From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stratos Karafotis Subject: [PATCH 02/20] cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Use cpufreq_for_each_entry macro for iteration Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 00:08:06 +0300 Message-ID: <534C4E36.9060208@semaphore.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar Cc: "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , LKML List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org The cpufreq core supports the cpufreq_for_each_entry macro helper for iteration over the cpufreq_frequency_table, so use it. It should have no functional changes. Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis --- drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c index 000e4e0..12a5750 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static unsigned extract_io(u32 value, struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data) static unsigned extract_msr(u32 msr, struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data) { - int i; + struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos; struct acpi_processor_performance *perf; if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD) @@ -223,11 +223,11 @@ static unsigned extract_msr(u32 msr, struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data) perf = data->acpi_data; - for (i = 0; data->freq_table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; i++) { - if (msr == perf->states[data->freq_table[i].driver_data].status) - return data->freq_table[i].frequency; + cpufreq_for_each_entry(pos, data->freq_table) { + if (msr == perf->states[pos->driver_data].status) + return pos->frequency; } - return data->freq_table[0].frequency; + return data->freq_table->frequency; } static unsigned extract_freq(u32 val, struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data) -- 1.9.0