From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT 2/6] clk: qcom: Add runtime support to handle clocks using PM clocks
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:28:15 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <553A21C7.4060506@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFpVXWGeO_kbOvPbdy83aN6wxkC77ydH_2C3Bo=5QsspoA@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/24/2015 03:33 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 23 April 2015 at 10:45, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> Add runtime PM support to handle (core and iface) clocks for devices
>> without a controllable power domain. Once the drivers for these devices
>> are converted to use runtime PM apis, all clock handling (for core and
>> iface) from these drivers can then be removed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c
>> index 480ebf6..92b0f6d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c
>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>> #include <linux/err.h>
>> #include <linux/jiffies.h>
>> #include <linux/pm_clock.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>> #include "gdsc.h"
>>
>> @@ -226,3 +227,22 @@ void gdsc_unregister(struct device *dev)
>> {
>> of_genpd_del_provider(dev->of_node);
>> }
>> +
>> +static struct dev_pm_domain default_qcom_pm_domain = {
>> + .ops = {
>> + USE_PM_CLK_RUNTIME_OPS
>> + USE_PLATFORM_PM_SLEEP_OPS
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct pm_clk_notifier_block qcom_pm_notifier = {
>> + .pm_domain = &default_qcom_pm_domain,
>> + .con_ids = { "core", "iface" },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int __init qcom_pm_runtime_init(void)
>> +{
>> + pm_clk_add_notifier(&platform_bus_type, &qcom_pm_notifier);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +core_initcall(qcom_pm_runtime_init);
>
> First, I don't follow how this code is related to GDSC.
Actually its not. I should probably move it to a pm_runtime.c someplace
in drivers/soc/qcom maybe.
>
> Second, I want to see less users of pm_clk_add_notifier() since it's
> not the proper/long-term way of how to assign PM domain pointers to a
> device. Instead that shall be done at device registration point. In
> your case while parsing the DT nodes and adding devices onto to their
> buses.
but these are devices which do not really have a controllable power
domain, they just have controllable clocks.
>
> Yes, I understand that it will requires quite some work to adopt to
> this behaviour - but that how it shall be done.
>
> Finally, an important note, you don't need to use PM domains for these
> devices at all and thus you don't need to fix what I propose. Instead
> you only have to implement the runtime PM callbacks for each driver
> and manage the clocks from there. That is probably also a easier
> solution.
But that would mean I repeat the same code in all drivers to do a
clk_get/prepare/enable/disable/unprepare of the same "core" and "iface"
clocks. I thought we have clock_ops.c just to avoid that (atleast up
until we have a better way of doing it)
And there are atleast a few architecture which have used it to avoid the
duplication across all drivers (omap1/davinci/sh/keystone)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-24 10:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-23 8:45 [RFC/RFT 0/6] qcom: Add runtime PM support Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-23 8:45 ` [RFC/RFT 1/6] PM / clock_ops: Make pm_clk_notify() do nothing in case DT passes power-domains Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-23 8:45 ` [RFC/RFT 2/6] clk: qcom: Add runtime support to handle clocks using PM clocks Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-24 10:03 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-24 10:58 ` Rajendra Nayak [this message]
2015-04-26 8:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-27 20:02 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-28 2:52 ` Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-28 7:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-29 9:49 ` Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-29 11:30 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-29 12:31 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-29 13:08 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-30 6:21 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-30 9:02 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-27 7:08 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-23 8:45 ` [RFC/RFT 3/6] serial: msm: convert driver to use runtime PM apis Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-29 0:16 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-04-29 3:15 ` Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-23 8:45 ` [RFC/RFT 4/6] mmc: sdhci-msm: " Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-23 13:21 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-23 13:42 ` Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-23 21:15 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-24 0:45 ` Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-23 13:43 ` Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-23 8:45 ` [RFC/RFT 5/6] i2c: qup: Get rid of clock handling as its done using runtime callbacks Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-23 21:16 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-24 2:32 ` Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-25 7:01 ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2015-04-27 2:36 ` Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-23 8:45 ` [RFC/RFT 6/6] spi: " Rajendra Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=553A21C7.4060506@codeaurora.org \
--to=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).