From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] arm: dts: qcom: Add SPM device bindings for 8974 Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 10:21:17 -0700 Message-ID: <5422FD8D.8080307@codeaurora.org> References: <1411516281-58328-1-git-send-email-lina.iyer@linaro.org> <1411516281-58328-3-git-send-email-lina.iyer@linaro.org> <5422621E.2050509@smartplayin.com> <20140924134939.GA422@ilina-mac> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140924134939.GA422@ilina-mac> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Lina Iyer , Pramod Gurav Cc: galak@codeaurora.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, khilman@linaro.org, msivasub@codeaurora.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 09/24/14 06:49, Lina Iyer wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24 2014 at 00:14 -0600, Pramod Gurav wrote: >> Hi Lina, >> >> On Wednesday 24 September 2014 05:21 AM, Lina Iyer wrote: >>> Add SPM device bindings for QCOM 8974 based cpus. SPM is the sub-system >>> power manager and controls the logic around the cores (cpu and L2). >>> >>> Each core has an instance of SPM and controls only that core. Each cpu >>> SPM is configured to support WFI and SPC (standalone-power collapse). >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer >>> --- >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974-pm.dtsi | 69 >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi | 10 +++-- >>> 2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974-pm.dtsi >> >> >> >>> +}; >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi >>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi >>> index 69dca2a..0580bc2 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi >>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi >>> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ >>> #size-cells = <0>; >>> interrupts = <1 9 0xf04>; >>> >>> - cpu@0 { >>> + CPU0: cpu@0 { >> Lina, Stephen boyd has sent some DT change for krait-cpufreq which also >> renames this node to "cpu0: cpu@0". If you both could sync up and agree >> on a common naming('cpu0' with caps or not caps) for this node. >> > Sure. Will work with Stephen on that. > This doesn't seem like a big deal. I imagine Kumar can resolve the conflict if the two patches merge at the same time. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation