linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: nicolas.pitre@linaro.org, mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] idle: store the idle state index in the struct rq
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 18:25:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52EA8B07.6020206@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140130163501.GG5002@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On 01/30/2014 05:35 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 05:27:54PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> struct cpuidle_state *state = &drv->states[rq->index];
>>
>> And from the state, we have the following informations:
>>
>> struct cpuidle_state {
>>
>> 	[ ... ]
>>
>>          unsigned int    exit_latency; /* in US */
>>          int             power_usage; /* in mW */
>>          unsigned int    target_residency; /* in US */
>>          bool            disabled; /* disabled on all CPUs */
>>
>> 	[ ... ]
>> };
>
> Right, but can we say that a higher index will save more power and have
> a higher exit latency? Or is a driver free to have a random mapping from
> idle_index to state?

If the driver does its own random mapping that will break the governor 
logic. So yes, the states are ordered, the higher the index is, the more 
you save power and the higher the exit latency is.

> Also, we should probably create a pretty function to get that state,
> just like you did in patch 1.

Yes, right.

>> IIRC, Alex Shi sent a patchset to improve the choosing of the idlest cpu and
>> the exit_latency was needed.
>
> Right. However if we have a 'natural' order in the state array the index
> itself might often be sufficient to find the least idle state, in this
> specific case the absolute exit latency doesn't matter, all we want is
> the lowest one.

Indeed. It could be simple as that. I feel we may need more informations 
in the future but comparing the indexes could be a nice simple and 
efficient solution.

> Not dereferencing the state array saves hitting cold cachelines.

Yeah, always good to remind that. Should keep in mind for later.

Thanks for your comments.

   -- Daniel



-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-30 17:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-30 14:09 [RFC PATCH 0/3] cpuidle/sched: move main idle function in the idle.c Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-30 14:09 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] cpuidle: split cpuidle_idle_call main function into functions Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-30 15:27   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-30 15:39     ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-30 19:39   ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-31 14:10     ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-30 14:09 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] cpuidle: move the cpuidle_idle_call function to idle.c Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-30 19:42   ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-30 14:09 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] idle: store the idle state index in the struct rq Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-30 15:31   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-30 16:27     ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-30 16:35       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-30 17:25         ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2014-01-30 17:50           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-01-30 21:02             ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-31  9:46               ` Vincent Guittot
2014-01-31 10:04               ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-01-31 10:44               ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-31  8:45           ` Preeti Murthy
2014-01-31  9:02             ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-31  9:39               ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-01-31 10:24                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-31 14:04                 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-31 14:12                   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-01-31 15:07                 ` Arjan van de Ven
2014-01-31 15:37                   ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-31 15:50                     ` Arjan van de Ven
2014-01-31 16:35                       ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-31 16:42                         ` Arjan van de Ven
2014-01-31 18:19                       ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-02-01  6:00                         ` Brown, Len
2014-02-01 15:31                           ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-02-01 19:39                             ` Brown, Len
2014-02-01 20:13                               ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-02-01 15:40                           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-02-03 12:54                         ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-02-03 14:38                           ` Arjan van de Ven
2014-02-03 14:56                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-03 16:17                               ` Arjan van de Ven
2014-02-11 16:41                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-11 17:12                                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2014-02-11 19:47                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-12 15:16                                 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-02-12 16:14                                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2014-02-12 17:37                                     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-02-12 19:05                                       ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-02-04  9:14                               ` Ingo Molnar
2014-02-04 14:53                                 ` Arjan van de Ven
2014-02-04 14:56                                 ` Arjan van de Ven
2014-02-03 14:58                           ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-31 10:15             ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-02-03  6:33               ` Preeti U Murthy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52EA8B07.6020206@linaro.org \
    --to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).