From: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
ke.wang@spreadtrum.com
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com, paulus@samba.org,
shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com, prarit@redhat.com,
robert.schoene@tu-dresden.de, skannan@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] cpufreq: conservative: remove 'enable' field
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 16:10:56 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <557EABB8.5090700@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3af78d993ca7cea8c0b1dec4c7e4714ef21e09ce.1434019473.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
On 06/11/2015 04:21 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Conservative governor has its own 'enable' field to check in notifier if
> notification is required or not. The same functionality can now be
> achieved with 'ccdbs->enabled instead'. Lets get rid of 'enable'.
Since this is a policy wide value, is there a race possible between
switching to a new governor and checking of this value in the notifier ?
We don't want scenarios where we have switched from conservative to
ondemand and ccdbs->enabled = 1 while a parallel notifier thread is
running and thinks the conservative governor is enabled.
Regards
Preeti U Murthy
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 12 ++++++------
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 13 +------------
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h | 1 -
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
> index 0e4154e584bf..e0b49729307d 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> #define DEF_SAMPLING_DOWN_FACTOR (1)
> #define MAX_SAMPLING_DOWN_FACTOR (10)
>
> +static struct common_dbs_data cs_dbs_cdata;
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cs_cpu_dbs_info_s, cs_cpu_dbs_info);
>
> static inline unsigned int get_freq_target(struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners,
> @@ -119,13 +120,13 @@ static int dbs_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
> struct cpufreq_freqs *freq = data;
> struct cs_cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info =
> &per_cpu(cs_cpu_dbs_info, freq->cpu);
> - struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
> + struct cpu_common_dbs_info *ccdbs = dbs_info->cdbs.ccdbs;
> + struct cpufreq_policy *policy = ccdbs->policy;
>
> - if (!dbs_info->enable)
> + mutex_lock(&cs_dbs_cdata.mutex);
> + if (!ccdbs->enabled)
> return 0;
>
> - policy = dbs_info->cdbs.ccdbs->policy;
> -
> /*
> * we only care if our internally tracked freq moves outside the 'valid'
> * ranges of frequency available to us otherwise we do not change it
> @@ -133,6 +134,7 @@ static int dbs_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
> if (dbs_info->requested_freq > policy->max
> || dbs_info->requested_freq < policy->min)
> dbs_info->requested_freq = freq->new;
> + mutex_unlock(&cs_dbs_cdata.mutex);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -142,8 +144,6 @@ static struct notifier_block cs_cpufreq_notifier_block = {
> };
>
> /************************** sysfs interface ************************/
> -static struct common_dbs_data cs_dbs_cdata;
> -
> static ssize_t store_sampling_down_factor(struct dbs_data *dbs_data,
> const char *buf, size_t count)
> {
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> index c26f535d3d91..7f348c3a4782 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> @@ -465,7 +465,6 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> cdata->get_cpu_dbs_info_s(cpu);
>
> cs_dbs_info->down_skip = 0;
> - cs_dbs_info->enable = 1;
> cs_dbs_info->requested_freq = policy->cur;
> } else {
> struct od_ops *od_ops = cdata->gov_ops;
> @@ -485,9 +484,7 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> static int cpufreq_governor_stop(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> struct dbs_data *dbs_data)
> {
> - struct common_dbs_data *cdata = dbs_data->cdata;
> - unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu;
> - struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = cdata->get_cpu_cdbs(cpu);
> + struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = dbs_data->cdata->get_cpu_cdbs(policy->cpu);
> struct cpu_common_dbs_info *ccdbs = cdbs->ccdbs;
>
> /* Shouldn't be already stopped */
> @@ -496,14 +493,6 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_stop(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>
> ccdbs->enabled = false;
> gov_cancel_work(dbs_data, policy);
> -
> - if (cdata->governor == GOV_CONSERVATIVE) {
> - struct cs_cpu_dbs_info_s *cs_dbs_info =
> - cdata->get_cpu_dbs_info_s(cpu);
> -
> - cs_dbs_info->enable = 0;
> - }
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
> index 7da5aedb8174..7f651bdf43ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
> @@ -165,7 +165,6 @@ struct cs_cpu_dbs_info_s {
> struct cpu_dbs_info cdbs;
> unsigned int down_skip;
> unsigned int requested_freq;
> - unsigned int enable:1;
> };
>
> /* Per policy Governors sysfs tunables */
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-15 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-11 10:51 [PATCH 00/12] cpufreq: Fix governor races - part 2 Viresh Kumar
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 01/12] cpufreq: governor: Name delayed-work as dwork Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 3:01 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 02/12] cpufreq: governor: Drop unused field 'cpu' Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 3:12 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 03/12] cpufreq: governor: Rename 'cpu_dbs_common_info' to 'cpu_dbs_info' Viresh Kumar
2015-06-18 6:52 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 04/12] cpufreq: governor: name pointer to cpu_dbs_info as 'cdbs' Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 4:22 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 05/12] cpufreq: governor: rename cur_policy as policy Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 4:24 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 06/12] cpufreq: governor: Keep single copy of information common to policy->cpus Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 6:15 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-15 6:46 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-18 5:59 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-19 4:13 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 07/12] cpufreq: governor: split out common part of {cs|od}_dbs_timer() Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 7:03 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 08/12] cpufreq: governor: synchronize work-handler with governor callbacks Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 8:23 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-15 8:31 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 09/12] cpufreq: governor: Avoid invalid states with additional checks Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 8:59 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-15 9:12 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 10/12] cpufreq: governor: Don't WARN on invalid states Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 9:52 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 11/12] cpufreq: propagate errors returned from __cpufreq_governor() Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 10:30 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 12/12] cpufreq: conservative: remove 'enable' field Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 10:40 ` Preeti U Murthy [this message]
2015-06-15 4:49 ` [PATCH 00/12] cpufreq: Fix governor races - part 2 Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-15 5:45 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 23:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-06-16 2:10 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-18 5:19 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=557EABB8.5090700@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ke.wang@spreadtrum.com \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robert.schoene@tu-dresden.de \
--cc=shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=skannan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).