From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 7/8] ARM: cpuidle: Register per cpuidle device Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 12:44:27 +0100 Message-ID: <550AB69B.8000100@linaro.org> References: <1426704372-20406-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <1426704372-20406-8-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <20150319110806.GE24556@red-moon> <550AB298.6040907@linaro.org> <20150319113824.GC4449@red-moon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150319113824.GC4449@red-moon> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Lorenzo Pieralisi Cc: "rjw@rjwysocki.net" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Catalin Marinas , "robherring2@gmail.com" , "arnd@arndb.de" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "lina.iyer@linaro.org" List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 03/19/2015 12:38 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:27:20AM +0000, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > [...] > >>>> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { >>>> ret =3D arm_cpuidle_init(cpu); >>>> + >>>> + /* This cpu does not support any idle states */ >>>> + if (ret =3D=3D -ENOSYS) >>>> + continue; >>>> + >>>> if (ret) { >>>> pr_err("CPU %d failed to init idle CPU ops\n", cpu); >>>> - return ret; >>>> + goto out_fail; >>>> + } >>>> + >>>> + dev =3D kzalloc(sizeof(*dev), GFP_KERNEL); >>>> + if (!dev) { >>>> + pr_err("Failed to allocate cpuidle device\n"); >>>> + goto out_fail; >>>> + } >>>> + >>>> + dev->cpu =3D cpu; >>>> + per_cpu(cpuidle_arm_dev, cpu) =3D dev; >>>> + >>>> + ret =3D cpuidle_register_device(dev); >>>> + if (ret) { >>>> + pr_err("Failed to register cpuidle device for CPU %d\n", >>>> + cpu); >>>> + kfree(dev); >>>> + goto out_fail; >>>> } >>>> } >>>> +out: >>>> + return ret; >>> >>> return 0; >>> >>>> >>>> - return cpuidle_register(drv, NULL); >>>> +out_fail: >>>> + for (cpu--; cpu <=3D 0; cpu--) { >>> >>> This loop is wrong. >> >> Why is it wrong ? We have to initialize at cpu - 1 to unregister the >> previous registered cpu, not the current one, no ? > > Yes, but on cpu>=3D0 not cpu<=3D0 > > while (--cpu >=3D 0) Ah, yes. Thanks for spotting this. -- Daniel --=20 Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software fo= r ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog