From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: viresh kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: Use a sane boot frequency when booting with a mismatched bootloader configuration Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 10:54:28 +0530 Message-ID: <528C478C.1070901@linaro.org> References: <1384568535-26611-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> <20131116134445.GI11014@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> <528A27F8.3070402@ti.com> <20131118155753.GU11014@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> <528A4340.3020508@ti.com> <20131119022133.GB18434@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> <528B72C1.5060006@ti.com> <528B7CE5.5040502@ti.com> <528B884C.7070908@ti.com> <528BA355.4040008@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <528BA355.4040008@ti.com> Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Nishanth Menon Cc: Shawn Guo , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Carlos Hernandez List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 19 November 2013 11:13 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: > we depend on the first transition to take us to a sane configuration - > but we cannot predict when and if it will happen. I really believe that it happens fairly quickly, isn't it? We straight away start the sampling of load and withing few milliseconds we must be fixing the freq.. We aren't going to stay for the unknown, might be unstable, freq for ever..