re: [PATCH] OPP: Export opp_add()

[Viresh Kumar]

On 5 August 2013 18:17, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> On Monday, August 05, 2013 07:29:09 AM Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> minor nitpick.
>> $subject: PM / OPP:

Stupid mistake.

> Those are things I can easily fix up when I'm applying the patch.

Thanks :)

Re: [PATCH] OPP: Export opp_add()

[Randy Dunlap]

On 08/03/2013 02:25 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Export opp_add() so that modules can use it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
>   drivers/base/power/opp.c | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp.c b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> index c8ec186..ef89897 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> @@ -460,6 +460,7 @@ int opp_add(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq, unsigned long u_volt)
>   	srcu_notifier_call_chain(&dev_opp->head, OPP_EVENT_ADD, new_opp);
>   	return 0;
>   }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(opp_add);

Could it be renamed to pm_opp_add() or power_opp_add() ?
The name is a bit too unspecific IMO.

>
>   /**
>    * opp_set_availability() - helper to set the availability of an opp
>


-- 
~Randy

OPP: rename functions? (was [PATCH] OPP: Export opp_add())

[Nishanth Menon]

change in subject to reflect new discussion.

On 05:53-20130806, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 08/03/2013 02:25 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >Export opp_add() so that modules can use it.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> >---
> >  drivers/base/power/opp.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp.c b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> >index c8ec186..ef89897 100644
> >--- a/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> >+++ b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> >@@ -460,6 +460,7 @@ int opp_add(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq, unsigned long u_volt)
> >  	srcu_notifier_call_chain(&dev_opp->head, OPP_EVENT_ADD, new_opp);
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(opp_add);
> 
> Could it be renamed to pm_opp_add() or power_opp_add() ?
> The name is a bit too unspecific IMO.
Though this has nothing specific with this patch, an interesting point.

git grep -w opp . showed drivers/tty/n_tty.c,
drivers/sbus/char/openprom.c and arch/powerpc/kvm/mpic.c using
variables named opp to mean what ever they had in context. rest(around
40 odd files) seem to use opp as in Documentation/power/opp.txt..

We could go with a pm_ prefix or even dev_pm_opp_ prefix to be more
specific, though I prefer just pm_. If Rafael and others are ok, I can
post a series out.

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon

Re: OPP: rename functions? (was [PATCH] OPP: Export opp_add())

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday, August 06, 2013 08:08:20 AM Nishanth Menon wrote:
> change in subject to reflect new discussion.
> 
> On 05:53-20130806, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 08/03/2013 02:25 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > >Export opp_add() so that modules can use it.
> > >
> > >Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> > >---
> > >  drivers/base/power/opp.c | 1 +
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > >diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp.c b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> > >index c8ec186..ef89897 100644
> > >--- a/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> > >+++ b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> > >@@ -460,6 +460,7 @@ int opp_add(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq, unsigned long u_volt)
> > >  	srcu_notifier_call_chain(&dev_opp->head, OPP_EVENT_ADD, new_opp);
> > >  	return 0;
> > >  }
> > >+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(opp_add);
> > 
> > Could it be renamed to pm_opp_add() or power_opp_add() ?
> > The name is a bit too unspecific IMO.
> Though this has nothing specific with this patch, an interesting point.
> 
> git grep -w opp . showed drivers/tty/n_tty.c,
> drivers/sbus/char/openprom.c and arch/powerpc/kvm/mpic.c using
> variables named opp to mean what ever they had in context. rest(around
> 40 odd files) seem to use opp as in Documentation/power/opp.txt..
> 
> We could go with a pm_ prefix or even dev_pm_opp_ prefix to be more
> specific, though I prefer just pm_. If Rafael and others are ok, I can
> post a series out.

Yup, that would be useful.  I'm for dev_pm_opp_ if that matters.

