linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	sboyd@codeaurora.org, prarit@redhat.com,
	Srivatsa Bhat <srivatsa@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 00/20] cpufreq: Don't loose cpufreq history on CPU hotplug
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 17:33:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <550B6AEE.1060603@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1424345053.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

On 02/19/2015 03:32 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> The aim of this series is to stop managing cpufreq sysfs directories on CPU
> hotplugs.
>
> Currently on removal of a 'cpu != policy->cpu', we remove its sysfs directories
> by removing the soft-link. And on removal of policy->cpu, we migrate the sysfs
> directories to the next cpu. But if policy->cpu was the last CPU, we remove the
> policy completely and allocate it again as soon as the CPUs come back. This has
> shortcomings:
>
> - Code Complexity
> - Slower hotplug
> - sysfs file permissions are reset after all policy->cpus are offlined
> - CPUFreq stats history lost after all policy->cpus are offlined
> - Special management of sysfs stuff during suspend/resume
>
>
> To make things simple we stop playing with sysfs files unless the driver is
> getting removed. Also the policy is kept intact to be used later.
>
> First few patches provide a clean base for others *more important* patches.
>
> Rebased-over: your bleeding edge branch as there were dependencies on my earlier
> patches.
>
> Pushed here:
>
> git://git.linaro.org/people/viresh.kumar/linux.git cpufreq/core/sysfs
>
> v1->V2:
> - Dropped the idea of using policy-lists for getting policy for any cpu
> - Also dropped fallback list and its per-cpu variable
> - Stopped cleaning cpufreq_cpu_data and doing list_del(policy) on logical
>    hotplug.
> - Added support for physical hotplug of CPUs (Untested).
>
> @Srivatsa: Can you please have a look at the above change? I have cc'd you only
> on this one.
>
> Saravana Kannan (1):
>    cpufreq: Track cpu managing sysfs kobjects separately
>
> Cc: Srivatsa Bhat <srivatsa@mit.edu>
>
> Viresh Kumar (19):
>    cpufreq: Add doc style comment about cpufreq_cpu_{get|put}()
>    cpufreq: Merge __cpufreq_add_dev() and cpufreq_add_dev()
>    cpufreq: Throw warning when we try to get policy for an invalid CPU
>    cpufreq: Keep a single path for adding managed CPUs
>    cpufreq: Clear policy->cpus even for the last CPU
>    cpufreq: Create for_each_{in}active_policy()
>    cpufreq: Call schedule_work() for the last active policy
>    cpufreq: Don't clear cpufreq_cpu_data and policy list for inactive
>      policies
>    cpufreq: Get rid of cpufreq_cpu_data_fallback
>    cpufreq: Don't traverse list of all policies for adding policy for a
>      cpu
>    cpufreq: Manage governor usage history with 'policy->last_governor'
>    cpufreq: Mark policy->governor = NULL for inactive policies
>    cpufreq: Don't allow updating inactive-policies from sysfs
>    cpufreq: Stop migrating sysfs files on hotplug
>    cpufreq: Remove cpufreq_update_policy()
>    cpufreq: Initialize policy->kobj while allocating policy
>    cpufreq: Call cpufreq_policy_put_kobj() from cpufreq_policy_free()
>    cpufreq: Restart governor as soon as possible
>    cpufreq: Add support for physical hoplug of CPUs
>
>   drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 593 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>   include/linux/cpufreq.h   |   5 +-
>   2 files changed, 340 insertions(+), 258 deletions(-)
>

Just so it's clear I'm looking at these patches, I'm acking each patch 
as and when I look at them.

I might come back and nack some of them if I find an issue with patch N 
while looking at patch N + M. When I ack the last patch in the series, 
all my previous acks can be considered as final as they can be.

-Saravana

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-20  0:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-19 11:32 [PATCH V2 00/20] cpufreq: Don't loose cpufreq history on CPU hotplug Viresh Kumar
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 01/20] cpufreq: Add doc style comment about cpufreq_cpu_{get|put}() Viresh Kumar
2015-03-20  0:34   ` Saravana Kannan
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 02/20] cpufreq: Merge __cpufreq_add_dev() and cpufreq_add_dev() Viresh Kumar
2015-03-20  0:34   ` Saravana Kannan
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 03/20] cpufreq: Throw warning when we try to get policy for an invalid CPU Viresh Kumar
2015-03-20  0:34   ` Saravana Kannan
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 04/20] cpufreq: Keep a single path for adding managed CPUs Viresh Kumar
2015-03-20  0:37   ` Saravana Kannan
2015-03-20  3:16     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 05/20] cpufreq: Clear policy->cpus even for the last CPU Viresh Kumar
2015-03-20  0:43   ` Saravana Kannan
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 06/20] cpufreq: Create for_each_{in}active_policy() Viresh Kumar
2015-03-20  1:01   ` Saravana Kannan
2015-03-20  4:41     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-20 19:18       ` Saravana Kannan
2015-05-07 22:11         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-05-08  2:33           ` Viresh Kumar
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 07/20] cpufreq: Call schedule_work() for the last active policy Viresh Kumar
2015-04-02  3:40   ` Saravana Kannan
2015-04-02  5:02     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-07 22:13       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-05-08  2:36         ` Viresh Kumar
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 08/20] cpufreq: Don't clear cpufreq_cpu_data and policy list for inactive policies Viresh Kumar
2015-04-02  4:14   ` Saravana Kannan
2015-04-02  5:11     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 09/20] cpufreq: Get rid of cpufreq_cpu_data_fallback Viresh Kumar
2015-04-02  4:20   ` Saravana Kannan
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 10/20] cpufreq: Don't traverse list of all policies for adding policy for a cpu Viresh Kumar
2015-04-02  4:24   ` Saravana Kannan
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 11/20] cpufreq: Manage governor usage history with 'policy->last_governor' Viresh Kumar
2015-04-02  4:34   ` Saravana Kannan
2015-04-02  5:26     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 12/20] cpufreq: Mark policy->governor = NULL for inactive policies Viresh Kumar
2015-04-02  4:38   ` Saravana Kannan
2015-04-02  6:09     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-04-04  1:20       ` Saravana Kannan
2015-04-04  3:07         ` Viresh Kumar
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 13/20] cpufreq: Don't allow updating inactive-policies from sysfs Viresh Kumar
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 14/20] cpufreq: Track cpu managing sysfs kobjects separately Viresh Kumar
2015-04-02  4:40   ` Saravana Kannan
2015-04-02  5:41     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 15/20] cpufreq: Stop migrating sysfs files on hotplug Viresh Kumar
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 16/20] cpufreq: Remove cpufreq_update_policy() Viresh Kumar
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 17/20] cpufreq: Initialize policy->kobj while allocating policy Viresh Kumar
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 18/20] cpufreq: Call cpufreq_policy_put_kobj() from cpufreq_policy_free() Viresh Kumar
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 19/20] cpufreq: Restart governor as soon as possible Viresh Kumar
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 20/20] cpufreq: Add support for physical hoplug of CPUs Viresh Kumar
2015-02-27  5:26 ` [PATCH V2 00/20] cpufreq: Don't loose cpufreq history on CPU hotplug Viresh Kumar
2015-02-28  2:36   ` Saravana Kannan
2015-03-16  9:45     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-17 22:13       ` Saravana Kannan
2015-03-26 11:59         ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-26 20:28           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-26 20:41             ` Saravana Kannan
2015-03-27  5:15             ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-20  0:33 ` Saravana Kannan [this message]
2015-05-07 22:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=550B6AEE.1060603@codeaurora.org \
    --to=skannan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=srivatsa@mit.edu \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).