From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: cpufreq_stats NULL deref on second system suspend
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 16:47:25 +0530
Message-ID: <52305145.5060901@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <522E1FEF.6080803@wwwdotorg.org> <1775778.MeiRhuYy7o@vostro.rjw.lan>	<522F86AD.6010603@wwwdotorg.org> <2521560.SfeNbV74nj@vostro.rjw.lan>	<52304439.3030301@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <CAKohpokTVzikxunqSdUYmLjTOkfhWFJ=N4TTa4rdbj2euCFY-g@mail.gmail.com> <52304F92.6030109@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <CAKohpo=Wg=e0_+N1Vmx2m6monFMrbdFSfGE_Ufr0D0_kunreFw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from e28smtp05.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.5]:55028 "EHLO
	e28smtp05.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754902Ab3IKLVY (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 11 Sep 2013 07:21:24 -0400
Received: from /spool/local
	by e28smtp05.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted
	for <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org> from <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>;
	Wed, 11 Sep 2013 16:44:23 +0530
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpo=Wg=e0_+N1Vmx2m6monFMrbdFSfGE_Ufr0D0_kunreFw@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>, "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, cpufreq <cpufreq@vger.kernel.org>

On 09/11/2013 04:45 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 11 September 2013 16:40, Srivatsa S. Bhat
> <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> On 09/11/2013 04:14 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>> On 11 September 2013 15:51, Srivatsa S. Bhat
>>> <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>> On 09/11/2013 04:04 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>>> On Tuesday, September 10, 2013 02:53:01 PM Stephen Warren wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> Sure, it's due to 5302c3f "cpufreq: Perform light-weight init/teardown
>>>>>> during suspend/resume".
>>>
>>> Sorry Stephen, I was away on vacations and came back yesterday only..
>>> And was badly stuck in something other CPUFreq bugs until now :)
>>>
>>>> Sure, Rafael. Thanks for CC'ing me.
>>>
>>> Thanks for jumping in and helping us out buddy!!!.
>>>
>>
>> No problem :-) Besides, I am the one who broke it ;-(
> 
> I believe you missed some part of my mail ?
> 

See my next reply :-) I was composing it :-)

Man, you are *fast*! ;-)
 
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat