From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dirk Brandewie Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] intel_pstate updates Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 15:40:04 -0700 Message-ID: <5265AD44.6010805@gmail.com> References: <1382372435-29778-1-git-send-email-dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com> <52655686.7000406@intel.com> <4839646.Ilm2lvf4gq@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f53.google.com ([209.85.220.53]:46944 "EHLO mail-pa0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752128Ab3JUWkH (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Oct 2013 18:40:07 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id kq14so8730490pab.40 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 15:40:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4839646.Ilm2lvf4gq@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 10/21/2013 03:46 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, October 21, 2013 09:29:58 AM Dirk Brandewie wrote: >> Forgot to add this patch set is based on linux-pm/bleeding-edge >> commit 1a1da369261c3ee2c3caa078b6ace46adcdffbb6 > > So do I assume correctly that is is all 3.13 material? > > Or are patches [1-2/4] for 3.12? > 1-2 are for 3.12 3-4 are for 3.13 Baytrail support requires ther refactoring to take into account that the P state enumeration is different on Baytrail. > Rafael >