From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomasz Figa Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] ARM: EXYNOS: PM: replace EXYNOS_BOOT_VECTOR_* macros by static inlines Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 15:05:40 +0200 Message-ID: <538C76A4.8050508@gmail.com> References: <1401712543-14281-1-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> <1401712543-14281-5-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com ([209.85.212.176]:52682 "EHLO mail-wi0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753961AbaFBNF7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2014 09:05:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1401712543-14281-5-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Kukjin Kim Cc: Daniel Lezcano , Tomasz Figa , Sachin Kamat , Viresh Kumar , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Kyungmin Park , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org Hi, On 02.06.2014 14:35, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > Replace EXYNOS_BOOT_VECTOR_ADDR and EXYNOS_BOOT_VECTOR_FLAG macros > by exynos_boot_vector_addr() and exynos_boot_vector_flag() static > inlines. > > This patch shouldn't cause any functionality changes. > > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > Acked-by: Kyungmin Park > --- > arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c > index 87c0d34..cf09383 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c > @@ -166,12 +166,23 @@ int exynos_cluster_power_state(int cluster) > S5P_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN); > } > > -#define EXYNOS_BOOT_VECTOR_ADDR (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_1 ? \ > - S5P_INFORM7 : (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_0 ? \ > - (sysram_base_addr + 0x24) : S5P_INFORM0)) > -#define EXYNOS_BOOT_VECTOR_FLAG (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_1 ? \ > - S5P_INFORM6 : (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_0 ? \ > - (sysram_base_addr + 0x20) : S5P_INFORM1)) > +static inline void __iomem *exynos_boot_vector_addr(void) > +{ > + if (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_1) > + return S5P_INFORM7; > + else if (samsung_rev() == EXYNOS4210_REV_1_0) > + return sysram_base_addr + 0x24; > + return S5P_INFORM0; I know this is not strictly related to this patch, but isn't a check whether the SoC is Exynos4210 also needed, before comparing the revision with Exynos4210-specific values? Otherwise looks good. Best regards, Tomasz