From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v5 00/14] sched: packing tasks Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:40:22 -0800 Message-ID: <52810876.2000402@linux.intel.com> References: <1382097147-30088-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <20131111163859.GE26898@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:37170 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754722Ab3KKQlo (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:41:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20131111163859.GE26898@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Zijlstra , Catalin Marinas Cc: Vincent Guittot , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Ingo Molnar , Paul Turner , Morten Rasmussen , Chris Metcalf , Tony Luck , "alex.shi@intel.com" , Preeti U Murthy , linaro-kernel , "len.brown@intel.com" , l.majewski@samsung.com, Jonathan Corbet , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Paul McKenney , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 11/11/2013 8:38 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Like the package C states on x86 -- for those to be effective the > scheduler needs to pack tasks and keep entire packages idle for as long > as possible. "package" C states on x86 are not really per package... but system wide. the name is very confusing.