linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	ke.wang@spreadtrum.com, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	paulus@samba.org, shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	prarit@redhat.com, robert.schoene@tu-dresden.de,
	skannan@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] cpufreq: governor: Keep single copy of information common to policy->cpus
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 09:43:24 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <558396E4.5040004@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150618055941.GA3410@linux>

On 06/18/2015 11:29 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 13:09:45 +0530
> Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: governor: Keep single copy of information common to
>  policy->cpus
> 
> Some information is common to all CPUs belonging to a policy, but are
> kept on per-cpu basis. Lets keep that in another structure common to all
> policy->cpus. That will make updates/reads to that less complex and less
> error prone.
> 
> The memory for ccdbs is allocated/freed at INIT/EXIT, so that it we
> don't reallocate it for STOP/START sequence. It will be also be used (in
> next patch) while the governor is stopped and so must not be freed that
> early.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Reviewed-by: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 18 ++++---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c     | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h     | 24 +++++----
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c     | 38 +++++++-------
>  4 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
> index af47d322679e..5b5c01ca556c 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static inline unsigned int get_freq_target(struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners,
>  static void cs_check_cpu(int cpu, unsigned int load)
>  {
>  	struct cs_cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info = &per_cpu(cs_cpu_dbs_info, cpu);
> -	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = dbs_info->cdbs.policy;
> +	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = dbs_info->cdbs.ccdbs->policy;
>  	struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
>  	struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
> 
> @@ -106,22 +106,24 @@ static void cs_dbs_timer(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>  	struct cs_cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info = container_of(work,
>  			struct cs_cpu_dbs_info_s, cdbs.dwork.work);
> -	unsigned int cpu = dbs_info->cdbs.policy->cpu;
> +	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = dbs_info->cdbs.ccdbs->policy;
> +	unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu;
>  	struct cs_cpu_dbs_info_s *core_dbs_info = &per_cpu(cs_cpu_dbs_info,
>  			cpu);
> -	struct dbs_data *dbs_data = dbs_info->cdbs.policy->governor_data;
> +	struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
>  	struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
>  	int delay = delay_for_sampling_rate(cs_tuners->sampling_rate);
>  	bool modify_all = true;
> 
> -	mutex_lock(&core_dbs_info->cdbs.timer_mutex);
> -	if (!need_load_eval(&core_dbs_info->cdbs, cs_tuners->sampling_rate))
> +	mutex_lock(&core_dbs_info->cdbs.ccdbs->timer_mutex);
> +	if (!need_load_eval(core_dbs_info->cdbs.ccdbs,
> +			    cs_tuners->sampling_rate))
>  		modify_all = false;
>  	else
>  		dbs_check_cpu(dbs_data, cpu);
> 
> -	gov_queue_work(dbs_data, dbs_info->cdbs.policy, delay, modify_all);
> -	mutex_unlock(&core_dbs_info->cdbs.timer_mutex);
> +	gov_queue_work(dbs_data, policy, delay, modify_all);
> +	mutex_unlock(&core_dbs_info->cdbs.ccdbs->timer_mutex);
>  }
> 
>  static int dbs_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
> @@ -135,7 +137,7 @@ static int dbs_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
>  	if (!dbs_info->enable)
>  		return 0;
> 
> -	policy = dbs_info->cdbs.policy;
> +	policy = dbs_info->cdbs.ccdbs->policy;
> 
>  	/*
>  	 * we only care if our internally tracked freq moves outside the 'valid'
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> index c0566f86caed..72a92fa71ba5 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ void dbs_check_cpu(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, int cpu)
>  	struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = dbs_data->cdata->get_cpu_cdbs(cpu);
>  	struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
>  	struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
> -	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
> +	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cdbs->ccdbs->policy;
>  	unsigned int sampling_rate;
>  	unsigned int max_load = 0;
>  	unsigned int ignore_nice;
> @@ -60,8 +60,6 @@ void dbs_check_cpu(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, int cpu)
>  		ignore_nice = cs_tuners->ignore_nice_load;
>  	}
> 
> -	policy = cdbs->policy;
> -
>  	/* Get Absolute Load */
>  	for_each_cpu(j, policy->cpus) {
>  		struct cpu_dbs_info *j_cdbs;
> @@ -209,17 +207,18 @@ static inline void gov_cancel_work(struct dbs_data *dbs_data,
>  }
> 
>  /* Will return if we need to evaluate cpu load again or not */
> -bool need_load_eval(struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs, unsigned int sampling_rate)
> +bool need_load_eval(struct cpu_common_dbs_info *ccdbs,
> +		    unsigned int sampling_rate)
>  {
> -	if (policy_is_shared(cdbs->policy)) {
> +	if (policy_is_shared(ccdbs->policy)) {
>  		ktime_t time_now = ktime_get();
> -		s64 delta_us = ktime_us_delta(time_now, cdbs->time_stamp);
> +		s64 delta_us = ktime_us_delta(time_now, ccdbs->time_stamp);
> 
>  		/* Do nothing if we recently have sampled */
>  		if (delta_us < (s64)(sampling_rate / 2))
>  			return false;
>  		else
> -			cdbs->time_stamp = time_now;
> +			ccdbs->time_stamp = time_now;
>  	}
> 
>  	return true;
> @@ -238,6 +237,37 @@ static void set_sampling_rate(struct dbs_data *dbs_data,
>  	}
>  }
> 
> +static int alloc_ccdbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> +		       struct common_dbs_data *cdata)
> +{
> +	struct cpu_common_dbs_info *ccdbs;
> +	int j;
> +
> +	/* Allocate memory for the common information for policy->cpus */
> +	ccdbs = kzalloc(sizeof(*ccdbs), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!ccdbs)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	/* Set ccdbs for all CPUs, online+offline */
> +	for_each_cpu(j, policy->related_cpus)
> +		cdata->get_cpu_cdbs(j)->ccdbs = ccdbs;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void free_ccdbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> +		       struct common_dbs_data *cdata)
> +{
> +	struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = cdata->get_cpu_cdbs(policy->cpu);
> +	struct cpu_common_dbs_info *ccdbs = cdbs->ccdbs;
> +	int j;
> +
> +	for_each_cpu(j, policy->cpus)
> +		cdata->get_cpu_cdbs(j)->ccdbs = NULL;
> +
> +	kfree(ccdbs);
> +}
> +
>  static int cpufreq_governor_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>  				 struct dbs_data *dbs_data,
>  				 struct common_dbs_data *cdata)
> @@ -248,6 +278,11 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>  	if (dbs_data) {
>  		if (WARN_ON(have_governor_per_policy()))
>  			return -EINVAL;
> +
> +		ret = alloc_ccdbs(policy, cdata);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +
>  		dbs_data->usage_count++;
>  		policy->governor_data = dbs_data;
>  		return 0;
> @@ -257,12 +292,16 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>  	if (!dbs_data)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> 
> +	ret = alloc_ccdbs(policy, cdata);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto free_dbs_data;
> +
>  	dbs_data->cdata = cdata;
>  	dbs_data->usage_count = 1;
> 
>  	ret = cdata->init(dbs_data, !policy->governor->initialized);
>  	if (ret)
> -		goto free_dbs_data;
> +		goto free_ccdbs;
> 
>  	/* policy latency is in ns. Convert it to us first */
>  	latency = policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency / 1000;
> @@ -299,6 +338,8 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>  	}
>  cdata_exit:
>  	cdata->exit(dbs_data, !policy->governor->initialized);
> +free_ccdbs:
> +	free_ccdbs(policy, cdata);
>  free_dbs_data:
>  	kfree(dbs_data);
>  	return ret;
> @@ -322,6 +363,8 @@ static void cpufreq_governor_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>  		cdata->exit(dbs_data, policy->governor->initialized == 1);
