From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: [RESEND] cpuidle for ARM pull request Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 18:35:24 +0200 Message-ID: <525EC04C.8020507@linaro.org> References: <51E536C5.1020609@linaro.org> <1598661.FpX5cmjM1U@vostro.rjw.lan> <51F3650B.8080708@linaro.org> <2224191.VjCA0rsPcU@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-we0-f173.google.com ([74.125.82.173]:39383 "EHLO mail-we0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760719Ab3JPQf1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:35:27 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f173.google.com with SMTP id u57so1001303wes.32 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 09:35:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2224191.VjCA0rsPcU@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux PM mailing list , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Linus Walleij , keun-o.park@windriver.com, "nsekhar@ti.com >> Sekhar Nori" On 07/27/2013 02:37 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Saturday, July 27, 2013 08:13:31 AM Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> On 07/26/2013 02:07 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Friday, July 26, 2013 12:41:09 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>>> On Friday, July 26, 2013 12:29:08 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>>>> On Friday, July 26, 2013 12:07:03 AM Daniel Lezcano wrote: >>>>>> On 07/16/2013 02:04 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >>>>>>> [ ... ] > Next time, can you please add a general description of what the patch= es do and > why they do that to the pull request? > >> I thought it would have been easier for us if I could based my PRs o= n >> top of your linux-next branch, so acting as a proxy for ARM patches.= I >> am maintaining the clocksource drivers and I am basing my tree on to= p of >> tip/core. >> >> I guess you are rebasing your tree often and this is an issue for yo= u, >> right ? > > Yes, my linux-next branch may contain commits that will be modified l= ater > (e.g. ACKs added, fixes folded in etc.). > > Anyway, as I said, as long as the material you have for me doesn't de= pend on > anything new in my tree, it's better to base it on top of an -rc kern= el. > > In case it does depend on that, I've put the entire outstanding cpuid= le > material into my pm-cpuidle branch (including your ARM commits just p= ulled). Hi Rafael, is it possible to update the pm-cpuidle branch ? so I can base my pull=20 request on it. There will be a (trivial) conflict in the Makefile and=20 Kconfig.arm if I base my PR on v3.12-rc5. Thanks -- Daniel --=20 Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software fo= r ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog