From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_pkg_temp_thermal: Do not expose as a hwmon device
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 09:44:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53136E00.2030000@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140302180452.73fa2f8a@endymion.delvare>
On 03/02/2014 09:04 AM, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 08:03:28 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 03/02/2014 06:33 AM, Jean Delvare wrote:
>>> The temperature value reported by x86_pkg_temp_thermal is already
>>> reported by the coretemp driver. So, do not expose this thermal zone
>>> as a hwmon device, because it would be redundant.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
>>> Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
>>
>> Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>>
>> Does that make the "Fix thermal zone type" patch unnecessary ?
>
> I think both patches are needed, as type "pkg-temp-0" is wrong anyway,
> regardless of the hwmon side of things. But it is less important with
> this patch applied, indeed.
>
>> If so, this patch would be a candidate for stable.
>
> I'm still not 100% certain we want either patch in stable. After all,
> they aren't fixing any critical bug, and they change user interfaces so
> they could impact some users in unpredictable ways.
>
Ok.
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-02 17:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-02 14:33 [PATCH] x86_pkg_temp_thermal: Do not expose as a hwmon device Jean Delvare
2014-03-02 16:03 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-03-02 17:04 ` Jean Delvare
2014-03-02 17:44 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2014-03-07 8:07 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53136E00.2030000@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=eduardo.valentin@ti.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).