From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Tuukka Tikkanen <tuukka.tikkanen@linaro.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Cpuidle: Minor fixes
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 22:24:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <530BB899.4060803@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1393223377-5744-1-git-send-email-tuukka.tikkanen@linaro.org>
On 02/24/2014 07:29 AM, Tuukka Tikkanen wrote:
> This set of patches makes some minor changes to menu governor and the poll
> idle state.
>
> Patch 1 is simply a rename of a variable to make the name better represent
> the contained information.
>
> Patch 2 fixes calculating actual residency in cases where the entered state
> is different from the state decided by the menu governor.
>
> Patch 3 makes sure the menu governor timer coefficients are not updated
> with values that might cause a coefficient to reach a value greater than
> unity.
>
> Patch 4 fixes calculation actual residency in cases where the entered state
> does not support measuring residency. In such cases the residency time
> is taken from time remaining until next timer expiry. The timer is expected
> to go off at the start of exit latency, not after it. Therefore the exit
> latency must not be substracted from the assumed value.
>
> Patch 5 moves the performance multiplier based comparison out of the state
> selection loop by changing it into a latency requirement. This allows
> using a generic state selection function accepting only (duration, latency)
> tuple as input. The change is possible by noting that performance multiplier
> is used only to check for a minimum predicted idle duration to exit latency
> ratio. As predicted idle duration is a constant for the loop, the maximum
> allowed latency can be calculated outside of the loop.
>
> Patch 6 prevents using negative values from tick_nohz_get_sleep_length()
> in the menu governor. If unchecked, the negative values are used as huge
> unsigned values. Negative values occur fairly often (e.g. on x86_64 I've
> seen this happen several times per minute) on a busy system, allowing
> the deepest state to win the selection while the shallowest should be picked.
>
> Patch 7 adds CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID to poll_idle. I do not know of any
> platfrom where cpu_relax() would break ktime_get() and in fact poll_idle
> uses ktime_get itself.
> (Note: poll_idle updates dev->last_residency for some reason. Does it ever
> get called without going through cpuidle_enter_state, which will overwrite
> the value? Even if some state redirects to this state, the call will
> eventually return to the framework. The redundant time measurement could
> be removed, unless there is some obscure way of getting called on some
> platform that I am unable to figure out.)
>
> Tuukka Tikkanen (7):
> Cpuidle: rename expected_us to next_timer_us in menu governor
> Cpuidle: Use actual state latency in menu governor
> Cpuidle: Ensure menu coefficients stay within domain
> Cpuidle: Do not substract exit latency from assumed sleep length
> Cpuidle: Move perf multiplier calculation out of the selection loop
> Cpuidle: Deal with timer expiring in the past
> Cpuidle: poll state can measure residency
>
> drivers/cpuidle/driver.c | 2 +-
> drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
You should put Arjan van de Ven in Cc for the menu governor changes.
Thanks
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-24 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-24 6:29 [PATCH 0/7] Cpuidle: Minor fixes Tuukka Tikkanen
2014-02-24 6:29 ` [PATCH 1/7] Cpuidle: rename expected_us to next_timer_us in menu governor Tuukka Tikkanen
2014-02-24 16:52 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-03-05 22:26 ` Len Brown
2014-02-24 6:29 ` [PATCH 2/7] Cpuidle: Use actual state latency " Tuukka Tikkanen
2014-02-24 22:35 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-02-24 6:29 ` [PATCH 3/7] Cpuidle: Ensure menu coefficients stay within domain Tuukka Tikkanen
2014-02-24 16:57 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-02-24 6:29 ` [PATCH 4/7] Cpuidle: Do not substract exit latency from assumed sleep length Tuukka Tikkanen
2014-02-24 6:29 ` [PATCH 5/7] Cpuidle: Move perf multiplier calculation out of the selection loop Tuukka Tikkanen
2014-02-24 6:29 ` [PATCH 6/7] Cpuidle: Deal with timer expiring in the past Tuukka Tikkanen
2014-02-24 17:05 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-02-25 0:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-03-06 7:41 ` Len Brown
2014-03-07 3:09 ` Len Brown
2014-03-10 10:54 ` Tuukka Tikkanen
2014-03-21 23:10 ` Len Brown
2014-02-24 6:29 ` [PATCH 7/7] Cpuidle: poll state can measure residency Tuukka Tikkanen
2014-02-25 10:56 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-02-25 15:40 ` Tuukka Tikkanen
2014-02-24 21:24 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2014-02-26 0:46 ` [PATCH 0/7] Cpuidle: Minor fixes Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-03-07 12:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-03-11 19:35 ` Rik van Riel
2014-03-11 20:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-03-11 21:06 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=530BB899.4060803@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tuukka.tikkanen@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).