linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	sboyd@codeaurora.org, prarit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 04/20] cpufreq: Keep a single path for adding managed CPUs
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 17:37:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <550B6BD9.7080602@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ff44aa28b7c344936cbc43cfcff7efac92ad9700.1424345053.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

On 02/19/2015 03:32 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> There are two cases when we may try to add already managed CPUs:
The term manages CPUs is a bit unclear/confusing. When I hear managed 
CPUs, I think CPUs that are already marked in policy->cpus and the 
governor has already been started on them.

Can you clarify this commit text please?

> - On boot, the first cpu has marked all policy->cpus managed and so we will find
>    policy for all other policy->cpus later on.
> - When a managed cpu is hotplugged out and later brought back in.
>
> Currently we manage these two with separate paths and checks. While the first
> one is detected by testing cpu against 'policy->cpus', the other one is detected
> by testing cpu against 'policy->related_cpus'.
>
> We can manage both these via a single path and there is no need to do special
> checking for the first one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
>   drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 12 +++++-------
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 9da8ed5bdd21..d06d1241a900 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -992,6 +992,10 @@ static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>   	int ret = 0;
>   	unsigned long flags;
>
> +	/* Is cpu already managed ? */
> +	if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus))
> +		return 0;
> +
>   	if (has_target()) {
>   		ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
>   		if (ret) {
> @@ -1147,16 +1151,10 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
>
>   	pr_debug("adding CPU %u\n", cpu);
>
> -	/* check whether a different CPU already registered this
> -	 * CPU because it is in the same boat. */
> -	policy = cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(cpu);
> -	if (unlikely(policy))
> -		return 0;
> -
>   	if (!down_read_trylock(&cpufreq_rwsem))
>   		return 0;
>
> -	/* Check if this cpu was hot-unplugged earlier and has siblings */
> +	/* Check if this cpu already has a policy to manage it */
>   	read_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
>   	for_each_policy(policy) {
>   		if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus)) {
>

If comment text is fixed,
Acked-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>

-Saravana

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-20  0:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-19 11:32 [PATCH V2 00/20] cpufreq: Don't loose cpufreq history on CPU hotplug Viresh Kumar
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 01/20] cpufreq: Add doc style comment about cpufreq_cpu_{get|put}() Viresh Kumar
2015-03-20  0:34   ` Saravana Kannan
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 02/20] cpufreq: Merge __cpufreq_add_dev() and cpufreq_add_dev() Viresh Kumar
2015-03-20  0:34   ` Saravana Kannan
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 03/20] cpufreq: Throw warning when we try to get policy for an invalid CPU Viresh Kumar
2015-03-20  0:34   ` Saravana Kannan
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 04/20] cpufreq: Keep a single path for adding managed CPUs Viresh Kumar
2015-03-20  0:37   ` Saravana Kannan [this message]
2015-03-20  3:16     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 05/20] cpufreq: Clear policy->cpus even for the last CPU Viresh Kumar
2015-03-20  0:43   ` Saravana Kannan
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 06/20] cpufreq: Create for_each_{in}active_policy() Viresh Kumar
2015-03-20  1:01   ` Saravana Kannan
2015-03-20  4:41     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-20 19:18       ` Saravana Kannan
2015-05-07 22:11         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-05-08  2:33           ` Viresh Kumar
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 07/20] cpufreq: Call schedule_work() for the last active policy Viresh Kumar
2015-04-02  3:40   ` Saravana Kannan
2015-04-02  5:02     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-07 22:13       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-05-08  2:36         ` Viresh Kumar
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 08/20] cpufreq: Don't clear cpufreq_cpu_data and policy list for inactive policies Viresh Kumar
2015-04-02  4:14   ` Saravana Kannan
2015-04-02  5:11     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 09/20] cpufreq: Get rid of cpufreq_cpu_data_fallback Viresh Kumar
2015-04-02  4:20   ` Saravana Kannan
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 10/20] cpufreq: Don't traverse list of all policies for adding policy for a cpu Viresh Kumar
2015-04-02  4:24   ` Saravana Kannan
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 11/20] cpufreq: Manage governor usage history with 'policy->last_governor' Viresh Kumar
2015-04-02  4:34   ` Saravana Kannan
2015-04-02  5:26     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 12/20] cpufreq: Mark policy->governor = NULL for inactive policies Viresh Kumar
2015-04-02  4:38   ` Saravana Kannan
2015-04-02  6:09     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-04-04  1:20       ` Saravana Kannan
2015-04-04  3:07         ` Viresh Kumar
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 13/20] cpufreq: Don't allow updating inactive-policies from sysfs Viresh Kumar
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 14/20] cpufreq: Track cpu managing sysfs kobjects separately Viresh Kumar
2015-04-02  4:40   ` Saravana Kannan
2015-04-02  5:41     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 15/20] cpufreq: Stop migrating sysfs files on hotplug Viresh Kumar
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 16/20] cpufreq: Remove cpufreq_update_policy() Viresh Kumar
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 17/20] cpufreq: Initialize policy->kobj while allocating policy Viresh Kumar
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 18/20] cpufreq: Call cpufreq_policy_put_kobj() from cpufreq_policy_free() Viresh Kumar
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 19/20] cpufreq: Restart governor as soon as possible Viresh Kumar
2015-02-19 11:32 ` [PATCH V2 20/20] cpufreq: Add support for physical hoplug of CPUs Viresh Kumar
2015-02-27  5:26 ` [PATCH V2 00/20] cpufreq: Don't loose cpufreq history on CPU hotplug Viresh Kumar
2015-02-28  2:36   ` Saravana Kannan
2015-03-16  9:45     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-17 22:13       ` Saravana Kannan
2015-03-26 11:59         ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-26 20:28           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-26 20:41             ` Saravana Kannan
2015-03-27  5:15             ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-20  0:33 ` Saravana Kannan
2015-05-07 22:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=550B6BD9.7080602@codeaurora.org \
    --to=skannan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).