From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drivers: cpuidle: add driver/device checks in cpuidle_enter_freeze() Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:30:49 +0100 Message-ID: <54EDDC99.40208@linaro.org> References: <1424800730-32059-1-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> <1424800730-32059-3-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com ([209.85.212.173]:51643 "EHLO mail-wi0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751963AbbBYOax (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:30:53 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id bs8so33824064wib.0 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 06:30:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1424800730-32059-3-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Lorenzo Pieralisi , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" On 02/24/2015 06:58 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > The changes in commit: > > 381063133246 ("PM / sleep: Re-implement suspend-to-idle handling") > > let suspend-to-idle code bypass the cpuidle_select() function to > enter the deepest idle state. The sanity checks carried out in > cpuidle_select() are bypassed too and this can cause breakage > on systems that try to suspend-to-idle with no registered cpuidle > driver. > > This patch factors out a function cpuidle_device_disabled() that > is used to carry out sanity checks (ie CPUidle is disabled on the > cpu executing the code) in both cpuidle_select() and cpuidle_enter_fr= eeze() > so that the checks are unified and carried out in both control paths. > > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki > Cc: Daniel Lezcano > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi > --- > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 18 +++++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c > index f47edc6c..344fe6c 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c > +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c > @@ -44,6 +44,12 @@ void disable_cpuidle(void) > off =3D 1; > } > > +static bool cpuidle_device_disabled(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, > + struct cpuidle_device *dev) > +{ > + return (off || !initialized || !drv || !dev || !dev->enabled); > +} This is getting a bit fuzzy IMO. What means disabled ? :) > /** > * cpuidle_play_dead - cpu off-lining > * > @@ -124,6 +130,11 @@ void cpuidle_enter_freeze(void) > struct cpuidle_driver *drv =3D cpuidle_get_cpu_driver(dev); > int index; I think this is exploding before because of dev =3D=3D NULL in the line= above. > + if (cpuidle_device_disabled(drv, dev)) { > + arch_cpu_idle(); > + return; > + } > + > /* > * Find the deepest state with ->enter_freeze present, which guara= ntees > * that interrupts won't be enabled when it exits and allows the t= ick to > @@ -202,11 +213,8 @@ int cpuidle_enter_state(struct cpuidle_device *d= ev, struct cpuidle_driver *drv, > */ > int cpuidle_select(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_devic= e *dev) > { > - if (off || !initialized) > - return -ENODEV; > - > - if (!drv || !dev || !dev->enabled) > - return -EBUSY; > + if (cpuidle_device_disabled(drv, dev)) > + return -1; > > return cpuidle_curr_governor->select(drv, dev); > } > --=20 Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software fo= r ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog