[PATCH v11 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for exynos platforms

[PATCH v11 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for exynos platforms

[Thomas Abraham]

Changes since v10:
- Rebased on top of v3.18-rc1

This patch series removes the use of Exynos4210 and Exynos5250 specific cpufreq
drivers and enables the use of cpufreq-dt driver for these platforms. This
series also enables cpufreq support for Exynos5420 using arm_big_little cpufreq
driver.

This patch series is based and tested on v3.18-rc1 and depends on the patch
- "clk: exynos4: remove duplicate div_core2 divider clock instantiation"
  (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg34859.html)
  This patch has been merged in "arm-soc/samsung/dt3" branch of arm-soc tree.

Re: [PATCH v11 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for exynos platforms

[Tomasz Figa]

On 20.10.2014 13:41, Thomas Abraham wrote:
> Changes since v10:
> - Rebased on top of v3.18-rc1
> 
> This patch series removes the use of Exynos4210 and Exynos5250 specific cpufreq
> drivers and enables the use of cpufreq-dt driver for these platforms. This
> series also enables cpufreq support for Exynos5420 using arm_big_little cpufreq
> driver.
> 
> This patch series is based and tested on v3.18-rc1 and depends on the patch
> - "clk: exynos4: remove duplicate div_core2 divider clock instantiation"
>   (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg34859.html)
>   This patch has been merged in "arm-soc/samsung/dt3" branch of arm-soc tree.
> 

That patch actually went through clock tree, but it doesn't matter,
because AFAIK all the dependencies for this series are already in
3.18-rc1. I'll try to apply it in next days

Best regards,
Tomasz

Re: [PATCH v11 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for exynos platforms

[Thomas Abraham]

Hi Tomasz,

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 20.10.2014 13:41, Thomas Abraham wrote:
>> Changes since v10:
>> - Rebased on top of v3.18-rc1
>>
>> This patch series removes the use of Exynos4210 and Exynos5250 specific cpufreq
>> drivers and enables the use of cpufreq-dt driver for these platforms. This
>> series also enables cpufreq support for Exynos5420 using arm_big_little cpufreq
>> driver.
>>
>> This patch series is based and tested on v3.18-rc1 and depends on the patch
>> - "clk: exynos4: remove duplicate div_core2 divider clock instantiation"
>>   (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg34859.html)
>>   This patch has been merged in "arm-soc/samsung/dt3" branch of arm-soc tree.
>>
>
> That patch actually went through clock tree, but it doesn't matter,
> because AFAIK all the dependencies for this series are already in
> 3.18-rc1. I'll try to apply it in next days

Thanks. The patch "clk: exynos4: remove duplicate div_core2 divider
clock instantiation" is not available in 3.18-rc1. So for testing, I
picked this patch from samsung/dt3 branch from arm-soc tree.

Regards,
Thomas.


>
> Best regards,
> Tomasz
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH v11 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for exynos platforms

[Tomasz Figa]

On 20.10.2014 13:48, Thomas Abraham wrote:
> Hi Tomasz,
> 
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 20.10.2014 13:41, Thomas Abraham wrote:
>>> Changes since v10:
>>> - Rebased on top of v3.18-rc1
>>>
>>> This patch series removes the use of Exynos4210 and Exynos5250 specific cpufreq
>>> drivers and enables the use of cpufreq-dt driver for these platforms. This
>>> series also enables cpufreq support for Exynos5420 using arm_big_little cpufreq
>>> driver.
>>>
>>> This patch series is based and tested on v3.18-rc1 and depends on the patch
>>> - "clk: exynos4: remove duplicate div_core2 divider clock instantiation"
>>>   (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg34859.html)
>>>   This patch has been merged in "arm-soc/samsung/dt3" branch of arm-soc tree.
>>>
>>
>> That patch actually went through clock tree, but it doesn't matter,
>> because AFAIK all the dependencies for this series are already in
>> 3.18-rc1. I'll try to apply it in next days
> 
> Thanks. The patch "clk: exynos4: remove duplicate div_core2 divider
> clock instantiation" is not available in 3.18-rc1. So for testing, I
> picked this patch from samsung/dt3 branch from arm-soc tree.

Hmm? I can see it there:

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/log/drivers/clk/samsung?id=v3.18-rc1

Best regards,
Tomasz

[PATCH v11 1/6] clk: samsung: add infrastructure to register cpu clocks

[Thomas Abraham]

The CPU clock provider supplies the clock to the CPU clock domain. The
composition and organization of the CPU clock provider could vary among
Exynos SoCs. A CPU clock provider can be composed of clock mux, dividers
and gates. This patch defines a new clock type for CPU clock provider and
adds infrastructure to register the CPU clock providers for Samsung
platforms.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Tested-by: Chander Kashyap <k.chander@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile  |    2 +-
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.c |  335 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.h |   91 +++++++++++
 3 files changed, 427 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.h

diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile b/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile
index 6fb4bc6..8909c93 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 # Samsung Clock specific Makefile
 #
 
-obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK)	+= clk.o clk-pll.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK)	+= clk.o clk-pll.o clk-cpu.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS3250)	+= clk-exynos3250.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS4)	+= clk-exynos4.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5250)	+= clk-exynos5250.o
diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..009a21b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.c
@@ -0,0 +1,335 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2014 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
+ * Author: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This file contains the utility function to register CPU clock for Samsung
+ * Exynos platforms. A CPU clock is defined as a clock supplied to a CPU or a
+ * group of CPUs. The CPU clock is typically derived from a hierarchy of clock
+ * blocks which includes mux and divider blocks. There are a number of other
+ * auxiliary clocks supplied to the CPU domain such as the debug blocks and AXI
+ * clock for CPU domain. The rates of these auxiliary clocks are related to the
+ * CPU clock rate and this relation is usually specified in the hardware manual
+ * of the SoC or supplied after the SoC characterization.
+ *
+ * The below implementation of the CPU clock allows the rate changes of the CPU
+ * clock and the corresponding rate changes of the auxillary clocks of the CPU
+ * domain. The platform clock driver provides a clock register configuration
+ * for each configurable rate which is then used to program the clock hardware
+ * registers to acheive a fast co-oridinated rate change for all the CPU domain
+ * clocks.
+ *
+ * On a rate change request for the CPU clock, the rate change is propagated
+ * upto the PLL supplying the clock to the CPU domain clock blocks. While the
+ * CPU domain PLL is reconfigured, the CPU domain clocks are driven using an
+ * alternate clock source. If required, the alternate clock source is divided
+ * down in order to keep the output clock rate within the previous OPP limits.
+*/
+
+#include <linux/errno.h>
+#include "clk-cpu.h"
+
+#define E4210_SRC_CPU		0x0
+#define E4210_STAT_CPU		0x200
+#define E4210_DIV_CPU0		0x300
+#define E4210_DIV_CPU1		0x304
+#define E4210_DIV_STAT_CPU0	0x400
+#define E4210_DIV_STAT_CPU1	0x404
+
+#define E4210_DIV0_RATIO0_MASK	0x7
+#define E4210_DIV1_HPM_MASK	(0x7 << 4)
+#define E4210_DIV1_COPY_MASK	(0x7 << 0)
+#define E4210_MUX_HPM_MASK	(1 << 20)
+#define E4210_DIV0_ATB_SHIFT	16
+#define E4210_DIV0_ATB_MASK	(DIV_MASK << E4210_DIV0_ATB_SHIFT)
+
+#define MAX_DIV			8
+#define DIV_MASK		7
+#define DIV_MASK_ALL		0xffffffff
+#define MUX_MASK		7
+
+/*
+ * Helper function to wait until divider(s) have stabilized after the divider
+ * value has changed.
+ */
+static void wait_until_divider_stable(void __iomem *div_reg, unsigned long mask)
+{
+	unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(10);
+
+	do {
+		if (!(readl(div_reg) & mask))
+			return;
+	} while (time_before(jiffies, timeout));
+
+	pr_err("%s: timeout in divider stablization\n", __func__);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Helper function to wait until mux has stabilized after the mux selection
+ * value was changed.
+ */
+static void wait_until_mux_stable(void __iomem *mux_reg, u32 mux_pos,
+					unsigned long mux_value)
+{
+	unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(10);
+
+	do {
+		if (((readl(mux_reg) >> mux_pos) & MUX_MASK) == mux_value)
+			return;
+	} while (time_before(jiffies, timeout));
+
+	pr_err("%s: re-parenting mux timed-out\n", __func__);
+}
+
+/* common round rate callback useable for all types of CPU clocks */
+static long exynos_cpuclk_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
+			unsigned long drate, unsigned long *prate)
+{
+	struct clk *parent = __clk_get_parent(hw->clk);
+	*prate = __clk_round_rate(parent, drate);
+	return *prate;
+}
+
+/* common recalc rate callback useable for all types of CPU clocks */
+static unsigned long exynos_cpuclk_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
+			unsigned long parent_rate)
+{
+	/*
+	 * The CPU clock output (armclk) rate is the same as its parent
+	 * rate. Although there exist certain dividers inside the CPU
+	 * clock block that could be used to divide the parent clock,
+	 * the driver does not make use of them currently, except during
+	 * frequency transitions.
+	 */
+	return parent_rate;
+}
+
+static const struct clk_ops exynos_cpuclk_clk_ops = {
+	.recalc_rate = exynos_cpuclk_recalc_rate,
+	.round_rate = exynos_cpuclk_round_rate,
+};
+
+/*
+ * Helper function to set the 'safe' dividers for the CPU clock. The parameters
+ * div and mask contain the divider value and the register bit mask of the
+ * dividers to be programmed.
+ */
+static void exynos_set_safe_div(void __iomem *base, unsigned long div,
+					unsigned long mask)
+{
+	unsigned long div0;
+
+	div0 = readl(base + E4210_DIV_CPU0);
+	div0 = (div0 & ~mask) | (div & mask);
+	writel(div0, base + E4210_DIV_CPU0);
+	wait_until_divider_stable(base + E4210_DIV_STAT_CPU0, mask);
+}
+
+/* handler for pre-rate change notification from parent clock */
+static int exynos_cpuclk_pre_rate_change(struct clk_notifier_data *ndata,
+			struct exynos_cpuclk *cpuclk, void __iomem *base)
+{
+	const struct exynos_cpuclk_cfg_data *cfg_data = cpuclk->cfg;
+	unsigned long alt_prate = clk_get_rate(cpuclk->alt_parent);
+	unsigned long alt_div = 0, alt_div_mask = DIV_MASK;
+	unsigned long div0, div1 = 0, mux_reg;
+
+	/* find out the divider values to use for clock data */
+	while ((cfg_data->prate * 1000) != ndata->new_rate) {
+		if (cfg_data->prate == 0)
+			return -EINVAL;
+		cfg_data++;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * For the selected PLL clock frequency, get the pre-defined divider
+	 * values. If the clock for sclk_hpm is not sourced from apll, then
+	 * the values for DIV_COPY and DIV_HPM dividers need not be set.
+	 */
+	div0 = cfg_data->div0;
+	if (test_bit(CLK_CPU_HAS_DIV1, &cpuclk->flags)) {
+		div1 = cfg_data->div1;
+		if (readl(base + E4210_SRC_CPU) & E4210_MUX_HPM_MASK)
+			div1 = readl(base + E4210_DIV_CPU1) &
+				(E4210_DIV1_HPM_MASK | E4210_DIV1_COPY_MASK);
+	}
+
+	spin_lock(cpuclk->lock);
+
+	/*
+	 * If the new and old parent clock speed is less than the clock speed
+	 * of the alternate parent, then it should be ensured that at no point
+	 * the armclk speed is more than the old_prate until the dividers are
+	 * set.
+	 */
+	if (alt_prate > ndata->old_rate) {
+		alt_div =  DIV_ROUND_UP(alt_prate, ndata->old_rate) - 1;
+		WARN_ON(alt_div >= MAX_DIV);
+
+		if (test_bit(CLK_CPU_NEEDS_DEBUG_ALT_DIV, &cpuclk->flags)) {
+			/*
+			 * In Exynos4210, ATB clock parent is also mout_core. So
+			 * ATB clock also needs to be mantained at safe speed.
+			 */
+			alt_div |= E4210_DIV0_ATB_MASK;
+			alt_div_mask |= E4210_DIV0_ATB_MASK;
+		}
+		exynos_set_safe_div(base, alt_div, alt_div_mask);
+		div0 |= alt_div;
+	}
+
+	/* select sclk_mpll as the alternate parent */
+	mux_reg = readl(base + E4210_SRC_CPU);
+	writel(mux_reg | (1 << 16), base + E4210_SRC_CPU);
+	wait_until_mux_stable(base + E4210_STAT_CPU, 16, 2);
+
+	/* alternate parent is active now. set the dividers */
+	writel(div0, base + E4210_DIV_CPU0);
+	wait_until_divider_stable(base + E4210_DIV_STAT_CPU0, DIV_MASK_ALL);
+
+	if (test_bit(CLK_CPU_HAS_DIV1, &cpuclk->flags)) {
+		writel(div1, base + E4210_DIV_CPU1);
+		wait_until_divider_stable(base + E4210_DIV_STAT_CPU1,
+				DIV_MASK_ALL);
+	}
+
+	spin_unlock(cpuclk->lock);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/* handler for post-rate change notification from parent clock */
+static int exynos_cpuclk_post_rate_change(struct clk_notifier_data *ndata,
+			struct exynos_cpuclk *cpuclk, void __iomem *base)
+{
+	const struct exynos_cpuclk_cfg_data *cfg_data = cpuclk->cfg;
+	unsigned long div = 0, div_mask = DIV_MASK;
+	unsigned long mux_reg;
+
+	spin_lock(cpuclk->lock);
+
+	/* select mout_apll as the alternate parent */
+	mux_reg = readl(base + E4210_SRC_CPU);
+	writel(mux_reg & ~(1 << 16), base + E4210_SRC_CPU);
+	wait_until_mux_stable(base + E4210_STAT_CPU, 16, 1);
+
+	if (test_bit(CLK_CPU_NEEDS_DEBUG_ALT_DIV, &cpuclk->flags)) {
+		/* find out the divider values to use for clock data */
+		while ((cfg_data->prate * 1000) != ndata->new_rate) {
+			if (cfg_data->prate == 0)
+				return -EINVAL;
+			cfg_data++;
+		}
+
+		div |= (cfg_data->div0 & E4210_DIV0_ATB_MASK);
+		div_mask |= E4210_DIV0_ATB_MASK;
+	}
+
+	exynos_set_safe_div(base, div, div_mask);
+	spin_unlock(cpuclk->lock);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * This notifier function is called for the pre-rate and post-rate change
+ * notifications of the parent clock of cpuclk.
+ */
+static int exynos_cpuclk_notifier_cb(struct notifier_block *nb,
+				unsigned long event, void *data)
+{
+	struct clk_notifier_data *ndata = data;
+	struct exynos_cpuclk *cpuclk;
+	void __iomem *base;
+	int err = 0;
+
+	cpuclk = container_of(nb, struct exynos_cpuclk, clk_nb);
+	base = cpuclk->ctrl_base;
+
+	if (event == PRE_RATE_CHANGE)
+		err = exynos_cpuclk_pre_rate_change(ndata, cpuclk, base);
+	else if (event == POST_RATE_CHANGE)
+		err = exynos_cpuclk_post_rate_change(ndata, cpuclk, base);
+
+	return notifier_from_errno(err);
+}
+
+/* helper function to register a CPU clock */
+int __init exynos_register_cpu_clock(struct samsung_clk_provider *ctx,
+		unsigned int lookup_id, const char *name, const char *parent,
+		const char *alt_parent, unsigned long offset,
+		const struct exynos_cpuclk_cfg_data *cfg,
+		unsigned long num_cfgs, unsigned long flags)
+{
+	struct exynos_cpuclk *cpuclk;
+	struct clk_init_data init;
+	struct clk *clk;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	cpuclk = kzalloc(sizeof(*cpuclk), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!cpuclk)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	init.name = name;
+	init.flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT;
+	init.parent_names = &parent;
+	init.num_parents = 1;
+	init.ops = &exynos_cpuclk_clk_ops;
+
+	cpuclk->hw.init = &init;
+	cpuclk->ctrl_base = ctx->reg_base + offset;
+	cpuclk->lock = &ctx->lock;
+	cpuclk->flags = flags;
+	cpuclk->clk_nb.notifier_call = exynos_cpuclk_notifier_cb;
+
+	cpuclk->alt_parent = __clk_lookup(alt_parent);
+	if (!cpuclk->alt_parent) {
+		pr_err("%s: could not lookup alternate parent %s\n",
+				__func__, alt_parent);
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto free_cpuclk;
+	}
+
+	clk = __clk_lookup(parent);
+	if (!clk) {
+		pr_err("%s: could not lookup parent clock %s\n",
+				__func__, parent);
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto free_cpuclk;
+	}
+
+	ret = clk_notifier_register(clk, &cpuclk->clk_nb);
+	if (ret) {
+		pr_err("%s: failed to register clock notifier for %s\n",
+				__func__, name);
+		goto free_cpuclk;
+	}
+
+	cpuclk->cfg = kmemdup(cfg, sizeof(*cfg) * num_cfgs, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!cpuclk->cfg) {
+		pr_err("%s: could not allocate memory for cpuclk data\n",
+				__func__);
+		kfree(cpuclk);
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		goto unregister_clk_nb;
+	}
+
+	clk = clk_register(NULL, &cpuclk->hw);
+	if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
+		pr_err("%s: could not register cpuclk %s\n", __func__,	name);
+		ret = PTR_ERR(clk);
+		goto free_cpuclk_data;
+	}
+
+	samsung_clk_add_lookup(ctx, clk, lookup_id);
+	return 0;
+
+free_cpuclk_data:
+	kfree(cpuclk->cfg);
+unregister_clk_nb:
+	clk_notifier_unregister(__clk_lookup(parent), &cpuclk->clk_nb);
+free_cpuclk:
+	kfree(cpuclk);
+	return ret;
+}
diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.h b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..42e1905
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.h
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2014 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * Common Clock Framework support for all PLL's in Samsung platforms
+*/
+
+#ifndef __SAMSUNG_CLK_CPU_H
+#define __SAMSUNG_CLK_CPU_H
+
+#include "clk.h"
+
+#define E4210_CPU_DIV0(apll, pclk_dbg, atb, periph, corem1, corem0)	\
+		(((apll) << 24) | ((pclk_dbg) << 20) | ((atb) << 16) |	\
+		((periph) << 12) | ((corem1) << 8) | ((corem0) <<  4))
+#define E4210_CPU_DIV1(hpm, copy)					\
+		(((hpm) << 4) | ((copy) << 0))
+
+#define E5250_CPU_DIV0(apll, pclk_dbg, atb, periph, acp, cpud)		\
+		((((apll) << 24) | ((pclk_dbg) << 20) | ((atb) << 16) |	\
+		 ((periph) << 12) | ((acp) << 8) | ((cpud) << 4)))
+#define E5250_CPU_DIV1(hpm, copy)					\
+		(((hpm) << 4) | (copy))
+
+#define E5420_EGL_DIV0(apll, pclk_dbg, atb, cpud)			\
+		((((apll) << 24) | ((pclk_dbg) << 20) | ((atb) << 16) |	\
+		 ((cpud) << 4)))
+#define E5420_KFC_DIV(kpll, pclk, aclk)					\
+		((((kpll) << 24) | ((pclk) << 20) | ((aclk) << 4)))
+
+/**
+ * struct exynos_cpuclk_data: config data to setup cpu clocks.
+ * @prate: frequency of the primary parent clock (in KHz).
+ * @div0: value to be programmed in the div_cpu0 register.
+ * @div1: value to be programmed in the div_cpu1 register.
+ *
+ * This structure holds the divider configuration data for dividers in the CPU
+ * clock domain. The parent frequency at which these divider values are valid is
+ * specified in @prate. The @prate is the frequency of the primary parent clock.
+ * For CPU clock domains that do not have a DIV1 register, the @div1 member
+ * value is not used.
+ */
+struct exynos_cpuclk_cfg_data {
+	unsigned long	prate;
+	unsigned long	div0;
+	unsigned long	div1;
+};
+
+/**
+ * struct exynos_cpuclk: information about clock supplied to a CPU core.
+ * @hw:	handle between CCF and CPU clock.
+ * @alt_parent: alternate parent clock to use when switching the speed
+ *	of the primary parent clock.
+ * @ctrl_base:	base address of the clock controller.
+ * @lock: cpu clock domain register access lock.
+ * @cfg: cpu clock rate configuration data.
+ * @num_cfgs: number of array elements in @cfg array.
+ * @clk_nb: clock notifier registered for changes in clock speed of the
+ *	primary parent clock.
+ * @flags: configuration flags for the CPU clock.
+ *
+ * This structure holds information required for programming the CPU clock for
+ * various clock speeds.
+ */
+struct exynos_cpuclk {
+	struct clk_hw				hw;
+	struct clk				*alt_parent;
+	void __iomem				*ctrl_base;
+	spinlock_t				*lock;
+	const struct exynos_cpuclk_cfg_data	*cfg;
+	const unsigned long			num_cfgs;
+	struct notifier_block			clk_nb;
+	unsigned long				flags;
+
+/* The CPU clock registers has DIV1 configuration register */
+#define CLK_CPU_HAS_DIV1		(1 << 0)
+/* When ALT parent is active, debug clocks need safe divider values */
+#define CLK_CPU_NEEDS_DEBUG_ALT_DIV	(1 << 1)
+};
+
+extern int __init exynos_register_cpu_clock(struct samsung_clk_provider *ctx,
+			unsigned int lookup_id, const char *name,
+			const char *parent, const char *alt_parent,
+			unsigned long offset,
+			const struct exynos_cpuclk_cfg_data *cfg,
+			unsigned long num_cfgs, unsigned long flags);
+
+#endif /* __SAMSUNG_CLK_CPU_H */
-- 
1.6.6.rc2

[PATCH v11 2/6] clk: samsung: add cpu clock configuration data and instantiate cpu clock

[Thomas Abraham]

With the addition of the new Samsung specific cpu-clock type, the
arm clock can be represented as a cpu-clock type. Add the CPU clock
configuration data and instantiate the CPU clock type for Exynos4210,
Exynos5250 and Exynos5420.

Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Tested-by: Chander Kashyap <k.chander@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c      |   15 ++++++++++
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c   |   25 +++++++++++++++++
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c   |   45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5250.h |    1 +
 include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5420.h |    2 +
 5 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c
index 940f028..9af5767 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 #include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
 
 #include "clk.h"
+#include "clk-cpu.h"
 
 /* Exynos4 clock controller register offsets */
 #define SRC_LEFTBUS		0x4200
@@ -1354,6 +1355,16 @@ static struct samsung_pll_clock exynos4x12_plls[nr_plls] __initdata = {
 			VPLL_LOCK, VPLL_CON0, NULL),
 };
 
+static const struct exynos_cpuclk_cfg_data e4210_armclk_d[] __initconst = {
+	{ 1200000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(7, 1, 4, 3, 7, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(0, 5), },
+	{ 1000000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(7, 1, 4, 3, 7, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(0, 4), },
+	{  800000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(7, 1, 3, 3, 7, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(0, 3), },
+	{  500000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(7, 1, 3, 3, 7, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(0, 3), },
+	{  400000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(7, 1, 3, 3, 7, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(0, 3), },
+	{  200000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(0, 1, 1, 1, 3, 1), E4210_CPU_DIV1(0, 3), },
+	{  0 },
+};
+
 static void __init exynos4_core_down_clock(enum exynos4_soc soc)
 {
 	unsigned int tmp;
@@ -1457,6 +1468,10 @@ static void __init exynos4_clk_init(struct device_node *np,
 		samsung_clk_register_fixed_factor(ctx,
 			exynos4210_fixed_factor_clks,
 			ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4210_fixed_factor_clks));
+		exynos_register_cpu_clock(ctx, CLK_ARM_CLK, "armclk",
+			mout_core_p4210[0], mout_core_p4210[1], 0x14200,
+			e4210_armclk_d, ARRAY_SIZE(e4210_armclk_d),
+			CLK_CPU_NEEDS_DEBUG_ALT_DIV | CLK_CPU_HAS_DIV1);
 	} else {
 		samsung_clk_register_mux(ctx, exynos4x12_mux_clks,
 			ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4x12_mux_clks));
diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c
index 70ec3d2..e19e365 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 #include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
 
 #include "clk.h"
+#include "clk-cpu.h"
 
 #define APLL_LOCK		0x0
 #define APLL_CON0		0x100
@@ -748,6 +749,26 @@ static struct samsung_pll_clock exynos5250_plls[nr_plls] __initdata = {
 		VPLL_LOCK, VPLL_CON0, NULL),
 };
 
+static const struct exynos_cpuclk_cfg_data exynos5250_armclk_d[] __initconst = {
+	{ 1700000, E5250_CPU_DIV0(5, 3, 7, 7, 7, 3), E5250_CPU_DIV1(2, 0), },
+	{ 1600000, E5250_CPU_DIV0(4, 1, 7, 7, 7, 3), E5250_CPU_DIV1(2, 0), },
+	{ 1500000, E5250_CPU_DIV0(4, 1, 7, 7, 7, 2), E5250_CPU_DIV1(2, 0), },
+	{ 1400000, E5250_CPU_DIV0(4, 1, 6, 7, 7, 2), E5250_CPU_DIV1(2, 0), },
+	{ 1300000, E5250_CPU_DIV0(3, 1, 6, 7, 7, 2), E5250_CPU_DIV1(2, 0), },
+	{ 1200000, E5250_CPU_DIV0(3, 1, 5, 7, 7, 2), E5250_CPU_DIV1(2, 0), },
+	{ 1100000, E5250_CPU_DIV0(3, 1, 5, 7, 7, 3), E5250_CPU_DIV1(2, 0), },
+	{ 1000000, E5250_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 4, 7, 7, 1), E5250_CPU_DIV1(2, 0), },
+	{  900000, E5250_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 4, 7, 7, 1), E5250_CPU_DIV1(2, 0), },
+	{  800000, E5250_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 4, 7, 7, 1), E5250_CPU_DIV1(2, 0), },
+	{  700000, E5250_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 7, 7, 1), E5250_CPU_DIV1(2, 0), },
+	{  600000, E5250_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 7, 7, 1), E5250_CPU_DIV1(2, 0), },
+	{  500000, E5250_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 2, 7, 7, 1), E5250_CPU_DIV1(2, 0), },
+	{  400000, E5250_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 2, 7, 7, 1), E5250_CPU_DIV1(2, 0), },
+	{  300000, E5250_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 1, 7, 7, 1), E5250_CPU_DIV1(2, 0), },
+	{  200000, E5250_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 1, 7, 7, 1), E5250_CPU_DIV1(2, 0), },
+	{  0 },
+};
+
 static const struct of_device_id ext_clk_match[] __initconst = {
 	{ .compatible = "samsung,clock-xxti", .data = (void *)0, },
 	{ },
@@ -797,6 +818,10 @@ static void __init exynos5250_clk_init(struct device_node *np)
 			ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5250_div_clks));
 	samsung_clk_register_gate(ctx, exynos5250_gate_clks,
 			ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5250_gate_clks));
+	exynos_register_cpu_clock(ctx, CLK_ARM_CLK, "armclk",
+			mout_cpu_p[0], mout_cpu_p[1], 0x200,
+			exynos5250_armclk_d, ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5250_armclk_d),
+			CLK_CPU_HAS_DIV1);
 
 	/*
 	 * Enable arm clock down (in idle) and set arm divider
diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
index 848d602..d7ef36a 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 #include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
 
 #include "clk.h"
+#include "clk-cpu.h"
 
 #define APLL_LOCK		0x0
 #define APLL_CON0		0x100
@@ -1245,6 +1246,43 @@ static struct samsung_pll_clock exynos5x_plls[nr_plls] __initdata = {
 		KPLL_CON0, NULL),
 };
 
+static const struct exynos_cpuclk_cfg_data exynos5420_eglclk_d[] __initconst = {
+	{ 1800000, E5420_EGL_DIV0(3, 7, 7, 4), },
+	{ 1700000, E5420_EGL_DIV0(3, 7, 7, 3), },
+	{ 1600000, E5420_EGL_DIV0(3, 7, 7, 3), },
+	{ 1500000, E5420_EGL_DIV0(3, 7, 7, 3), },
+	{ 1400000, E5420_EGL_DIV0(3, 7, 7, 3), },
+	{ 1300000, E5420_EGL_DIV0(3, 7, 7, 2), },
+	{ 1200000, E5420_EGL_DIV0(3, 7, 7, 2), },
+	{ 1100000, E5420_EGL_DIV0(3, 7, 7, 2), },
+	{ 1000000, E5420_EGL_DIV0(3, 6, 6, 2), },
+	{  900000, E5420_EGL_DIV0(3, 6, 6, 2), },
+	{  800000, E5420_EGL_DIV0(3, 5, 5, 2), },
+	{  700000, E5420_EGL_DIV0(3, 5, 5, 2), },
+	{  600000, E5420_EGL_DIV0(3, 4, 4, 2), },
+	{  500000, E5420_EGL_DIV0(3, 3, 3, 2), },
+	{  400000, E5420_EGL_DIV0(3, 3, 3, 2), },
+	{  300000, E5420_EGL_DIV0(3, 3, 3, 2), },
+	{  200000, E5420_EGL_DIV0(3, 3, 3, 2), },
+	{  0 },
+};
+
+static const struct exynos_cpuclk_cfg_data exynos5420_kfcclk_d[] __initconst = {
+	{ 1300000, E5420_KFC_DIV(3, 5, 2), },
+	{ 1200000, E5420_KFC_DIV(3, 5, 2), },
+	{ 1100000, E5420_KFC_DIV(3, 5, 2), },
+	{ 1000000, E5420_KFC_DIV(3, 5, 2), },
+	{  900000, E5420_KFC_DIV(3, 5, 2), },
+	{  800000, E5420_KFC_DIV(3, 5, 2), },
+	{  700000, E5420_KFC_DIV(3, 4, 2), },
+	{  600000, E5420_KFC_DIV(3, 4, 2), },
+	{  500000, E5420_KFC_DIV(3, 4, 2), },
+	{  400000, E5420_KFC_DIV(3, 3, 2), },
+	{  300000, E5420_KFC_DIV(3, 3, 2), },
+	{  200000, E5420_KFC_DIV(3, 3, 2), },
+	{  0 },
+};
+
 static const struct of_device_id ext_clk_match[] __initconst = {
 	{ .compatible = "samsung,exynos5420-oscclk", .data = (void *)0, },
 	{ },
@@ -1309,6 +1347,13 @@ static void __init exynos5x_clk_init(struct device_node *np,
 				ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5800_gate_clks));
 	}
 
+	exynos_register_cpu_clock(ctx, CLK_ARM_CLK, "armclk",
+		mout_cpu_p[0], mout_cpu_p[1], 0x200,
+		exynos5420_eglclk_d, ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5420_eglclk_d), 0);
+	exynos_register_cpu_clock(ctx, CLK_KFC_CLK, "kfcclk",
+		mout_kfc_p[0], mout_kfc_p[1], 0x28200,
+		exynos5420_kfcclk_d, ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5420_kfcclk_d), 0);
+
 	exynos5420_clk_sleep_init();
 
 	samsung_clk_of_add_provider(np, ctx);
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5250.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5250.h
index 4273891..8183d1c 100644
--- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5250.h
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5250.h
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
 #define CLK_FOUT_CPLL		6
 #define CLK_FOUT_EPLL		7
 #define CLK_FOUT_VPLL		8
+#define CLK_ARM_CLK		9
 
 /* gate for special clocks (sclk) */
 #define CLK_SCLK_CAM_BAYER	128
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5420.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5420.h
index 8dc0913..ec0af64 100644
--- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5420.h
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5420.h
@@ -25,6 +25,8 @@
 #define CLK_FOUT_MPLL		10
 #define CLK_FOUT_BPLL		11
 #define CLK_FOUT_KPLL		12
+#define CLK_ARM_CLK		13
+#define CLK_KFC_CLK		14
 
 /* gate for special clocks (sclk) */
 #define CLK_SCLK_UART0		128
-- 
1.6.6.rc2

[PATCH v11 3/6] ARM: dts: Exynos: add CPU OPP and regulator supply property

[Thomas Abraham]

For Exynos 4210/5250/5420 based platforms, add CPU operating points and CPU
regulator supply properties for migrating from Exynos specific cpufreq driver
to using generic cpufreq drivers.

Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Cc: Andreas Faerber <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Farber <afaerber@suse.de>
Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Tested-by: Chander Kashyap <k.chander@samsung.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-origen.dts         |    4 ++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-trats.dts          |    4 ++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts |    4 ++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi               |   14 ++++++++-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts        |    4 ++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts       |    4 ++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts           |    4 ++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi               |   25 ++++++++++++++-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi               |   38 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 9 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-origen.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-origen.dts
index f767c42..887dded 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-origen.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-origen.dts
@@ -334,3 +334,7 @@
 		};
 	};
 };
+
+&cpu0 {
+	cpu0-supply = <&buck1_reg>;
+};
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-trats.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-trats.dts
index f516da9..66119dd 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-trats.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-trats.dts
@@ -446,3 +446,7 @@
 		};
 	};
 };
+
+&cpu0 {
+	cpu0-supply = <&varm_breg>;
+};
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts
index d50eb3a..bf0a39c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts
@@ -492,3 +492,7 @@
 &mdma1 {
 	reg = <0x12840000 0x1000>;
 };
+
+&cpu0 {
+	cpu0-supply = <&vdd_arm_reg>;
+};
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi
index bcc9e63..69bac07 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi
@@ -35,10 +35,22 @@
 		#address-cells = <1>;
 		#size-cells = <0>;
 
-		cpu@900 {
+		cpu0: cpu@900 {
 			device_type = "cpu";
 			compatible = "arm,cortex-a9";
 			reg = <0x900>;
+			clocks = <&clock CLK_ARM_CLK>;
+			clock-names = "cpu";
+			clock-latency = <160000>;
+
+			operating-points = <
+				1200000 1250000
+				1000000 1150000
+				800000	1075000
+				500000	975000
+				400000	975000
+				200000	950000
+			>;
 		};
 
 		cpu@901 {
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
index 7e728a1..ac07cdf 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
@@ -548,6 +548,10 @@
 	cap-sd-highspeed;
 };
 
+&cpu0 {
+	cpu0-supply = <&buck2_reg>;
+};
+
 &rtc {
 	status = "okay";
 };
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts
index bc27cc2..d91db82 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts
@@ -410,3 +410,7 @@
 		};
 	};
 };
+
+&cpu0 {
+	cpu0-supply = <&buck2_reg>;
+};
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts
index f9bc04b..8459fb6 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts
@@ -599,6 +599,10 @@
 	};
 };
 
+&cpu0 {
+	cpu0-supply = <&buck2_reg>;
+};
+
 &rtc {
 	status = "okay";
 	clocks = <&clock CLK_RTC>, <&max77686 MAX77686_CLK_AP>;
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
index 012b021..bccdd22 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
@@ -58,11 +58,34 @@
 		#address-cells = <1>;
 		#size-cells = <0>;
 
-		cpu@0 {
+		cpu0: cpu@0 {
 			device_type = "cpu";
 			compatible = "arm,cortex-a15";
 			reg = <0>;
 			clock-frequency = <1700000000>;
+
+			clocks = <&clock CLK_ARM_CLK>;
+			clock-names = "cpu";
+			clock-latency = <140000>;
+
+			operating-points = <
+				1700000 1300000
+				1600000 1250000
+				1500000 1225000
+				1400000 1200000
+				1300000 1150000
+				1200000 1125000
+				1100000 1100000
+				1000000 1075000
+				 900000 1050000
+				 800000 1025000
+				 700000 1012500
+				 600000 1000000
+				 500000  975000
+				 400000  950000
+				 300000  937500
+				 200000  925000
+			>;
 		};
 		cpu@1 {
 			device_type = "cpu";
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
index 8617a03..1df164e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
@@ -59,8 +59,26 @@
 			device_type = "cpu";
 			compatible = "arm,cortex-a15";
 			reg = <0x0>;
+			clocks = <&clock CLK_ARM_CLK>;
+			clock-names = "cpu-cluster.0";
 			clock-frequency = <1800000000>;
 			cci-control-port = <&cci_control1>;
+			clock-latency = <140000>;
+
+			operating-points = <
+				1800000 1250000
+				1700000 1212500
+				1600000 1175000
+				1500000 1137500
+				1400000 1112500
+				1300000 1062500
+				1200000 1037500
+				1100000 1012500
+				1000000 987500
+				 900000 962500
+				 800000 937500
+				 700000 912500
+			>;
 		};
 
 		cpu1: cpu@1 {
@@ -69,6 +87,7 @@
 			reg = <0x1>;
 			clock-frequency = <1800000000>;
 			cci-control-port = <&cci_control1>;
+			clock-latency = <140000>;
 		};
 
 		cpu2: cpu@2 {
@@ -77,6 +96,7 @@
 			reg = <0x2>;
 			clock-frequency = <1800000000>;
 			cci-control-port = <&cci_control1>;
+			clock-latency = <140000>;
 		};
 
 		cpu3: cpu@3 {
@@ -85,14 +105,29 @@
 			reg = <0x3>;
 			clock-frequency = <1800000000>;
 			cci-control-port = <&cci_control1>;
+			clock-latency = <140000>;
 		};
 
 		cpu4: cpu@100 {
 			device_type = "cpu";
 			compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
 			reg = <0x100>;
+			clocks = <&clock CLK_KFC_CLK>;
+			clock-names = "cpu-cluster.1";
 			clock-frequency = <1000000000>;
 			cci-control-port = <&cci_control0>;
+			clock-latency = <140000>;
+
+			operating-points = <
+				1300000 1275000
+				1200000 1212500
+				1100000 1162500
+				1000000 1112500
+				 900000 1062500
+				 800000 1025000
+				 700000 975000
+				 600000 937500
+			>;
 		};
 
 		cpu5: cpu@101 {
@@ -101,6 +136,7 @@
 			reg = <0x101>;
 			clock-frequency = <1000000000>;
 			cci-control-port = <&cci_control0>;
+			clock-latency = <140000>;
 		};
 
 		cpu6: cpu@102 {
@@ -109,6 +145,7 @@
 			reg = <0x102>;
 			clock-frequency = <1000000000>;
 			cci-control-port = <&cci_control0>;
+			clock-latency = <140000>;
 		};
 
 		cpu7: cpu@103 {
@@ -117,6 +154,7 @@
 			reg = <0x103>;
 			clock-frequency = <1000000000>;
 			cci-control-port = <&cci_control0>;
+			clock-latency = <140000>;
 		};
 	};
 
-- 
1.6.6.rc2

[PATCH v11 4/6] ARM: Exynos: switch to using generic cpufreq driver for Exynos4210/5250/5420

[Thomas Abraham]

The new CPU clock type allows the use of generic CPUfreq drivers. So for
Exynos4210/5250, switch to using generic cpufreq driver. For Exynos5420,
which did not have CPUfreq driver support, enable the use of generic
CPUfreq driver.

Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Tested-by: Chander Kashyap <k.chander@samsung.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c |   24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
index 6b283eb..a1be294 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
@@ -282,6 +282,28 @@ static void __init exynos_init_irq(void)
 	exynos_map_pmu();
 }
 
+static const struct of_device_id exynos_cpufreq_matches[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "samsung,exynos5420", .data = "arm-bL-cpufreq-dt" },
+	{ .compatible = "samsung,exynos5250", .data = "cpufreq-dt" },
+	{ .compatible = "samsung,exynos4210", .data = "cpufreq-dt" },
+	{ .compatible = "samsung,exynos5440", .data = "exynos5440-cpufreq" },
+	{ /* sentinel */ }
+};
+
+static void __init exynos_cpufreq_init(void)
+{
+	struct device_node *root = of_find_node_by_path("/");
+	const struct of_device_id *match;
+
+	match = of_match_node(exynos_cpufreq_matches, root);
+	if (!match) {
+		platform_device_register_simple("exynos-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	platform_device_register_simple(match->data, -1, NULL, 0);
+}
+
 static void __init exynos_dt_machine_init(void)
 {
 	struct device_node *i2c_np;
@@ -321,7 +343,7 @@ static void __init exynos_dt_machine_init(void)
 			of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5250"))
 		platform_device_register(&exynos_cpuidle);
 
-	platform_device_register_simple("exynos-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
+	exynos_cpufreq_init();
 
 	of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table, NULL, NULL);
 }
-- 
1.6.6.rc2

[PATCH v11 5/6] cpufreq: exynos: remove exynos4210/5250 specific cpufreq driver support

[Thomas Abraham]

Exynos4210 and Exynos5250 based platforms have switched over to use generic
cpufreq drivers for cpufreq functionality. So the Exynos specific cpufreq
drivers for these platforms can be removed.

Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Tested-by: Chander Kashyap <k.chander@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm |   22 ----------------------
 drivers/cpufreq/Makefile    |    2 --
 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
index 83a75dc..701f5ca 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
@@ -28,17 +28,6 @@ config ARM_VEXPRESS_SPC_CPUFREQ
 config ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ
 	bool
 
-config ARM_EXYNOS4210_CPUFREQ
-	bool "SAMSUNG EXYNOS4210"
-	depends on CPU_EXYNOS4210
-	default y
-	select ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ
-	help
-	  This adds the CPUFreq driver for Samsung EXYNOS4210
-	  SoC (S5PV310 or S5PC210).
-
-	  If in doubt, say N.
-
 config ARM_EXYNOS4X12_CPUFREQ
 	bool "SAMSUNG EXYNOS4x12"
 	depends on SOC_EXYNOS4212 || SOC_EXYNOS4412
@@ -50,17 +39,6 @@ config ARM_EXYNOS4X12_CPUFREQ
 
 	  If in doubt, say N.
 