>  		kfree(dbs_data);
>  	}
> +
> +	free_ccdbs(policy, cdata);
>  }
> 
>  static int cpufreq_governor_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> @@ -330,6 +373,7 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>  	struct common_dbs_data *cdata = dbs_data->cdata;
>  	unsigned int sampling_rate, ignore_nice, j, cpu = policy->cpu;
>  	struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = cdata->get_cpu_cdbs(cpu);
> +	struct cpu_common_dbs_info *ccdbs = cdbs->ccdbs;
>  	int io_busy = 0;
> 
>  	if (!policy->cur)
> @@ -348,11 +392,14 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>  		io_busy = od_tuners->io_is_busy;
>  	}
> 
> +	ccdbs->policy = policy;
> +	ccdbs->time_stamp = ktime_get();
> +	mutex_init(&ccdbs->timer_mutex);
> +
>  	for_each_cpu(j, policy->cpus) {
>  		struct cpu_dbs_info *j_cdbs = cdata->get_cpu_cdbs(j);
>  		unsigned int prev_load;
> 
> -		j_cdbs->policy = policy;
>  		j_cdbs->prev_cpu_idle =
>  			get_cpu_idle_time(j, &j_cdbs->prev_cpu_wall, io_busy);
> 
> @@ -364,7 +411,6 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>  		if (ignore_nice)
>  			j_cdbs->prev_cpu_nice = kcpustat_cpu(j).cpustat[CPUTIME_NICE];
> 
> -		mutex_init(&j_cdbs->timer_mutex);
>  		INIT_DEFERRABLE_WORK(&j_cdbs->dwork, cdata->gov_dbs_timer);
>  	}
> 
> @@ -384,9 +430,6 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>  		od_ops->powersave_bias_init_cpu(cpu);
>  	}
> 
> -	/* Initiate timer time stamp */
> -	cdbs->time_stamp = ktime_get();
> -
>  	gov_queue_work(dbs_data, policy, delay_for_sampling_rate(sampling_rate),
>  		       true);
>  	return 0;
> @@ -398,6 +441,9 @@ static void cpufreq_governor_stop(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>  	struct common_dbs_data *cdata = dbs_data->cdata;
>  	unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu;
>  	struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = cdata->get_cpu_cdbs(cpu);
> +	struct cpu_common_dbs_info *ccdbs = cdbs->ccdbs;
> +
> +	gov_cancel_work(dbs_data, policy);
> 
>  	if (cdata->governor == GOV_CONSERVATIVE) {
>  		struct cs_cpu_dbs_info_s *cs_dbs_info =
> @@ -406,10 +452,8 @@ static void cpufreq_governor_stop(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>  		cs_dbs_info->enable = 0;
>  	}
> 
> -	gov_cancel_work(dbs_data, policy);
> -
> -	mutex_destroy(&cdbs->timer_mutex);
> -	cdbs->policy = NULL;
> +	ccdbs->policy = NULL;
> +	mutex_destroy(&ccdbs->timer_mutex);
>  }
> 
>  static void cpufreq_governor_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> @@ -419,18 +463,18 @@ static void cpufreq_governor_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>  	unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu;
>  	struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = cdata->get_cpu_cdbs(cpu);
> 
> -	if (!cdbs->policy)
> +	if (!cdbs->ccdbs || !cdbs->ccdbs->policy)
>  		return;
> 
> -	mutex_lock(&cdbs->timer_mutex);
> -	if (policy->max < cdbs->policy->cur)
> -		__cpufreq_driver_target(cdbs->policy, policy->max,
> +	mutex_lock(&cdbs->ccdbs->timer_mutex);
> +	if (policy->max < cdbs->ccdbs->policy->cur)
> +		__cpufreq_driver_target(cdbs->ccdbs->policy, policy->max,
>  					CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
> -	else if (policy->min > cdbs->policy->cur)
> -		__cpufreq_driver_target(cdbs->policy, policy->min,
> +	else if (policy->min > cdbs->ccdbs->policy->cur)
> +		__cpufreq_driver_target(cdbs->ccdbs->policy, policy->min,
>  					CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
>  	dbs_check_cpu(dbs_data, cpu);
> -	mutex_unlock(&cdbs->timer_mutex);
> +	mutex_unlock(&cdbs->ccdbs->timer_mutex);
>  }
> 
>  int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
> index a0f8eb79ee6d..153412cafb05 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
> @@ -128,6 +128,18 @@ static void *get_cpu_dbs_info_s(int cpu)				\
>   * cs_*: Conservative governor
>   */
> 
> +/* Common to all CPUs of a policy */
> +struct cpu_common_dbs_info {
> +	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
> +	/*
> +	 * percpu mutex that serializes governor limit change with gov_dbs_timer
> +	 * invocation. We do not want gov_dbs_timer to run when user is changing
> +	 * the governor or limits.
