From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] pm/qos: allow state control of qos class
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 00:28:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52952E90.4000604@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1385508011-26914-2-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
On 11/27/2013 12:20 AM, Jacob Pan wrote:
> When power capping or thermal control is needed, CPU QOS latency cannot
> be satisfied. This patch adds a state variable to indicate whether a QOS
> class (including all constraint requests) should be ignored.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Honestly, I don't like this. I know the motivation and what you're
trying to achieve, but I don't like the approach.
I need to think a bit more about that.
Thanks,
Rafael
> ---
> include/linux/pm_qos.h | 10 +++++++++-
> kernel/power/qos.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/pm_qos.h b/include/linux/pm_qos.h
> index 5a95013..648b50b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pm_qos.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pm_qos.h
> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
> #include <linux/device.h>
> #include <linux/workqueue.h>
>
> -enum {
> +enum pm_qos_class {
> PM_QOS_RESERVED = 0,
> PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY,
> PM_QOS_NETWORK_LATENCY,
> @@ -20,6 +20,11 @@ enum {
> PM_QOS_NUM_CLASSES,
> };
>
> +enum pm_qos_state {
> + PM_QOS_CONSTRAINT_AVAILABLE,
> + PM_QOS_CONSTRAINT_IGNORED,
> +};
> +
> enum pm_qos_flags_status {
> PM_QOS_FLAGS_UNDEFINED = -1,
> PM_QOS_FLAGS_NONE,
> @@ -77,6 +82,7 @@ struct pm_qos_constraints {
> struct plist_head list;
> s32 target_value; /* Do not change to 64 bit */
> s32 default_value;
> + enum pm_qos_state state;
> enum pm_qos_type type;
> struct blocking_notifier_head *notifiers;
> };
> @@ -123,6 +129,8 @@ int pm_qos_add_notifier(int pm_qos_class, struct notifier_block *notifier);
> int pm_qos_remove_notifier(int pm_qos_class, struct notifier_block *notifier);
> int pm_qos_request_active(struct pm_qos_request *req);
> s32 pm_qos_read_value(struct pm_qos_constraints *c);
> +void pm_qos_set_constraint_class_state(enum pm_qos_class class,
> + enum pm_qos_state state);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> enum pm_qos_flags_status __dev_pm_qos_flags(struct device *dev, s32 mask);
> diff --git a/kernel/power/qos.c b/kernel/power/qos.c
> index 8dff9b4..cf475b0 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/qos.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/qos.c
> @@ -146,6 +146,11 @@ static inline int pm_qos_get_value(struct pm_qos_constraints *c)
>
> s32 pm_qos_read_value(struct pm_qos_constraints *c)
> {
> + /* return invalid default value if constraints cannot be met, e.g.
> + * during idle injection.
> + */
> + if (c->state == PM_QOS_CONSTRAINT_IGNORED)
> + return PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE;
> return c->target_value;
> }
>
> @@ -353,6 +358,25 @@ void pm_qos_add_request(struct pm_qos_request *req,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_qos_add_request);
>
> +void pm_qos_set_constraint_class_state(enum pm_qos_class class,
> + enum pm_qos_state state)
> +{
> + struct pm_qos_constraints *c = pm_qos_array[class]->constraints;
> + unsigned long curr_value;
> +
> + if (c->state == state)
> + return;
> + curr_value = (state == PM_QOS_CONSTRAINT_IGNORED) ?
> + PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE : c->target_value;
> + c->state = state;
> +
> + /* notify existing QOS requests change */
> + blocking_notifier_call_chain(c->notifiers,
> + curr_value,
> + NULL);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_qos_set_constraint_class_state);
> +
> /**
> * pm_qos_update_request - modifies an existing qos request
> * @req : handle to list element holding a pm_qos request to use
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-26 23:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-26 23:20 [PATCH 0/3] Hook up powerclamp with PM QOS and cpuidle Jacob Pan
2013-11-26 23:20 ` [PATCH 1/3] pm/qos: allow state control of qos class Jacob Pan
2013-11-26 23:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2014-01-16 1:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-01-21 22:10 ` Jacob Pan
2014-01-21 23:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-01-21 23:47 ` Jacob Pan
2013-11-26 23:20 ` [PATCH 2/3] cpuidle: check for pm qos constraint override Jacob Pan
2013-11-26 23:20 ` [PATCH 3/3] thermal/powerclamp: communicate with pm qos when injecting idle Jacob Pan
2013-11-27 11:56 ` [PATCH 0/3] Hook up powerclamp with PM QOS and cpuidle Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-27 16:47 ` jacob pan
2013-11-27 20:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52952E90.4000604@intel.com \
--to=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).