From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/21] cpuidle: don't call poll_idle_init() for every cpu Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 10:28:27 +0200 Message-ID: <5243F02B.2030302@linaro.org> References: <495ffb1175175b0180ca3da96eb5ed72a8280364.1379779777.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <52436237.3040500@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Lists linaro-kernel , Patch Tracking , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 09/26/2013 08:09 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 26 September 2013 03:52, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> On 09/22/2013 03:21 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar > > This deserved a log, sorry for missing that :( > >> The optimization sounds good but IMHO if we can move this state out = of >> the cpuidle common framework that would be nicer. >> >> The poll_idle is only applicable for x86 (acpi_driver and intel_idle= ), >> hence I suggest we move this state to these drivers, that will clean= up >> the framework code and will remove index shift macro >> CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START which IMHO is weid and prone-to-error. > > Lets see what X86 folks have to say about it and then we can do it.. > Btw, wouldn't that add some code duplication in those two drivers? Yes, certainly and that will impact also the menu select governor funct= ion: ... /* * We want to default to C1 (hlt), not to busy polling * unless the timer is happening really really soon. */ if (data->expected_us > 5 && !drv->states[CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START].disabled && dev->states_usage[CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START].disable = =3D=3D 0) data->last_state_idx =3D CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START; /* * Find the idle state with the lowest power while satisfying * our constraints. */ for (i =3D CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START; i < drv->state_count; i= ++) { struct cpuidle_state *s =3D &drv->states[i]; struct cpuidle_state_usage *su =3D &dev->states_usage[= i]; if (s->disabled || su->disable) continue; if (s->target_residency > data->predicted_us) continue; if (s->exit_latency > latency_req) continue; if (s->exit_latency * multiplier > data->predicted_us) continue; data->last_state_idx =3D i; data->exit_us =3D s->exit_latency; } =2E... --=20 Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software fo= r ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog