From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/21] cpuidle: create list of registered drivers Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 12:47:52 +0200 Message-ID: <524D4B58.8070206@linaro.org> References: <7e9565e323c1e065eeb2a2a1075967bd21ee6066.1379779777.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <5243641B.6050604@linaro.org> <5243EE02.9020207@linaro.org> <20130928213343.GA19582@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <5249C4FB.1060705@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-ee0-f43.google.com ([74.125.83.43]:32890 "EHLO mail-ee0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753552Ab3JCKry (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Oct 2013 06:47:54 -0400 Received: by mail-ee0-f43.google.com with SMTP id e52so995950eek.2 for ; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 03:47:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Paul McKenney , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Lists linaro-kernel , Patch Tracking , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List On 10/03/2013 06:38 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 1 October 2013 00:07, Daniel Lezcano w= rote: >> Interesting, thanks for the pointer. > > So, should I keep this patch with SRCU? IMHO, we should, for now, keep the code as it is and then focus on the=20 lock/refcount for drivers in a separate series. --=20 Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software fo= r ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog