From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Subject: Re: [PATCH 35/51] acpi-cpufreq: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 21:35:51 +0530 Message-ID: <52F3B2DF.3070104@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20140205220251.19080.92336.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> <20140205221052.19080.77507.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> <6272120.pzpJuaTe2d@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from e23smtp08.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.141]:48383 "EHLO e23smtp08.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751863AbaBFQLQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Feb 2014 11:11:16 -0500 Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp08.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 02:11:15 +1000 In-Reply-To: <6272120.pzpJuaTe2d@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: paulus@samba.org, oleg@redhat.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@kernel.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, tj@kernel.org, walken@google.com, ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Viresh Kumar , cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 02/06/2014 06:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, February 06, 2014 03:40:53 AM Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote: >> Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform >> initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown >> below: >> >> get_online_cpus(); >> >> for_each_online_cpu(cpu) >> init_cpu(cpu); >> >> register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier); >> >> put_online_cpus(); >> >> This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the >> cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently >> with CPU hotplug operations). >> >> Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback >> registration is: >> >> cpu_maps_update_begin(); >> >> for_each_online_cpu(cpu) >> init_cpu(cpu); >> >> /* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */ >> __register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier); >> >> cpu_maps_update_done(); >> >> >> Fix the acpi-cpufreq code by using this latter form of callback registration. >> >> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" >> Cc: Viresh Kumar >> Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org >> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org >> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat > > Looks OK to me. How does it depend on the rest of your series? > Thank you! Same here, every patch depends only on the first patch in the series. (Except the raid5 and the xen/balloon patches which don't have any dependency). But I'll be posting a v2 of this patchset soon with a rename of the API.. Regards, Srivatsa S. Bhat >> --- >> >> drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 7 ++++--- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c >> index 18448a7..e2eb471 100644 >> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c >> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c >> @@ -907,15 +907,16 @@ static void __init acpi_cpufreq_boost_init(void) >> >> acpi_cpufreq_driver.boost_supported = true; >> acpi_cpufreq_driver.boost_enabled = boost_state(0); >> - get_online_cpus(); >> + >> + cpu_maps_update_begin(); >> >> /* Force all MSRs to the same value */ >> boost_set_msrs(acpi_cpufreq_driver.boost_enabled, >> cpu_online_mask); >> >> - register_cpu_notifier(&boost_nb); >> + __register_cpu_notifier(&boost_nb); >> >> - put_online_cpus(); >> + cpu_maps_update_done(); >> } >> } >> >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Regards, Srivatsa S. Bhat