From: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
To: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [query] cpufreq: intel_pstate: diverge of current_pstate and actual P state
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 00:11:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <537BC4E8.60500@semaphore.gr> (raw)
Hi all,
Currently, we use the current P state to calculate the busy_scaled factor
and then the next P state.
We also read the MSR_TURBO_RATIO_LIMIT to get the turbo ratio limit as the
turbo_pstate. But, we always read bits 7:0 ("Maximum turbo ratio limit of 1
core active").
So, in processor families that have different turbo ratio limit
depending on active cores the current P state as it's considered
by the driver might be different from the actual current P state.
For example, I use an i7-3770 which reports as maximum turbo ratio limits
with 1/2/3/4 actives cores the values 39/39/38/37. So, in some cases
we will calculate as the next P state the value 39. If the active cores
at that time was 3 or 4 the actual P state will be 38 or 37.
The current_pstate variable will have the value 39 and this will lead
to wrong calculation at the next sampling interval.
Trying to find a solution to the above I couldn't find an MSR that
we could use to get the number of active cores and use the respective
turbo ratio limit.
I also thought to use the IA32_PERF_STATUS to get the current P state
and use it in the calculations, but its scope is per core and not per
thread.
Am I missing something? If the above is correct, any idea how this
could be resolved?
Thanks in advance,
Stratos
next reply other threads:[~2014-05-20 21:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-20 21:11 Stratos Karafotis [this message]
2014-05-20 21:31 ` [query] cpufreq: intel_pstate: diverge of current_pstate and actual P state Dirk Brandewie
2014-05-20 21:59 ` Stratos Karafotis
2014-05-20 23:01 ` Dirk Brandewie
2014-05-21 17:22 ` Stratos Karafotis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=537BC4E8.60500@semaphore.gr \
--to=stratosk@semaphore.gr \
--cc=dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).