From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laxman Dewangan Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: of: look for sensor driver parent node if device node missing Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 13:52:00 +0530 Message-ID: <53D213A8.6000506@nvidia.com> References: <1405336354-31310-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <53D0D694.9040101@nvidia.com> <744357E9AAD1214791ACBA4B0B90926301396F53@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <744357E9AAD1214791ACBA4B0B90926301396F53@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Zhang, Rui" , "eduardo.valentin@gmail.com" Cc: "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Thanks Rui. It seems I have put the wrong email-id for Eduardo (which I got from get_maintainer) and the original patch not reached to Eduardo. Do I need to re-post patch? Thanks, Laxman On Thursday 24 July 2014 08:45 PM, Zhang, Rui wrote: > Hi, Laxman, > > As Eduardo is the of thermal author and maintainer, I will take your patch only if you can get ACK from Eduardo. > > Eduardo, > Do you have any comments on this? > > Thanks, > rui > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Laxman Dewangan [mailto:ldewangan@nvidia.com] >> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 5:49 PM >> To: Zhang, Rui; eduardo.valentin@ti.com >> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: of: look for sensor driver parent node if >> device node missing >> Importance: High >> >> On Monday 14 July 2014 04:42 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: >>> There are some mfd devices which supports junction thermal interrupt >>> like ams,AS3722. The DT binding of these devices are defined as the >>> flat and drivers for sub module of such devices are registered as the >>> mfd_add_devices. In this method, the sub devices registered as >>> platform driver and these do not have the of_node pointer on their >>> device structure. In this case, use the parent of_node pointer to get >>> the required of_node pointer. >>> >> Any comment please?