> +	 */
> +	struct mutex timer_mutex;
> +	ktime_t time_stamp;
> +};
> +
>  /* Per cpu structures */
>  struct cpu_dbs_info {
>  	u64 prev_cpu_idle;
> @@ -140,15 +152,8 @@ struct cpu_dbs_info {
>  	 * wake-up from idle.
>  	 */
>  	unsigned int prev_load;
> -	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
>  	struct delayed_work dwork;
> -	/*
> -	 * percpu mutex that serializes governor limit change with gov_dbs_timer
> -	 * invocation. We do not want gov_dbs_timer to run when user is changing
> -	 * the governor or limits.
> -	 */
> -	struct mutex timer_mutex;
> -	ktime_t time_stamp;
> +	struct cpu_common_dbs_info *ccdbs;
>  };
> 
>  struct od_cpu_dbs_info_s {
> @@ -264,7 +269,8 @@ static ssize_t show_sampling_rate_min_gov_pol				\
>  extern struct mutex cpufreq_governor_lock;
> 
>  void dbs_check_cpu(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, int cpu);
> -bool need_load_eval(struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs, unsigned int sampling_rate);
> +bool need_load_eval(struct cpu_common_dbs_info *ccdbs,
> +		    unsigned int sampling_rate);
>  int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>  		struct common_dbs_data *cdata, unsigned int event);
>  void gov_queue_work(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
> index d29c6f9c6e3e..651677cfa581 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
> @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ static void dbs_freq_increase(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int freq)
>  static void od_check_cpu(int cpu, unsigned int load)
>  {
>  	struct od_cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info = &per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info, cpu);
> -	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = dbs_info->cdbs.policy;
> +	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = dbs_info->cdbs.ccdbs->policy;
>  	struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
>  	struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
> 
> @@ -195,16 +195,18 @@ static void od_dbs_timer(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>  	struct od_cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info =
>  		container_of(work, struct od_cpu_dbs_info_s, cdbs.dwork.work);
> -	unsigned int cpu = dbs_info->cdbs.policy->cpu;
> +	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = dbs_info->cdbs.ccdbs->policy;
> +	unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu;
>  	struct od_cpu_dbs_info_s *core_dbs_info = &per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info,
>  			cpu);
> -	struct dbs_data *dbs_data = dbs_info->cdbs.policy->governor_data;
> +	struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
>  	struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
>  	int delay = 0, sample_type = core_dbs_info->sample_type;
>  	bool modify_all = true;
> 
> -	mutex_lock(&core_dbs_info->cdbs.timer_mutex);
> -	if (!need_load_eval(&core_dbs_info->cdbs, od_tuners->sampling_rate)) {
> +	mutex_lock(&core_dbs_info->cdbs.ccdbs->timer_mutex);
> +	if (!need_load_eval(core_dbs_info->cdbs.ccdbs,
> +			    od_tuners->sampling_rate)) {
>  		modify_all = false;
>  		goto max_delay;
>  	}
> @@ -213,8 +215,7 @@ static void od_dbs_timer(struct work_struct *work)
>  	core_dbs_info->sample_type = OD_NORMAL_SAMPLE;
>  	if (sample_type == OD_SUB_SAMPLE) {
>  		delay = core_dbs_info->freq_lo_jiffies;
> -		__cpufreq_driver_target(core_dbs_info->cdbs.policy,
> -					core_dbs_info->freq_lo,
> +		__cpufreq_driver_target(policy, core_dbs_info->freq_lo,
>  					CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
>  	} else {
>  		dbs_check_cpu(dbs_data, cpu);
> @@ -230,8 +231,8 @@ static void od_dbs_timer(struct work_struct *work)
>  		delay = delay_for_sampling_rate(od_tuners->sampling_rate
>  				* core_dbs_info->rate_mult);
> 
> -	gov_queue_work(dbs_data, dbs_info->cdbs.policy, delay, modify_all);
> -	mutex_unlock(&core_dbs_info->cdbs.timer_mutex);
> +	gov_queue_work(dbs_data, policy, delay, modify_all);
> +	mutex_unlock(&core_dbs_info->cdbs.ccdbs->timer_mutex);
>  }
> 
>  /************************** sysfs interface ************************/
> @@ -274,10 +275,10 @@ static void update_sampling_rate(struct dbs_data *dbs_data,
>  		dbs_info = &per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info, cpu);
>  		cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
> 
> -		mutex_lock(&dbs_info->cdbs.timer_mutex);
> +		mutex_lock(&dbs_info->cdbs.ccdbs->timer_mutex);
> 
>  		if (!delayed_work_pending(&dbs_info->cdbs.dwork)) {
> -			mutex_unlock(&dbs_info->cdbs.timer_mutex);
> +			mutex_unlock(&dbs_info->cdbs.ccdbs->timer_mutex);
>  			continue;
>  		}
> 
> @@ -286,15 +287,15 @@ static void update_sampling_rate(struct dbs_data *dbs_data,
> 
>  		if (time_before(next_sampling, appointed_at)) {
> 
> -			mutex_unlock(&dbs_info->cdbs.timer_mutex);
> +			mutex_unlock(&dbs_info->cdbs.ccdbs->timer_mutex);
>  			cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dbs_info->cdbs.dwork);
> -			mutex_lock(&dbs_info->cdbs.timer_mutex);
> +			mutex_lock(&dbs_info->cdbs.ccdbs->timer_mutex);
> 
> -			gov_queue_work(dbs_data, dbs_info->cdbs.policy,
> +			gov_queue_work(dbs_data, policy,
>  				       usecs_to_jiffies(new_rate), true);
> 
>  		}
> -		mutex_unlock(&dbs_info->cdbs.timer_mutex);
> +		mutex_unlock(&dbs_info->cdbs.ccdbs->timer_mutex);
>  	}
>  }
> 
> @@ -557,13 +558,16 @@ static void od_set_powersave_bias(unsigned int powersave_bias)
> 
>  	get_online_cpus();
>  	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> +		struct cpu_common_dbs_info *ccdbs;
> +
>  		if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &done))
>  			continue;
> 
> -		policy = per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info, cpu).cdbs.policy;
> -		if (!policy)
> +		ccdbs = per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info, cpu).cdbs.ccdbs;
> +		if (!ccdbs)
>  			continue;
> 
> +		policy = ccdbs->policy;
>  		cpumask_or(&done, &done, policy->cpus);
> 
>  		if (policy->governor != &cpufreq_gov_ondemand)
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-19  4:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-11 10:51 [PATCH 00/12] cpufreq: Fix governor races - part 2 Viresh Kumar
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 01/12] cpufreq: governor: Name delayed-work as dwork Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15  3:01   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 02/12] cpufreq: governor: Drop unused field 'cpu' Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15  3:12   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 03/12] cpufreq: governor: Rename 'cpu_dbs_common_info' to 'cpu_dbs_info' Viresh Kumar
2015-06-18  6:52   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 04/12] cpufreq: governor: name pointer to cpu_dbs_info as 'cdbs' Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15  4:22   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 05/12] cpufreq: governor: rename cur_policy as policy Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15  4:24   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 06/12] cpufreq: governor: Keep single copy of information common to policy->cpus Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15  6:15   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-15  6:46     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-18  5:59     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-19  4:13       ` Preeti U Murthy [this message]
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 07/12] cpufreq: governor: split out common part of {cs|od}_dbs_timer() Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15  7:03   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 08/12] cpufreq: governor: synchronize work-handler with governor callbacks Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15  8:23   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-15  8:31     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 09/12] cpufreq: governor: Avoid invalid states with additional checks Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15  8:59   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-15  9:12     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 10/12] cpufreq: governor: Don't WARN on invalid states Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15  9:52   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 11/12] cpufreq: propagate errors returned from __cpufreq_governor() Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 10:30   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 12/12] cpufreq: conservative: remove 'enable' field Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 10:40   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-15  4:49 ` [PATCH 00/12] cpufreq: Fix governor races - part 2 Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-15  5:45   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 23:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-06-16  2:10   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-18  5:19   ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=558396E4.5040004@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ke.wang@spreadtrum.com \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robert.schoene@tu-dresden.de \
    --cc=shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=skannan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).