From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Prarit Bhargava Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] cpufreq: stats: cleanups Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 09:56:13 -0500 Message-ID: <54A2BD0D.5010203@redhat.com> References: <3949258.uE4XDaD9A7@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38661 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751374AbaL3O4U (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2014 09:56:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Lists linaro-kernel , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" On 12/28/2014 11:41 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 19 December 2014 at 07:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Thursday, December 18, 2014 05:30:17 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: >>> Hi Rafael, >>> >>> I finally started looking at how to make cpufreq-core somewhat less complex with >>> respect to locking, its state machine, etc.. >>> >>> The first thing I had to get into was cpufreq-stats and so this series. Mostly >>> cleanups to make things better.. >>> >>> Please see if they make any sense at all. >>> >>> I know we are at Merge window right now and you wouldn't apply it even to >>> linux-next. So, if they look fine, please don't hesitate in dropping a mail to >>> confirm they look fine, so that I can send the next set of cleanups atleast for >>> reviews. We can get these applied one by one then, once we are a bit confident >>> of them. >> >> Well, the timing is pretty bad for various reasons. For one, this isn't 3.19 >> material, so I'm not even going to look at it tomorrow and I'm officially on >> vacation from Monday onward pretty much through the first half of January. >> >> If I have some time and really nothing else to do, I'll have a look at it, but >> I can't promise anything. >> >> It would be good if you could ask poeple to have a look at it and give comments >> in the meantime. > > Prarit, any more comments about this series ? > > Latest stuff is here: > git://git.linaro.org/people/viresh.kumar/linux.git cpufreq/stats/cleanups Hey Viresh, seems fine to me. I do want to again point out the issue with the sysfs removal but fixing that type of issue is out-of-scope for this patchset. Reviewed-by: Prarit Bhargava P. > > -- > viresh >