From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Axel Haslam Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [RFC] PM / Domains: add multiple states Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 15:32:24 +0200 Message-ID: <552FB9E8.90401@baylibre.com> References: <1428507725-12205-1-git-send-email-ahaslam@baylibre.com> <1428507725-12205-2-git-send-email-ahaslam@baylibre.com> <552B9BAD.9050809@baylibre.com> <552E59F4.4080008@baylibre.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com ([209.85.212.170]:36890 "EHLO mail-wi0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757346AbbDPNcb (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Apr 2015 09:32:31 -0400 Received: by widdi4 with SMTP id di4so97621185wid.0 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 06:32:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Ulf Hansson Cc: Kevin Hilman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Benoit Cousson Hi Uffe, > > Correct. > > So what do you think of always saving and restoring context, would > that work for your case? It would work for me, because im not really looking to optimize latency at this point. Would you think it would be possible to add multiple states to genpd as a first step, and then maybe discuss about context save/restore optimizations? if yes, i could remove the context save/restore stuff from the multiple states patch. Regards, Axel > > Kind regards > Uffe >