From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Preeti Murthy <preeti.lkml@gmail.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
patches@linaro.org, Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/5] cpuidle: idle: menu: Don't reflect when a state selection failed
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 19:28:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <544FE032.5050900@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM4v1pO9e7r10KX=D=9aVTV_ecvPa-aJOoB6PAwR5jxMS3eg4w@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/28/2014 08:01 AM, Preeti Murthy wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
>> In the current code, the check to reflect or not the outcoming state is done
>> against the idle state which has been chosen and its value.
>>
>> Instead of doing a check in each of the reflect functions, just don't call reflect
>> if something went wrong in the idle path.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>> Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c | 3 +--
>> drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c | 4 +---
>> kernel/sched/idle.c | 3 ++-
>> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c
>> index fb396d6..c0b36a8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c
>> @@ -165,8 +165,7 @@ static int ladder_enable_device(struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
>> static void ladder_reflect(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int index)
>> {
>> struct ladder_device *ldev = &__get_cpu_var(ladder_devices);
>> - if (index > 0)
>> - ldev->last_state_idx = index;
>> + ldev->last_state_idx = index;
>> }
>>
>> static struct cpuidle_governor ladder_governor = {
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
>> index a17515f..3907301 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
>> @@ -365,9 +365,7 @@ static int menu_select(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>> static void menu_reflect(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int index)
>> {
>> struct menu_device *data = &__get_cpu_var(menu_devices);
>> - data->last_state_idx = index;
>> - if (index >= 0)
>> - data->needs_update = 1;
>> + data->needs_update = 1;
>
> Why is the last_state_idx not getting updated ?
Oups, right. This is missing.
Thanks for pointing this out.
By the way, I don't think a back end driver is changing the selected
state currently and I am not sure this is desirable since we want to
trust the state we are going (as a best effort). So if the 'enter'
function does not change the index, that means the last_state_idx has
not to be changed since it has been assigned in the 'select' function.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-28 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-23 9:01 [PATCH V2 1/5] sched: idle: cpuidle: Check the latency req before idle Daniel Lezcano
2014-10-23 9:01 ` [PATCH V2 2/5] sched: idle: Get the next timer event and pass it the cpuidle framework Daniel Lezcano
2014-10-23 9:01 ` [PATCH V2 3/5] cpuidle: idle: menu: Don't reflect when a state selection failed Daniel Lezcano
2014-10-28 2:01 ` Len Brown
2014-10-28 19:15 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-10-28 7:01 ` Preeti Murthy
2014-10-28 18:28 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2014-10-29 1:44 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-10-29 16:54 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-10-29 21:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-23 9:01 ` [PATCH V2 4/5] cpuidle: menu: Fix the get_typical_interval Daniel Lezcano
2014-10-23 16:43 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-10-28 2:48 ` Len Brown
2014-10-29 18:15 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-10-23 9:01 ` [PATCH V2 5/5] cpuidle: menu: Move the update function before its declaration Daniel Lezcano
2014-10-23 16:47 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-10-28 2:53 ` Len Brown
2014-10-28 3:51 ` [PATCH V2 1/5] sched: idle: cpuidle: Check the latency req before idle Preeti Murthy
2014-10-28 18:59 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-10-29 2:01 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-11-05 14:28 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-11-06 4:08 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-11-06 12:27 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-11-07 4:23 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-11-06 13:42 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-11-07 4:29 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-11-07 9:35 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-11-05 21:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-11-05 21:41 ` Daniel Lezcano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=544FE032.5050900@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=preeti.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).