From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sudeep Holla Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: arm_big_little: check if the frequency is set correctly Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 16:14:34 +0100 Message-ID: <552BDD5A.8030107@arm.com> References: <1427718438-31098-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <551951F4.9070804@arm.com> <20150331014854.25195.34023@quantum> <551A67CD.50602@arm.com> <20150401214814.14369.56281@quantum> <551D03E9.508@arm.com> <20150413050825.19585.17809@quantum> <552B989C.30805@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:60148 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754039AbbDMPOh (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Apr 2015 11:14:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Sudeep Holla , Michael Turquette , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" On 13/04/15 11:25, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 13 April 2015 at 15:51, Sudeep Holla wrote: >> Thanks Mike. >> >> Viresh, is it OK if we carry this patch until the clk framework can >> handle this case ? I will add a *TODO* stating it's temporary change >> and can be dropped once the clk layer handle it if that helps in any way >> :). >> >> This issue is seen on TC2 when firmware is stress tested with continuous >> DVFS requests. > > Sure. > Thanks, will repost the patches again after merge window to avoid it getting lost during the merge window. Regards, Sudeep