linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: "rjw@rjwysocki.net" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	"preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"lenb@kernel.org" <lenb@kernel.org>,
	"nsekhar@ti.com" <nsekhar@ti.com>,
	"khilman@deeprootsystems.com" <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>,
	"shawn.guo@linaro.org" <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
	"kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	"tony@atomide.com" <tony@atomide.com>,
	"kgene.kim@samsung.com" <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
	"horms@verge.net.au" <horms@verge.net.au>,
	"magnus.damm@gmail.com" <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
	"swarren@wwwdotorg.org" <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
	"thierry.reding@gmail.com" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	"ralf@linux-mips.org" <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"michal.simek@xilinx.com" <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-a
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: Invert CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID logic
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 13:53:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5469EFBB.6000806@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141113145609.GA9726@red-moon>

On 11/13/2014 03:56 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:03:50PM +0000, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> The only place where the time is invalid is when the ACPI_CSTATE_FFH entry
>> method is not set. Otherwise for all the drivers, the time can be correctly
>> measured.
>>
>> Instead of duplicating the CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID flag in all the drivers
>> for all the states, just invert the logic by replacing it by the flag
>> CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_INVALID, hence we can set this flag only for the acpi idle
>> driver, remove the former flag from all the drivers and invert the logic with
>> this flag in the different governor.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>
> Are we sure that ACPI C1 invalid residency time is *still* an issue after
> we moved the residency accounting to the idle core ?

(Cc'ed linux-acpi@)

Hi x86 guys,

any comment on that ?

Thanks in advance

  -- Daniel

> I have a feeling you can remove this flag entirely, but I will let x86
> guys speak for themselves.

[ ... ]

>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
>> index 17f9ec5..380b4b4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
>> @@ -985,8 +985,8 @@ static int acpi_processor_setup_cpuidle_states(struct acpi_processor *pr)
>>                  state->flags = 0;
>>                  switch (cx->type) {
>>                          case ACPI_STATE_C1:
>> -                       if (cx->entry_method == ACPI_CSTATE_FFH)
>> -                               state->flags |= CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID;
>> +                       if (cx->entry_method != ACPI_CSTATE_FFH)
>> +                               state->flags |= CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_INVALID;

[ ... ]


-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-11-17 12:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-12 15:03 [PATCH] cpuidle: Invert CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID logic Daniel Lezcano
2014-11-13 14:56 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-11-13 15:14   ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-11-17 12:53   ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2014-11-14 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5469EFBB.6000806@linaro.org \
    --to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    --cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
    --cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
    --cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).