From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>, kgene.kim@samsung.com
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
ccross@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Exynos4: cpuidle: support dual CPUs with AFTR state
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 11:30:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53884FD2.7020700@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53594D17.6020107@samsung.com>
On 04/24/2014 07:42 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Please see my comments inline.
>
> Btw. Please fix your e-mail composer to properly wrap your messages
> around 7xth column, as otherwise they're hard to read.
>
> On 04.04.2014 11:48, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> The following driver is for exynos4210. I did not yet finished the
>> other boards, so
>> I created a specific driver for 4210 which could be merged later.
>>
>> The driver is based on Colin Cross's driver found at:
>>
>> https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/exynos/+/e686b1ec67423c40b4fdf811f9a4dfa3b393a010%5E%5E!/
>>
>>
>> This one was based on a 3.4 kernel and an old API.
>>
>> It has been refreshed, simplified and based on the recent code cleanup
>> I sent
>> today.
>>
>> The AFTR could be entered when all the cpus (except cpu0) are down. In
>> order to
>> reach this situation, the couple idle states are used.
>>
>> There is a sync barrier at the entry and the exit of the low power
>> function. So
>> all cpus will enter and exit the function at the same time.
>>
>> At this point, CPU0 knows the other cpu will power down itself. CPU0
>> waits for
>> the CPU1 to be powered down and then initiate the AFTR power down
>> sequence.
>>
>> No interrupts are handled by CPU1, this is why we switch to the timer
>> broadcast
>> even if the local timer is not impacted by the idle state.
>>
>> When CPU0 wakes up, it powers up CPU1 and waits for it to boot. Then
>> they both
>> exit the idle function.
>>
>> This driver allows the exynos4210 to have the same power consumption
>> at idle
>> time than the one when we have to unplug CPU1 in order to let CPU0 to
>> reach
>> the AFTR state.
>>
>> This patch is a RFC because, we have to find a way to remove the macros
>> definitions and cpu powerdown function without pulling the arch dependent
>> headers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c | 11 +-
>> drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm | 8 ++
>> drivers/cpuidle/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-exynos4210.c | 226
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
[ ... ]
> Otherwise, I quite like the whole idea. I need to play a bit with CPU
> hotplug and PMU to verify that things couldn't really be simplified a
> bit, but in general this looks reasonably.
Hi Tomasz,
did you have time to look at this simplification ?
Thanks
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-30 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-04 9:48 [PATCH] Exynos4: cpuidle: support dual CPUs with AFTR state Daniel Lezcano
2014-04-04 14:25 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-04-15 6:37 ` Lukasz Majewski
2014-04-15 15:23 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-04-15 15:54 ` Lukasz Majewski
2014-04-15 16:38 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-04-15 22:19 ` Lukasz Majewski
2014-04-24 17:42 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-04-25 7:52 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-05-30 9:30 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2014-05-30 11:34 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-30 13:53 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-07-16 17:34 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-07-21 11:06 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-08-14 10:55 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-08-14 23:57 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-06-11 8:50 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-06-13 22:43 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-06-25 7:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53884FD2.7020700@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=ccross@google.com \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=t.figa@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).