-config ARM_EXYNOS5250_CPUFREQ
-	bool "SAMSUNG EXYNOS5250"
-	depends on SOC_EXYNOS5250
-	default y
-	select ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ
-	help
-	  This adds the CPUFreq driver for Samsung EXYNOS5250
-	  SoC.
-
-	  If in doubt, say N.
-
 config ARM_EXYNOS5440_CPUFREQ
 	bool "SAMSUNG EXYNOS5440"
 	depends on SOC_EXYNOS5440
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
index 40c53dc..74e55f9 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
@@ -52,9 +52,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_DT_BL_CPUFREQ)		+= arm_big_little_dt.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI)		+= davinci-cpufreq.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_UX500_SOC_DB8500)		+= dbx500-cpufreq.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ)	+= exynos-cpufreq.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS4210_CPUFREQ)	+= exynos4210-cpufreq.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS4X12_CPUFREQ)	+= exynos4x12-cpufreq.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS5250_CPUFREQ)	+= exynos5250-cpufreq.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS5440_CPUFREQ)	+= exynos5440-cpufreq.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_HIGHBANK_CPUFREQ)	+= highbank-cpufreq.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_IMX6Q_CPUFREQ)		+= imx6q-cpufreq.o
-- 
1.6.6.rc2

Re: [PATCH v11 5/6] cpufreq: exynos: remove exynos4210/5250 specific cpufreq driver support

[Viresh Kumar]

On 20 October 2014 17:11, Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com> wrote:
> Exynos4210 and Exynos5250 based platforms have switched over to use generic
> cpufreq drivers for cpufreq functionality. So the Exynos specific cpufreq
> drivers for these platforms can be removed.
>
> Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
> Tested-by: Chander Kashyap <k.chander@samsung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm |   22 ----------------------
>  drivers/cpufreq/Makefile    |    2 --
>  2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

Looks like you forgot removing drivers ;)

Re: [PATCH v11 5/6] cpufreq: exynos: remove exynos4210/5250 specific cpufreq driver support

[Thomas Abraham]

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 20 October 2014 17:11, Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com> wrote:
>> Exynos4210 and Exynos5250 based platforms have switched over to use generic
>> cpufreq drivers for cpufreq functionality. So the Exynos specific cpufreq
>> drivers for these platforms can be removed.
>>
>> Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
>> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>> Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
>> Tested-by: Chander Kashyap <k.chander@samsung.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm |   22 ----------------------
>>  drivers/cpufreq/Makefile    |    2 --
>>  2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> Looks like you forgot removing drivers ;)

Sorry, missed it while doing the rebase. I will fix and send an updated patch.

Thanks,
Thomas.

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH v11 5/6] cpufreq: exynos: remove exynos4210/5250 specific cpufreq driver support

[Thomas Abraham]

Exynos4210 and Exynos5250 based platforms have switched over to use generic
cpufreq drivers for cpufreq functionality. So the Exynos specific cpufreq
drivers for these platforms can be removed.

Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Tested-by: Chander Kashyap <k.chander@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm          |   22 ----
 drivers/cpufreq/Makefile             |    2 -
 drivers/cpufreq/exynos4210-cpufreq.c |  184 -----------------------------
 drivers/cpufreq/exynos5250-cpufreq.c |  210 ----------------------------------
 4 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 418 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 drivers/cpufreq/exynos4210-cpufreq.c
 delete mode 100644 drivers/cpufreq/exynos5250-cpufreq.c

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
index 83a75dc..701f5ca 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
@@ -28,17 +28,6 @@ config ARM_VEXPRESS_SPC_CPUFREQ
 config ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ
 	bool
 
-config ARM_EXYNOS4210_CPUFREQ
-	bool "SAMSUNG EXYNOS4210"
-	depends on CPU_EXYNOS4210
-	default y
-	select ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ
-	help
-	  This adds the CPUFreq driver for Samsung EXYNOS4210
-	  SoC (S5PV310 or S5PC210).
-
-	  If in doubt, say N.
-
 config ARM_EXYNOS4X12_CPUFREQ
 	bool "SAMSUNG EXYNOS4x12"
 	depends on SOC_EXYNOS4212 || SOC_EXYNOS4412
@@ -50,17 +39,6 @@ config ARM_EXYNOS4X12_CPUFREQ
 
 	  If in doubt, say N.
 