Thanks,
Rafael

Re: OPP: rename functions? (was [PATCH] OPP: Export opp_add())

[Nishanth Menon]

Rafael,
offline question:

On 08/06/2013 09:15 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 06, 2013 08:08:20 AM Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> change in subject to reflect new discussion.
>>
>> On 05:53-20130806, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> On 08/03/2013 02:25 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:

>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(opp_add);
>>>
>>> Could it be renamed to pm_opp_add() or power_opp_add() ?
>>> The name is a bit too unspecific IMO.
>> Though this has nothing specific with this patch, an interesting point.
>>
>> git grep -w opp . showed drivers/tty/n_tty.c,
>> drivers/sbus/char/openprom.c and arch/powerpc/kvm/mpic.c using
>> variables named opp to mean what ever they had in context. rest(around
>> 40 odd files) seem to use opp as in Documentation/power/opp.txt..
>>
>> We could go with a pm_ prefix or even dev_pm_opp_ prefix to be more
>> specific, though I prefer just pm_. If Rafael and others are ok, I can
>> post a series out.
>
> Yup, that would be useful.  I'm for dev_pm_opp_ if that matters.

Given that there would be quiet a few conflicts, do you have a 
suggestion around what baseline I should submit this?


-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon

Re: OPP: rename functions? (was [PATCH] OPP: Export opp_add())

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Wednesday, August 07, 2013 10:48:54 AM Nishanth Menon wrote:
> Rafael,
> offline question:

Not really offline. :-)

> On 08/06/2013 09:15 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 06, 2013 08:08:20 AM Nishanth Menon wrote:
> >> change in subject to reflect new discussion.
> >>
> >> On 05:53-20130806, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >>> On 08/03/2013 02:25 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> 
> >>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(opp_add);
> >>>
> >>> Could it be renamed to pm_opp_add() or power_opp_add() ?
> >>> The name is a bit too unspecific IMO.
> >> Though this has nothing specific with this patch, an interesting point.
> >>
> >> git grep -w opp . showed drivers/tty/n_tty.c,
> >> drivers/sbus/char/openprom.c and arch/powerpc/kvm/mpic.c using
> >> variables named opp to mean what ever they had in context. rest(around
> >> 40 odd files) seem to use opp as in Documentation/power/opp.txt..
> >>
> >> We could go with a pm_ prefix or even dev_pm_opp_ prefix to be more
> >> specific, though I prefer just pm_. If Rafael and others are ok, I can
> >> post a series out.
> >
> > Yup, that would be useful.  I'm for dev_pm_opp_ if that matters.
> 
> Given that there would be quiet a few conflicts, do you have a 
> suggestion around what baseline I should submit this?

Well, ideally, on top of 3.12-rc1 when it's out and put it into linux-next
right after that.

Thanks,
Rafael

Re: OPP: rename functions? (was [PATCH] OPP: Export opp_add())

[Nishanth Menon]

On 08/07/2013 05:53 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 07, 2013 10:48:54 AM Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> Rafael,
>> offline question:
>
> Not really offline. :-)
>

:D..

>> On 08/06/2013 09:15 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, August 06, 2013 08:08:20 AM Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>>> change in subject to reflect new discussion.
>>>>
>>>> On 05:53-20130806, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>>> On 08/03/2013 02:25 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>
>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(opp_add);
>>>>>
>>>>> Could it be renamed to pm_opp_add() or power_opp_add() ?
>>>>> The name is a bit too unspecific IMO.
>>>> Though this has nothing specific with this patch, an interesting point.
>>>>
>>>> git grep -w opp . showed drivers/tty/n_tty.c,
>>>> drivers/sbus/char/openprom.c and arch/powerpc/kvm/mpic.c using
>>>> variables named opp to mean what ever they had in context. rest(around
>>>> 40 odd files) seem to use opp as in Documentation/power/opp.txt..
>>>>
>>>> We could go with a pm_ prefix or even dev_pm_opp_ prefix to be more
>>>> specific, though I prefer just pm_. If Rafael and others are ok, I can
>>>> post a series out.
>>>
>>> Yup, that would be useful.  I'm for dev_pm_opp_ if that matters.
>>
>> Given that there would be quiet a few conflicts, do you have a
>> suggestion around what baseline I should submit this?
>
> Well, ideally, on top of 3.12-rc1 when it's out and put it into linux-next
> right after that.

Will do. Thanks on the hint.

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon