From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomasz Figa Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] ARM: EXYNOS: PM: use c15resume firmware method if secure firmware is enabled Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 15:07:46 +0200 Message-ID: <538C7722.8020706@gmail.com> References: <1401712543-14281-1-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> <1401712543-14281-6-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com ([209.85.212.176]:54106 "EHLO mail-wi0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754176AbaFBNIB (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2014 09:08:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1401712543-14281-6-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Kukjin Kim Cc: Daniel Lezcano , Tomasz Figa , Sachin Kamat , Viresh Kumar , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Kyungmin Park , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org Hi, On 02.06.2014 14:35, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > Use c15resume firmware method instead of accessing the registers > directly in exynos_cpu_restore_register() if secure firmware is > enabled. This affects both PM resume method and cpuidle AFTR mode. > > This patch shouldn't cause any functionality changes on boards that > don't use secure firmware. > > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > Acked-by: Kyungmin Park > --- > arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c > index cf09383..aeff99e 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > > #include > #include > @@ -232,6 +233,9 @@ static void exynos_cpu_restore_register(void) > { > unsigned long tmp; > > + if (call_firmware_op(c15resume, save_arm_register) == 0) > + return; > + As I mentioned in my comments to patch 2/7, instead of introducing heavily SoC-specific operations, I'd rather add more general suspend and resume firmware operations which would take care of both saving and restoring those registers. Best regards, Tomasz