-config ARM_EXYNOS5250_CPUFREQ
-	bool "SAMSUNG EXYNOS5250"
-	depends on SOC_EXYNOS5250
-	default y
-	select ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ
-	help
-	  This adds the CPUFreq driver for Samsung EXYNOS5250
-	  SoC.
-
-	  If in doubt, say N.
-
 config ARM_EXYNOS5440_CPUFREQ
 	bool "SAMSUNG EXYNOS5440"
 	depends on SOC_EXYNOS5440
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
index 40c53dc..74e55f9 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
@@ -52,9 +52,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_DT_BL_CPUFREQ)		+= arm_big_little_dt.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI)		+= davinci-cpufreq.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_UX500_SOC_DB8500)		+= dbx500-cpufreq.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ)	+= exynos-cpufreq.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS4210_CPUFREQ)	+= exynos4210-cpufreq.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS4X12_CPUFREQ)	+= exynos4x12-cpufreq.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS5250_CPUFREQ)	+= exynos5250-cpufreq.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS5440_CPUFREQ)	+= exynos5440-cpufreq.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_HIGHBANK_CPUFREQ)	+= highbank-cpufreq.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_IMX6Q_CPUFREQ)		+= imx6q-cpufreq.o
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos4210-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos4210-cpufreq.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 843ec82..0000000
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos4210-cpufreq.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,184 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * Copyright (c) 2010-2011 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
- *		http://www.samsung.com
- *
- * EXYNOS4210 - CPU frequency scaling support
- *
- * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
- * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
- * published by the Free Software Foundation.
-*/
-
-#include <linux/module.h>
-#include <linux/kernel.h>
-#include <linux/err.h>
-#include <linux/clk.h>
-#include <linux/io.h>
-#include <linux/slab.h>
-#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
-#include <linux/of.h>
-#include <linux/of_address.h>
-
-#include "exynos-cpufreq.h"
-
-static struct clk *cpu_clk;
-static struct clk *moutcore;
-static struct clk *mout_mpll;
-static struct clk *mout_apll;
-static struct exynos_dvfs_info *cpufreq;
-
-static unsigned int exynos4210_volt_table[] = {
-	1250000, 1150000, 1050000, 975000, 950000,
-};
-
-static struct cpufreq_frequency_table exynos4210_freq_table[] = {
-	{0, L0, 1200 * 1000},
-	{0, L1, 1000 * 1000},
-	{0, L2,  800 * 1000},
-	{0, L3,  500 * 1000},
-	{0, L4,  200 * 1000},
-	{0, 0, CPUFREQ_TABLE_END},
-};
-
-static struct apll_freq apll_freq_4210[] = {
-	/*
-	 * values:
-	 * freq
-	 * clock divider for CORE, COREM0, COREM1, PERIPH, ATB, PCLK_DBG, APLL, RESERVED
-	 * clock divider for COPY, HPM, RESERVED
-	 * PLL M, P, S
-	 */
-	APLL_FREQ(1200, 0, 3, 7, 3, 4, 1, 7, 0, 5, 0, 0, 150, 3, 1),
-	APLL_FREQ(1000, 0, 3, 7, 3, 4, 1, 7, 0, 4, 0, 0, 250, 6, 1),
-	APLL_FREQ(800,  0, 3, 7, 3, 3, 1, 7, 0, 3, 0, 0, 200, 6, 1),
-	APLL_FREQ(500,  0, 3, 7, 3, 3, 1, 7, 0, 3, 0, 0, 250, 6, 2),
-	APLL_FREQ(200,  0, 1, 3, 1, 3, 1, 0, 0, 3, 0, 0, 200, 6, 3),
-};
-
-static void exynos4210_set_clkdiv(unsigned int div_index)
-{
-	unsigned int tmp;
-
-	/* Change Divider - CPU0 */
-
-	tmp = apll_freq_4210[div_index].clk_div_cpu0;
-
-	__raw_writel(tmp, cpufreq->cmu_regs + EXYNOS4_CLKDIV_CPU);
-
-	do {
-		tmp = __raw_readl(cpufreq->cmu_regs + EXYNOS4_CLKDIV_STATCPU);
-	} while (tmp & 0x1111111);
-
-	/* Change Divider - CPU1 */
-
-	tmp = apll_freq_4210[div_index].clk_div_cpu1;
-
-	__raw_writel(tmp, cpufreq->cmu_regs + EXYNOS4_CLKDIV_CPU1);
-
-	do {
-		tmp = __raw_readl(cpufreq->cmu_regs + EXYNOS4_CLKDIV_STATCPU1);
-	} while (tmp & 0x11);
-}
-
-static void exynos4210_set_apll(unsigned int index)
-{
-	unsigned int tmp, freq = apll_freq_4210[index].freq;
-
-	/* MUX_CORE_SEL = MPLL, ARMCLK uses MPLL for lock time */
-	clk_set_parent(moutcore, mout_mpll);
-
-	do {
-		tmp = (__raw_readl(cpufreq->cmu_regs + EXYNOS4_CLKMUX_STATCPU)
-			>> EXYNOS4_CLKSRC_CPU_MUXCORE_SHIFT);
-		tmp &= 0x7;
-	} while (tmp != 0x2);
-
-	clk_set_rate(mout_apll, freq * 1000);
-
-	/* MUX_CORE_SEL = APLL */
-	clk_set_parent(moutcore, mout_apll);
-
-	do {
-		tmp = __raw_readl(cpufreq->cmu_regs + EXYNOS4_CLKMUX_STATCPU);
-		tmp &= EXYNOS4_CLKMUX_STATCPU_MUXCORE_MASK;
-	} while (tmp != (0x1 << EXYNOS4_CLKSRC_CPU_MUXCORE_SHIFT));
-}
-
-static void exynos4210_set_frequency(unsigned int old_index,
-				     unsigned int new_index)
-{
-	if (old_index > new_index) {
-		exynos4210_set_clkdiv(new_index);
-		exynos4210_set_apll(new_index);
-	} else if (old_index < new_index) {
-		exynos4210_set_apll(new_index);
-		exynos4210_set_clkdiv(new_index);
-	}
-}
-
-int exynos4210_cpufreq_init(struct exynos_dvfs_info *info)
-{
-	struct device_node *np;
-	unsigned long rate;
-
-	/*
-	 * HACK: This is a temporary workaround to get access to clock
-	 * controller registers directly and remove static mappings and
-	 * dependencies on platform headers. It is necessary to enable
-	 * Exynos multi-platform support and will be removed together with
-	 * this whole driver as soon as Exynos gets migrated to use
-	 * cpufreq-dt driver.
-	 */
-	np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "samsung,exynos4210-clock");
-	if (!np) {
-		pr_err("%s: failed to find clock controller DT node\n",
-			__func__);
-		return -ENODEV;
-	}
-
-	info->cmu_regs = of_iomap(np, 0);
-	if (!info->cmu_regs) {
-		pr_err("%s: failed to map CMU registers\n", __func__);
-		return -EFAULT;
-	}
-
-	cpu_clk = clk_get(NULL, "armclk");
-	if (IS_ERR(cpu_clk))
-		return PTR_ERR(cpu_clk);
-
-	moutcore = clk_get(NULL, "moutcore");
-	if (IS_ERR(moutcore))
-		goto err_moutcore;
-
-	mout_mpll = clk_get(NULL, "mout_mpll");
-	if (IS_ERR(mout_mpll))
-		goto err_mout_mpll;
-
-	rate = clk_get_rate(mout_mpll) / 1000;
-
-	mout_apll = clk_get(NULL, "mout_apll");
-	if (IS_ERR(mout_apll))
-		goto err_mout_apll;
-
-	info->mpll_freq_khz = rate;
-	/* 800Mhz */
-	info->pll_safe_idx = L2;
-	info->cpu_clk = cpu_clk;
-	info->volt_table = exynos4210_volt_table;
-	info->freq_table = exynos4210_freq_table;
-	info->set_freq = exynos4210_set_frequency;
-
-	cpufreq = info;
-
-	return 0;
-
-err_mout_apll:
-	clk_put(mout_mpll);
-err_mout_mpll:
-	clk_put(moutcore);
-err_moutcore:
-	clk_put(cpu_clk);
-
-	pr_debug("%s: failed initialization\n", __func__);
-	return -EINVAL;
-}
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5250-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5250-cpufreq.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 3eafdc7..0000000
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5250-cpufreq.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,210 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * Copyright (c) 2010-20122Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
- *		http://www.samsung.com
- *
- * EXYNOS5250 - CPU frequency scaling support
- *
- * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
- * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
- * published by the Free Software Foundation.
-*/
-
-#include <linux/module.h>
-#include <linux/kernel.h>
-#include <linux/err.h>
-#include <linux/clk.h>
-#include <linux/io.h>
-#include <linux/slab.h>
-#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
-#include <linux/of.h>
-#include <linux/of_address.h>
-
-#include "exynos-cpufreq.h"
-
-static struct clk *cpu_clk;
-static struct clk *moutcore;
-static struct clk *mout_mpll;
-static struct clk *mout_apll;
-static struct exynos_dvfs_info *cpufreq;
-
-static unsigned int exynos5250_volt_table[] = {
-	1300000, 1250000, 1225000, 1200000, 1150000,
-	1125000, 1100000, 1075000, 1050000, 1025000,
-	1012500, 1000000,  975000,  950000,  937500,
-	925000
-};
-
-static struct cpufreq_frequency_table exynos5250_freq_table[] = {
-	{0, L0, 1700 * 1000},
-	{0, L1, 1600 * 1000},
-	{0, L2, 1500 * 1000},
-	{0, L3, 1400 * 1000},
-	{0, L4, 1300 * 1000},
-	{0, L5, 1200 * 1000},
-	{0, L6, 1100 * 1000},
-	{0, L7, 1000 * 1000},
-	{0, L8,  900 * 1000},
-	{0, L9,  800 * 1000},
-	{0, L10, 700 * 1000},
-	{0, L11, 600 * 1000},
-	{0, L12, 500 * 1000},
-	{0, L13, 400 * 1000},
-	{0, L14, 300 * 1000},
-	{0, L15, 200 * 1000},
-	{0, 0, CPUFREQ_TABLE_END},
-};
-
-static struct apll_freq apll_freq_5250[] = {
-	/*
-	 * values:
-	 * freq
-	 * clock divider for ARM, CPUD, ACP, PERIPH, ATB, PCLK_DBG, APLL, ARM2
-	 * clock divider for COPY, HPM, RESERVED
-	 * PLL M, P, S
-	 */
-	APLL_FREQ(1700, 0, 3, 7, 7, 7, 3, 5, 0, 0, 2, 0, 425, 6, 0),
-	APLL_FREQ(1600, 0, 3, 7, 7, 7, 1, 4, 0, 0, 2, 0, 200, 3, 0),
-	APLL_FREQ(1500, 0, 2, 7, 7, 7, 1, 4, 0, 0, 2, 0, 250, 4, 0),
-	APLL_FREQ(1400, 0, 2, 7, 7, 6, 1, 4, 0, 0, 2, 0, 175, 3, 0),
-	APLL_FREQ(1300, 0, 2, 7, 7, 6, 1, 3, 0, 0, 2, 0, 325, 6, 0),
-	APLL_FREQ(1200, 0, 2, 7, 7, 5, 1, 3, 0, 0, 2, 0, 200, 4, 0),
-	APLL_FREQ(1100, 0, 3, 7, 7, 5, 1, 3, 0, 0, 2, 0, 275, 6, 0),
-	APLL_FREQ(1000, 0, 1, 7, 7, 4, 1, 2, 0, 0, 2, 0, 125, 3, 0),
-	APLL_FREQ(900,  0, 1, 7, 7, 4, 1, 2, 0, 0, 2, 0, 150, 4, 0),
-	APLL_FREQ(800,  0, 1, 7, 7, 4, 1, 2, 0, 0, 2, 0, 100, 3, 0),
-	APLL_FREQ(700,  0, 1, 7, 7, 3, 1, 1, 0, 0, 2, 0, 175, 3, 1),
-	APLL_FREQ(600,  0, 1, 7, 7, 3, 1, 1, 0, 0, 2, 0, 200, 4, 1),
-	APLL_FREQ(500,  0, 1, 7, 7, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 2, 0, 125, 3, 1),
-	APLL_FREQ(400,  0, 1, 7, 7, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 2, 0, 100, 3, 1),
-	APLL_FREQ(300,  0, 1, 7, 7, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 2, 0, 200, 4, 2),
-	APLL_FREQ(200,  0, 1, 7, 7, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 2, 0, 100, 3, 2),
-};
-
-static void set_clkdiv(unsigned int div_index)
-{
-	unsigned int tmp;
-
-	/* Change Divider - CPU0 */
-
-	tmp = apll_freq_5250[div_index].clk_div_cpu0;
-
-	__raw_writel(tmp, cpufreq->cmu_regs + EXYNOS5_CLKDIV_CPU0);
-
-	while (__raw_readl(cpufreq->cmu_regs + EXYNOS5_CLKDIV_STATCPU0)
-	       & 0x11111111)
-		cpu_relax();
-
-	/* Change Divider - CPU1 */
-	tmp = apll_freq_5250[div_index].clk_div_cpu1;
-
-	__raw_writel(tmp, cpufreq->cmu_regs + EXYNOS5_CLKDIV_CPU1);
-
-	while (__raw_readl(cpufreq->cmu_regs + EXYNOS5_CLKDIV_STATCPU1) & 0x11)
-		cpu_relax();
-}
-
-static void set_apll(unsigned int index)
-{
-	unsigned int tmp;
-	unsigned int freq = apll_freq_5250[index].freq;
-
-	/* MUX_CORE_SEL = MPLL, ARMCLK uses MPLL for lock time */
-	clk_set_parent(moutcore, mout_mpll);
-
-	do {
-		cpu_relax();
-		tmp = (__raw_readl(cpufreq->cmu_regs + EXYNOS5_CLKMUX_STATCPU)
-			>> 16);
-		tmp &= 0x7;
-	} while (tmp != 0x2);
-
-	clk_set_rate(mout_apll, freq * 1000);
-
-	/* MUX_CORE_SEL = APLL */
-	clk_set_parent(moutcore, mout_apll);
-
-	do {
-		cpu_relax();
-		tmp = __raw_readl(cpufreq->cmu_regs + EXYNOS5_CLKMUX_STATCPU);
-		tmp &= (0x7 << 16);
-	} while (tmp != (0x1 << 16));
-}
-
-static void exynos5250_set_frequency(unsigned int old_index,
-				  unsigned int new_index)
-{
-	if (old_index > new_index) {
-		set_clkdiv(new_index);
-		set_apll(new_index);
-	} else if (old_index < new_index) {
-		set_apll(new_index);
-		set_clkdiv(new_index);
-	}
-}
-
-int exynos5250_cpufreq_init(struct exynos_dvfs_info *info)
-{
-	struct device_node *np;
-	unsigned long rate;
-
-	/*
-	 * HACK: This is a temporary workaround to get access to clock
-	 * controller registers directly and remove static mappings and
-	 * dependencies on platform headers. It is necessary to enable
-	 * Exynos multi-platform support and will be removed together with
-	 * this whole driver as soon as Exynos gets migrated to use
-	 * cpufreq-dt driver.
-	 */
-	np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "samsung,exynos5250-clock");
-	if (!np) {
-		pr_err("%s: failed to find clock controller DT node\n",
-			__func__);
-		return -ENODEV;
-	}
-
-	info->cmu_regs = of_iomap(np, 0);
-	if (!info->cmu_regs) {
-		pr_err("%s: failed to map CMU registers\n", __func__);
-		return -EFAULT;
-	}
-
-	cpu_clk = clk_get(NULL, "armclk");
-	if (IS_ERR(cpu_clk))
-		return PTR_ERR(cpu_clk);
-
-	moutcore = clk_get(NULL, "mout_cpu");
-	if (IS_ERR(moutcore))
-		goto err_moutcore;
-
-	mout_mpll = clk_get(NULL, "mout_mpll");
-	if (IS_ERR(mout_mpll))
-		goto err_mout_mpll;
-
-	rate = clk_get_rate(mout_mpll) / 1000;
-
-	mout_apll = clk_get(NULL, "mout_apll");
-	if (IS_ERR(mout_apll))
-		goto err_mout_apll;
-
-	info->mpll_freq_khz = rate;
-	/* 800Mhz */
-	info->pll_safe_idx = L9;
-	info->cpu_clk = cpu_clk;
-	info->volt_table = exynos5250_volt_table;
-	info->freq_table = exynos5250_freq_table;
-	info->set_freq = exynos5250_set_frequency;
-
-	cpufreq = info;
-
-	return 0;
-
-err_mout_apll:
-	clk_put(mout_mpll);
-err_mout_mpll:
-	clk_put(moutcore);
-err_moutcore:
-	clk_put(cpu_clk);
-
-	pr_err("%s: failed initialization\n", __func__);
-	return -EINVAL;
-}
-- 
1.6.6.rc2

[PATCH v11 6/6] clk: samsung: remove unused clock aliases and update clock flags

[Thomas Abraham]

With some of the Exynos SoCs switched over to use the generic CPUfreq drivers,
the unused clock aliases can be removed. In addition to this, the individual
clock blocks which are now encapsulated with the consolidate CPU clock type
can now be marked with read-only flags.

Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Tested-by: Chander Kashyap <k.chander@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c    |   48 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c |   19 ++++++++-----
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c |   27 ++++++++++++------
 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c
index 9af5767..3731fc7 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c
@@ -578,7 +578,8 @@ static struct samsung_mux_clock exynos4210_mux_clks[] __initdata = {
 	MUX(0, "mout_fimd1", group1_p4210, E4210_SRC_LCD1, 0, 4),
 	MUX(0, "mout_mipi1", group1_p4210, E4210_SRC_LCD1, 12, 4),
 	MUX(CLK_SCLK_MPLL, "sclk_mpll", mout_mpll_p, SRC_CPU, 8, 1),
-	MUX(CLK_MOUT_CORE, "mout_core", mout_core_p4210, SRC_CPU, 16, 1),
+	MUX_F(CLK_MOUT_CORE, "mout_core", mout_core_p4210, SRC_CPU, 16, 1, 0,
+			CLK_MUX_READ_ONLY),
 	MUX(0, "mout_hpm", mout_core_p4210, SRC_CPU, 20, 1),
 	MUX(CLK_SCLK_VPLL, "sclk_vpll", sclk_vpll_p4210, SRC_TOP0, 8, 1),
 	MUX(CLK_MOUT_FIMC0, "mout_fimc0", group1_p4210, SRC_CAM, 0, 4),
@@ -714,15 +715,24 @@ static struct samsung_div_clock exynos4_div_clks[] __initdata = {
 	DIV(0, "div_clkout_rightbus", "mout_clkout_rightbus",
 			CLKOUT_CMU_RIGHTBUS, 8, 6),
 
-	DIV(0, "div_core", "mout_core", DIV_CPU0, 0, 3),
-	DIV(0, "div_corem0", "div_core2", DIV_CPU0, 4, 3),
-	DIV(0, "div_corem1", "div_core2", DIV_CPU0, 8, 3),
-	DIV(0, "div_periph", "div_core2", DIV_CPU0, 12, 3),
-	DIV(0, "div_atb", "mout_core", DIV_CPU0, 16, 3),
-	DIV(0, "div_pclk_dbg", "div_atb", DIV_CPU0, 20, 3),
-	DIV(CLK_ARM_CLK, "div_core2", "div_core", DIV_CPU0, 28, 3),
-	DIV(0, "div_copy", "mout_hpm", DIV_CPU1, 0, 3),
-	DIV(0, "div_hpm", "div_copy", DIV_CPU1, 4, 3),
+	DIV_F(0, "div_core", "mout_core", DIV_CPU0, 0, 3,
+			CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY),
+	DIV_F(0, "div_corem0", "div_core2", DIV_CPU0, 4, 3,
+			CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY),
+	DIV_F(0, "div_corem1", "div_core2", DIV_CPU0, 8, 3,
+			CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY),
+	DIV_F(0, "div_periph", "div_core2", DIV_CPU0, 12, 3,
+			CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY),
+	DIV_F(0, "div_atb", "mout_core", DIV_CPU0, 16, 3,
+			CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY),
+	DIV_F(0, "div_pclk_dbg", "div_atb", DIV_CPU0, 20, 3,
+			CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY),
+	DIV_F(CLK_ARM_CLK, "div_core2", "div_core", DIV_CPU0, 28, 3,
+			CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY),
+	DIV_F(0, "div_copy", "mout_hpm", DIV_CPU1, 0, 3,
+			CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY),
+	DIV_F(0, "div_hpm", "div_copy", DIV_CPU1, 4, 3,
+			CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY),
 	DIV(0, "div_clkout_cpu", "mout_clkout_cpu", CLKOUT_CMU_CPU, 8, 6),
 
 	DIV(0, "div_fimc0", "mout_fimc0", DIV_CAM, 0, 4),
@@ -769,7 +779,8 @@ static struct samsung_div_clock exynos4_div_clks[] __initdata = {
 	DIV(0, "div_spi_pre2", "div_spi2", DIV_PERIL2, 8, 8),
 	DIV(0, "div_audio1", "mout_audio1", DIV_PERIL4, 0, 4),
 	DIV(0, "div_audio2", "mout_audio2", DIV_PERIL4, 16, 4),
-	DIV(CLK_SCLK_APLL, "sclk_apll", "mout_apll", DIV_CPU0, 24, 3),
+	DIV_F(CLK_SCLK_APLL, "sclk_apll", "mout_apll", DIV_CPU0, 24, 3,
+			CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY),
 	DIV_F(0, "div_mipi_pre0", "div_mipi0", DIV_LCD0, 20, 4,
 			CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0),
 	DIV_F(0, "div_mmc_pre0", "div_mmc0", DIV_FSYS1, 8, 8,
@@ -1186,17 +1197,10 @@ static struct samsung_gate_clock exynos4x12_gate_clks[] __initdata = {
 		0),
 };
 
-static struct samsung_clock_alias exynos4_aliases[] __initdata = {
+static struct samsung_clock_alias exynos4x12_aliases[] __initdata = {
 	ALIAS(CLK_MOUT_CORE, NULL, "moutcore"),
 	ALIAS(CLK_ARM_CLK, NULL, "armclk"),
 	ALIAS(CLK_SCLK_APLL, NULL, "mout_apll"),
-};
-
-static struct samsung_clock_alias exynos4210_aliases[] __initdata = {
-	ALIAS(CLK_SCLK_MPLL, NULL, "mout_mpll"),
-};
-
-static struct samsung_clock_alias exynos4x12_aliases[] __initdata = {
 	ALIAS(CLK_MOUT_MPLL_USER_C, NULL, "mout_mpll"),
 };
 
@@ -1463,8 +1467,6 @@ static void __init exynos4_clk_init(struct device_node *np,
 			ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4210_div_clks));
 		samsung_clk_register_gate(ctx, exynos4210_gate_clks,
 			ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4210_gate_clks));
-		samsung_clk_register_alias(ctx, exynos4210_aliases,
-			ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4210_aliases));
 		samsung_clk_register_fixed_factor(ctx,
 			exynos4210_fixed_factor_clks,
 			ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4210_fixed_factor_clks));
@@ -1486,9 +1488,6 @@ static void __init exynos4_clk_init(struct device_node *np,
 			ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4x12_fixed_factor_clks));
 	}
 
-	samsung_clk_register_alias(ctx, exynos4_aliases,
-			ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4_aliases));
-
 	exynos4_core_down_clock(soc);
 	exynos4_clk_sleep_init();
 
@@ -1499,6 +1498,7 @@ static void __init exynos4_clk_init(struct device_node *np,
 		exynos4_soc == EXYNOS4210 ? "Exynos4210" : "Exynos4x12",
 		_get_rate("sclk_apll"),	_get_rate("sclk_mpll"),
 		_get_rate("sclk_epll"), _get_rate("sclk_vpll"),
+		exynos4_soc == EXYNOS4210 ? _get_rate("armclk") :
 		_get_rate("div_core2"));
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c
index e19e365..1d958f1 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c
@@ -291,14 +291,14 @@ static struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5250_mux_clks[] __initdata = {
 	/*
 	 * CMU_CPU
 	 */
-	MUX_FA(0, "mout_apll", mout_apll_p, SRC_CPU, 0, 1,
-					CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0, "mout_apll"),
-	MUX_A(0, "mout_cpu", mout_cpu_p, SRC_CPU, 16, 1, "mout_cpu"),
+	MUX_F(0, "mout_apll", mout_apll_p, SRC_CPU, 0, 1,
+			CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0),
+	MUX_F(0, "mout_cpu", mout_cpu_p, SRC_CPU, 16, 1, 0, CLK_MUX_READ_ONLY),
 
 	/*
 	 * CMU_CORE
 	 */
-	MUX_A(0, "mout_mpll", mout_mpll_p, SRC_CORE1, 8, 1, "mout_mpll"),
+	MUX(0, "mout_mpll", mout_mpll_p, SRC_CORE1, 8, 1),
 
 	/*
 	 * CMU_TOP
@@ -380,9 +380,12 @@ static struct samsung_div_clock exynos5250_div_clks[] __initdata = {
 	/*
 	 * CMU_CPU
 	 */
-	DIV(0, "div_arm", "mout_cpu", DIV_CPU0, 0, 3),
-	DIV(0, "div_apll", "mout_apll", DIV_CPU0, 24, 3),
-	DIV_A(0, "div_arm2", "div_arm", DIV_CPU0, 28, 3, "armclk"),
+	DIV_F(0, "div_arm", "mout_cpu", DIV_CPU0, 0, 3,
+			CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY),
+	DIV_F(0, "div_apll", "mout_apll", DIV_CPU0, 24, 3,
+			CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY),
+	DIV_F(0, "div_arm2", "div_arm", DIV_CPU0, 28, 3,
+			CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY),
 
 	/*
 	 * CMU_TOP
@@ -848,6 +851,6 @@ static void __init exynos5250_clk_init(struct device_node *np)
 	samsung_clk_of_add_provider(np, ctx);
 
 	pr_info("Exynos5250: clock setup completed, armclk=%ld\n",
-			_get_rate("div_arm2"));
+			_get_rate("armclk"));
 }
 CLK_OF_DECLARE(exynos5250_clk, "samsung,exynos5250-clock", exynos5250_clk_init);
diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
index d7ef36a..fcf365d 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
@@ -617,10 +617,14 @@ static struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5x_mux_clks[] __initdata = {
 	MUX(0, "mout_mspll_kfc", mout_mspll_cpu_p, SRC_TOP7, 8, 2),
 	MUX(0, "mout_mspll_cpu", mout_mspll_cpu_p, SRC_TOP7, 12, 2),
 
-	MUX(0, "mout_apll", mout_apll_p, SRC_CPU, 0, 1),
-	MUX(0, "mout_cpu", mout_cpu_p, SRC_CPU, 16, 1),
-	MUX(0, "mout_kpll", mout_kpll_p, SRC_KFC, 0, 1),
-	MUX(0, "mout_kfc", mout_kfc_p, SRC_KFC, 16, 1),
+	MUX_F(0, "mout_apll", mout_apll_p, SRC_CPU, 0, 1,
+				CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0),
+	MUX_F(0, "mout_cpu", mout_cpu_p, SRC_CPU, 16, 1, 0,
+				CLK_MUX_READ_ONLY),
+	MUX_F(0, "mout_kpll", mout_kpll_p, SRC_KFC, 0, 1,
+				CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0),
+	MUX_F(0, "mout_kfc", mout_kfc_p, SRC_KFC, 16, 1, 0,
+				CLK_MUX_READ_ONLY),
 
 	MUX(0, "mout_aclk200", mout_group1_p, SRC_TOP0, 8, 2),
 	MUX(0, "mout_aclk200_fsys2", mout_group1_p, SRC_TOP0, 12, 2),
@@ -776,11 +780,16 @@ static struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5x_mux_clks[] __initdata = {
 };
 
 static struct samsung_div_clock exynos5x_div_clks[] __initdata = {
-	DIV(0, "div_arm", "mout_cpu", DIV_CPU0, 0, 3),
-	DIV(0, "sclk_apll", "mout_apll", DIV_CPU0, 24, 3),
-	DIV(0, "armclk2", "div_arm", DIV_CPU0, 28, 3),
-	DIV(0, "div_kfc", "mout_kfc", DIV_KFC0, 0, 3),
-	DIV(0, "sclk_kpll", "mout_kpll", DIV_KFC0, 24, 3),
+	DIV_F(0, "div_arm", "mout_cpu", DIV_CPU0, 0, 3,
+			CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY),
+	DIV_F(0, "sclk_apll", "mout_apll", DIV_CPU0, 24, 3,
+			CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY),
+	DIV_F(0, "armclk2", "div_arm", DIV_CPU0, 28, 3,
+			CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY),
+	DIV_F(0, "div_kfc", "mout_kfc", DIV_KFC0, 0, 3,
+			CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY),
+	DIV_F(0, "sclk_kpll", "mout_kpll", DIV_KFC0, 24, 3,
+			CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY),
 
 	DIV(0, "dout_aclk400_isp", "mout_aclk400_isp", DIV_TOP0, 0, 3),
 	DIV(0, "dout_aclk400_mscl", "mout_aclk400_mscl", DIV_TOP0, 4, 3),
-- 
1.6.6.rc2

Re: [PATCH v11 4/6] ARM: Exynos: switch to using generic cpufreq driver for Exynos4210/5250/5420

[Amit Kucheria]

Hi Thomas,

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com> wrote:
> The new CPU clock type allows the use of generic CPUfreq drivers. So for
> Exynos4210/5250, switch to using generic cpufreq driver. For Exynos5420,
> which did not have CPUfreq driver support, enable the use of generic
> CPUfreq driver.
>
> Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
> Tested-by: Chander Kashyap <k.chander@samsung.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c |   24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
> index 6b283eb..a1be294 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
> @@ -282,6 +282,28 @@ static void __init exynos_init_irq(void)
>         exynos_map_pmu();
>  }
>
> +static const struct of_device_id exynos_cpufreq_matches[] = {
> +       { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5420", .data = "arm-bL-cpufreq-dt" },

While you're at it, can you add this to so we don't have to patch
kernels for the Chromebook2 and Odroid-XU3?

      { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5422", .data = "arm-bL-cpufreq-dt" },
      { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5800", .data = "arm-bL-cpufreq-dt" },


> +       { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5250", .data = "cpufreq-dt" },
> +       { .compatible = "samsung,exynos4210", .data = "cpufreq-dt" },
> +       { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5440", .data = "exynos5440-cpufreq" },
> +       { /* sentinel */ }

Re: [PATCH v11 4/6] ARM: Exynos: switch to using generic cpufreq driver for Exynos4210/5250/5420

[Thomas Abraham]

Hi Amit,

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org> wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com> wrote:
>> The new CPU clock type allows the use of generic CPUfreq drivers. So for
>> Exynos4210/5250, switch to using generic cpufreq driver. For Exynos5420,
>> which did not have CPUfreq driver support, enable the use of generic
>> CPUfreq driver.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
>> Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
>> Tested-by: Chander Kashyap <k.chander@samsung.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c |   24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
>> index 6b283eb..a1be294 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
>> @@ -282,6 +282,28 @@ static void __init exynos_init_irq(void)
>>         exynos_map_pmu();
>>  }
>>
>> +static const struct of_device_id exynos_cpufreq_matches[] = {
>> +       { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5420", .data = "arm-bL-cpufreq-dt" },
>
> While you're at it, can you add this to so we don't have to patch
> kernels for the Chromebook2 and Odroid-XU3?
>
>       { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5422", .data = "arm-bL-cpufreq-dt" },
>       { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5800", .data = "arm-bL-cpufreq-dt" },
>

Okay, I this has been included in the updated patches [1]

[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg380011.html

Thanks,
Thomas.

>
>> +       { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5250", .data = "cpufreq-dt" },
>> +       { .compatible = "samsung,exynos4210", .data = "cpufreq-dt" },
>> +       { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5440", .data = "exynos5440-cpufreq" },
>> +       { /* sentinel */ }
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH v11 4/6] ARM: Exynos: switch to using generic cpufreq driver for Exynos4210/5250/5420

[Kevin Hilman]

Hi Thomas,

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 4:41 AM, Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com> wrote:
> The new CPU clock type allows the use of generic CPUfreq drivers. So for
> Exynos4210/5250, switch to using generic cpufreq driver. For Exynos5420,
> which did not have CPUfreq driver support, enable the use of generic
> CPUfreq driver.
>
> Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
> Tested-by: Chander Kashyap <k.chander@samsung.com>

What's the status of the exynos5 CPUfreq support for upstream?  This
was pretty broadly reviewed and tested, but I still don't see this
either in linux-next or Kukjin's for-next.

Kevin

Re: [PATCH v11 4/6] ARM: Exynos: switch to using generic cpufreq driver for Exynos4210/5250/5420

[Thomas Abraham]

Hi Kevin,

On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 2:30 AM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org> wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 4:41 AM, Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com> wrote:
>> The new CPU clock type allows the use of generic CPUfreq drivers. So for
>> Exynos4210/5250, switch to using generic cpufreq driver. For Exynos5420,
>> which did not have CPUfreq driver support, enable the use of generic
>> CPUfreq driver.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
>> Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
>> Tested-by: Chander Kashyap <k.chander@samsung.com>
>
> What's the status of the exynos5 CPUfreq support for upstream?  This
> was pretty broadly reviewed and tested, but I still don't see this
> either in linux-next or Kukjin's for-next.

The rebased version of the patches have been posted [1]. My apologies
for the delay in following up on this patch series.

Thanks,
Thomas.

[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg380011.html

>
> Kevin
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH v11 4/6] ARM: Exynos: switch to using generic cpufreq driver for Exynos4210/5250/5420

[Sudeep Holla]

On 20/10/14 12:41, Thomas Abraham wrote:
> The new CPU clock type allows the use of generic CPUfreq drivers. So for
> Exynos4210/5250, switch to using generic cpufreq driver. For Exynos5420,
> which did not have CPUfreq driver support, enable the use of generic
> CPUfreq driver.
>
> Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
> Tested-by: Chander Kashyap <k.chander@samsung.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c |   24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
>   1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
> index 6b283eb..a1be294 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
> @@ -282,6 +282,28 @@ static void __init exynos_init_irq(void)
>   	exynos_map_pmu();
>   }
>
> +static const struct of_device_id exynos_cpufreq_matches[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "samsung,exynos5420", .data = "arm-bL-cpufreq-dt" },

Sorry for raising this issue always with Exynos cpufreq drivers. IMO the
bindings for "arm-bL-cpufreq-dt" is broken. Currently no one is using it
and it's better to fix it before we have a real user of it.

If you look at the binding document for it[1], it has a fixme which
shouldn't have been there at first place. It assumes the ordering of
CPU's specified in the DT and the logical index allocation to them.

It even breaks for hotplug especially if you hotplug-in back in
different order. We can work around that probably, but it's better to
fix the binding. I failed to grab much attention in my previous attempts
to address this[2]. Viresh also started a discussion more recently[3].

Regards,
Sudeep

[1] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/arm_big_little_dt.txt
[2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg303977.html
[3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/25/152

Re: [PATCH v11 4/6] ARM: Exynos: switch to using generic cpufreq driver for Exynos4210/5250/5420

[Viresh Kumar]

Oh, you are still alive? I thought you were about to get married :)
Just kidding !!

On 20 November 2014 00:58, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
> Sorry for raising this issue always with Exynos cpufreq drivers. IMO the
> bindings for "arm-bL-cpufreq-dt" is broken. Currently no one is using it
> and it's better to fix it before we have a real user of it.

Hmm, yeah if we can. I haven't found a easy way to go ahead and then
got caught in other activities.

> If you look at the binding document for it[1], it has a fixme which
> shouldn't have been there at first place. It assumes the ordering of
> CPU's specified in the DT and the logical index allocation to them.

Ok, I believe the FIXME is a bit outdated. From the code I can see only
this limitation.

- For every cluster, the cpu which boots up first should carry the OPPs.
Otherwise there is no restriction on ordering of CPUs.

- I believe CPUs boot in the order they are present in DT except for the
boot CPU. So, the first node for every cluster should have it.

Correct ? Then we can update the fixme.

> It even breaks for hotplug especially if you hotplug-in back in
> different order.

Hmm, I never thought about it. But yes the CPU with the OPPs should
be the first one to come back.

> We can work around that probably, but it's better to
> fix the binding. I failed to grab much attention in my previous attempts
> to address this[2]. Viresh also started a discussion more recently[3].

They are just stuck and went nowhere :(

Re: [PATCH v11 4/6] ARM: Exynos: switch to using generic cpufreq driver for Exynos4210/5250/5420

[Sudeep Holla]

On 20/11/14 03:48, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Oh, you are still alive? I thought you were about to get married :)
> Just kidding !!
>
> On 20 November 2014 00:58, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
>> Sorry for raising this issue always with Exynos cpufreq drivers. IMO the
>> bindings for "arm-bL-cpufreq-dt" is broken. Currently no one is using it
>> and it's better to fix it before we have a real user of it.
>
> Hmm, yeah if we can. I haven't found a easy way to go ahead and then
> got caught in other activities.
>

Agreed, it's not easy but needs to be fixed :)

>> If you look at the binding document for it[1], it has a fixme which
>> shouldn't have been there at first place. It assumes the ordering of
>> CPU's specified in the DT and the logical index allocation to them.
>
> Ok, I believe the FIXME is a bit outdated. From the code I can see only
> this limitation.
>
> - For every cluster, the cpu which boots up first should carry the OPPs.
> Otherwise there is no restriction on ordering of CPUs.
>

Not entirely true, it assuming the fact that the logical index provided 
by the OS is completely based on the ordering in the DT.

> - I believe CPUs boot in the order they are present in DT except for the
> boot CPU. So, the first node for every cluster should have it.
>
> Correct ? Then we can update the fixme.
>

No, I disagree as you trying to implicitly depend on the logic Linux 
uses to assign logical index. It can be changed any time, and depending
on it might break things in future which can't be fixed easily later
especially if it's DT related.

>> It even breaks for hotplug especially if you hotplug-in back in
>> different order.
>
> Hmm, I never thought about it. But yes the CPU with the OPPs should
> be the first one to come back.
>

How can you assume that ? I can write a simple test which hot-plugs out
all the CPUs in the (esp. multi-cluster) system in ascending order of
logical index and hot-plug back in descending order. Then the above
logic fails.

>> We can work around that probably, but it's better to
>> fix the binding. I failed to grab much attention in my previous attempts
>> to address this[2]. Viresh also started a discussion more recently[3].
>
> They are just stuck and went nowhere :(
>

The platforms needing it have to get involved in such discussions to
make any progress.

Regards,
Sudeep

Re: [PATCH v11 4/6] ARM: Exynos: switch to using generic cpufreq driver for Exynos4210/5250/5420

[Viresh Kumar]

On 24 November 2014 at 19:14, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
> On 20/11/14 03:48, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> - I believe CPUs boot in the order they are present in DT except for the
>> boot CPU. So, the first node for every cluster should have it.
>>
>> Correct ? Then we can update the fixme.
>>
>
> No, I disagree as you trying to implicitly depend on the logic Linux uses to
> assign logical index. It can be changed any time, and depending
> on it might break things in future which can't be fixed easily later
> especially if it's DT related.

Yeah, correct.

>> Hmm, I never thought about it. But yes the CPU with the OPPs should
>> be the first one to come back.
>>
>
> How can you assume that ? I can write a simple test which hot-plugs out
> all the CPUs in the (esp. multi-cluster) system in ascending order of
> logical index and hot-plug back in descending order. Then the above
> logic fails.

What I said is: Yes the CPU with the OPPs should be the first one to come
back, if this has to work correctly. Otherwise it will break..

And you repeated the same :)

> The platforms needing it have to get involved in such discussions to
> make any progress.

Yes there were people involved. I hope I cc'd you as well...