From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: thermal: Exynos: Deletion of unnecessary checks before two function
 calls
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 14:25:45 +0100
Message-ID: <546F3D59.2060504@users.sourceforge.net>
References: <5307CAA2.8060406@users.sourceforge.net> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402212321410.2043@localhost6.localdomain6> <530A086E.8010901@users.sourceforge.net> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402231635510.1985@localhost6.localdomain6> <530A72AA.3000601@users.sourceforge.net> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402240658210.2090@localhost6.localdomain6> <530B5FB6.6010207@users.sourceforge.net> <alpine.DEB.2.10.1402241710370.2074@hadrien> <530C5E18.1020800@users.sourceforge.net> <alpine.DEB.2.10.1402251014170.2080@hadrien> <530CD2C4.4050903@users.sourceforge.net> <alpine.DEB.2.10.1402251840450.7035@hadrien> <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402252117150.2047@localhost6.localdomain6> <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402262129250.2221@localhost6.localdomain6> <5317A59D.4@users.so
 urceforge.net> <546F1017.5080403@users.sourceforge.net> <alpine.DEB.2.10.1411211116580.2554@hadrien>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1411211116580.2554@hadrien>
Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org

>>  	for (i = 0; i < th_zone->cool_dev_size; i++) {
>> -		if (th_zone->cool_dev[i])
>> -			cpufreq_cooling_unregister(th_zone->cool_dev[i]);
>> +		cpufreq_cooling_unregister(th_zone->cool_dev[i]);
>>  	}
> 
> Now you have unnecessary {}

How are the chances that your source code transformation tool
can also consider the deletion of curly brackets in such an use case?

Can any more pretty-printing rules be integrated from a specific
coding style configuration?

Regards,
Markus