From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: TC2: CPU idle big.LITTLE driver Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 11:13:42 +0200 Message-ID: <521F10C6.3000409@linaro.org> References: <20130812153422.GA6426@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20130825090848.GA12256@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20130828183624.GH8607@quad.lixom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-bk0-f50.google.com ([209.85.214.50]:53466 "EHLO mail-bk0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752488Ab3H2JNv (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Aug 2013 05:13:51 -0400 Received: by mail-bk0-f50.google.com with SMTP id mz11so54935bkb.9 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 02:13:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130828183624.GH8607@quad.lixom.net> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Olof Johansson Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi , khilman@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, nicolas.pitre@linaro.org On 08/28/2013 08:36 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 10:08:48AM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: >> Hi Olof, Kevin, >> >> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:34:22PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: >>> Hi Olof, Kevin, >>> >>> please pull this patch series that provides a CPU idle driver for t= he vexpress >>> TC2 testchip, and it is a stepping stone towards an ARM unified CPU= idle driver >>> based on the MCPM framework. >>> >>> Series is based against this pull request from Pawel which is a str= ict >>> dependency and they must be merged in order: >>> >>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-August/1= 90067.html >> >> May I ask you please the status of this pull request ? It is to know= if >> it is ok as it is or I have to do something on my side, thanks. >=20 > This needed a rebase on top of the latest version of the mcpm backend= branch, > since it's based on an older version. >=20 > I also don't see an ack from any of the cpuidle maintainers, if you w= ant to > take it through arm-soc you need to get them to ack it for that purpo= se. I see > that you got an informal "It sounds good to me" in > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg266442.html, but please be= diligent > in collecting these in the future. Hi Olof, there is my signed-off for the cpuidle patch because I wrote part of it and Lorenzo finished it. This is why I thought it was not necessary to add my acked-by. > So, I've essentially applied the topmost 3 patches in a new branch th= at's based > on our version of vexpress/mcpm, and merged that in. Cool thanks ! -- Daniel --=20 Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for= ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog