linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	ke.wang@spreadtrum.com
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com, paulus@samba.org,
	shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com, prarit@redhat.com,
	robert.schoene@tu-dresden.de, skannan@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] cpufreq: conservative: remove 'enable' field
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 16:10:56 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <557EABB8.5090700@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3af78d993ca7cea8c0b1dec4c7e4714ef21e09ce.1434019473.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

On 06/11/2015 04:21 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Conservative governor has its own 'enable' field to check in notifier if
> notification is required or not. The same functionality can now be
> achieved with 'ccdbs->enabled instead'. Lets get rid of 'enable'.

Since this is a policy wide value, is there a race possible between
switching to a new governor and checking of this value in the notifier ?
We don't want scenarios where we have switched from conservative to
ondemand and ccdbs->enabled = 1 while a parallel notifier thread is
running and thinks the conservative governor is enabled.

Regards
Preeti U Murthy
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 12 ++++++------
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c     | 13 +------------
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h     |  1 -
>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
> index 0e4154e584bf..e0b49729307d 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>  #define DEF_SAMPLING_DOWN_FACTOR		(1)
>  #define MAX_SAMPLING_DOWN_FACTOR		(10)
> 
> +static struct common_dbs_data cs_dbs_cdata;
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cs_cpu_dbs_info_s, cs_cpu_dbs_info);
> 
>  static inline unsigned int get_freq_target(struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners,
> @@ -119,13 +120,13 @@ static int dbs_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
>  	struct cpufreq_freqs *freq = data;
>  	struct cs_cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info =
>  					&per_cpu(cs_cpu_dbs_info, freq->cpu);
> -	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
> +	struct cpu_common_dbs_info *ccdbs = dbs_info->cdbs.ccdbs;
> +	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = ccdbs->policy;
> 
> -	if (!dbs_info->enable)
> +	mutex_lock(&cs_dbs_cdata.mutex);
> +	if (!ccdbs->enabled)
>  		return 0;
> 
> -	policy = dbs_info->cdbs.ccdbs->policy;
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * we only care if our internally tracked freq moves outside the 'valid'
>  	 * ranges of frequency available to us otherwise we do not change it
> @@ -133,6 +134,7 @@ static int dbs_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
>  	if (dbs_info->requested_freq > policy->max
>  			|| dbs_info->requested_freq < policy->min)
>  		dbs_info->requested_freq = freq->new;
> +	mutex_unlock(&cs_dbs_cdata.mutex);
> 
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -142,8 +144,6 @@ static struct notifier_block cs_cpufreq_notifier_block = {
>  };
> 
>  /************************** sysfs interface ************************/
> -static struct common_dbs_data cs_dbs_cdata;
> -
>  static ssize_t store_sampling_down_factor(struct dbs_data *dbs_data,
>  		const char *buf, size_t count)
>  {
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> index c26f535d3d91..7f348c3a4782 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> @@ -465,7 +465,6 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>  			cdata->get_cpu_dbs_info_s(cpu);
> 
>  		cs_dbs_info->down_skip = 0;
> -		cs_dbs_info->enable = 1;
>  		cs_dbs_info->requested_freq = policy->cur;
>  	} else {
>  		struct od_ops *od_ops = cdata->gov_ops;
> @@ -485,9 +484,7 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>  static int cpufreq_governor_stop(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>  				 struct dbs_data *dbs_data)
>  {
> -	struct common_dbs_data *cdata = dbs_data->cdata;
> -	unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu;
> -	struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = cdata->get_cpu_cdbs(cpu);
> +	struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = dbs_data->cdata->get_cpu_cdbs(policy->cpu);
>  	struct cpu_common_dbs_info *ccdbs = cdbs->ccdbs;
> 
>  	/* Shouldn't be already stopped */
> @@ -496,14 +493,6 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_stop(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> 
>  	ccdbs->enabled = false;
>  	gov_cancel_work(dbs_data, policy);
> -
> -	if (cdata->governor == GOV_CONSERVATIVE) {
> -		struct cs_cpu_dbs_info_s *cs_dbs_info =
> -			cdata->get_cpu_dbs_info_s(cpu);
> -
> -		cs_dbs_info->enable = 0;
> -	}
> -
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
> index 7da5aedb8174..7f651bdf43ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
> @@ -165,7 +165,6 @@ struct cs_cpu_dbs_info_s {
>  	struct cpu_dbs_info cdbs;
>  	unsigned int down_skip;
>  	unsigned int requested_freq;
> -	unsigned int enable:1;
>  };
> 
>  /* Per policy Governors sysfs tunables */
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-15 10:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-11 10:51 [PATCH 00/12] cpufreq: Fix governor races - part 2 Viresh Kumar
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 01/12] cpufreq: governor: Name delayed-work as dwork Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15  3:01   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 02/12] cpufreq: governor: Drop unused field 'cpu' Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15  3:12   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 03/12] cpufreq: governor: Rename 'cpu_dbs_common_info' to 'cpu_dbs_info' Viresh Kumar
2015-06-18  6:52   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 04/12] cpufreq: governor: name pointer to cpu_dbs_info as 'cdbs' Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15  4:22   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 05/12] cpufreq: governor: rename cur_policy as policy Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15  4:24   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 06/12] cpufreq: governor: Keep single copy of information common to policy->cpus Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15  6:15   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-15  6:46     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-18  5:59     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-19  4:13       ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 07/12] cpufreq: governor: split out common part of {cs|od}_dbs_timer() Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15  7:03   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 08/12] cpufreq: governor: synchronize work-handler with governor callbacks Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15  8:23   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-15  8:31     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 09/12] cpufreq: governor: Avoid invalid states with additional checks Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15  8:59   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-15  9:12     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 10/12] cpufreq: governor: Don't WARN on invalid states Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15  9:52   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 11/12] cpufreq: propagate errors returned from __cpufreq_governor() Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 10:30   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 12/12] cpufreq: conservative: remove 'enable' field Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 10:40   ` Preeti U Murthy [this message]
2015-06-15  4:49 ` [PATCH 00/12] cpufreq: Fix governor races - part 2 Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-15  5:45   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 23:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-06-16  2:10   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-18  5:19   ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=557EABB8.5090700@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ke.wang@spreadtrum.com \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robert.schoene@tu-dresden.de \
    --cc=shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=skannan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).