From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/6] Add CPUIdle support for Renesas SoCs Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 16:32:26 +0100 Message-ID: <54FDBD0A.5060001@linaro.org> References: <1425444946-3084-1-git-send-email-keita.kobayashi.ym@renesas.com> <54F89A23.1060008@linaro.org> <54F97599.7050904@renesas.com> <20150309152155.GC456@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150309152155.GC456@linaro.org> Sender: linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org To: keita kobayashi Cc: Lina Iyer , horms@verge.net.au, rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, magnus.damm@gmail.com List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 03/09/2015 04:21 PM, Lina Iyer wrote: > On Fri, Mar 06 2015 at 02:38 -0700, keita kobayashi wrote: >> Hi Daniel [ ... ] >>> >>> Hi Keita, >>> >>> the platform approach to pass private data from the arch specific t= o >>> the cpuidle driver no longer accepted. Unfortunately, there is no >>> alternate solution upstream. >>> >>> But hopefully, there is a patchset [1] submitted for upstreaming >>> which unify arm32/64 into a single generic cpuidle driver and use t= he >>> DT to define the idle functions to be used. >>> >>> I suggest you have a look at this patchset if it can fit your need. >>> >>> -- Daniel >>> >>> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/3/271 >> >> Thank you for information. >> I will take a look at the patch series. > > Hi Kieta, > > Please also have a look at the v15 of the cpuidle support for QCOM So= C. > Sent just now. It is based on [1]. Lina's patchset is available at: https://www.mail-archive.com/devicetree@vger.kernel.org/msg64700.html Thanks -- Daniel --=20 Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software fo= r ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog