linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "SungEun Kim(cleaneye.kim@lge.com)" <cleaneye.kim@lge.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: pavel@ucw.cz, len.brown@intel.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v2] PM / Sleep: Use workqueue for user space wakeup sources garbage collector
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 14:03:05 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55961789.5090709@lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1544571.4tSqBEqESU@vostro.rjw.lan>

On 2015-07-03 오전 9:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 01, 2015 05:28:48 PM SungEun Kim wrote:
>> From: "SungEun Kim" <cleaneye.kim@lge.com>
>>
>> The synchronous synchronize_rcu in wakeup_source_remove makes user
> process
>> which writes to /sys/kernel/wake_unlock blocked sometimes.
>>
>> For example, when android eventhub tries to release wakelock,
>> this blocking process can occur, and eventhub can't get input event
>> for a while.
>>
>> Using workqueue instead of direct function call at pm_wake_unlock
>> can prevent this unnecessary delay of an user space process.
> 
> The idea is defendable, but the patch is too simple.
> 
> For example, if the garbage collection is in progress, it is not useful
> to start a new one.
> 
> Also the incrementation and clearing of wakelocks_gc_count should be under
> the lock.

Thank you for your advices.
I will correct and amend my patch and then submit v3 patch.

Thank you.
SungEun Kim

> 
> 
> -- 
> I speak only for myself.
> Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-03  5:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-01  2:48 [PATCH] PM / Sleep: Use workqueue for user space wakeup sources garbage collector SungEun Kim
2015-07-01  3:51 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-01  7:25   ` SungEun Kim(cleaneye.kim@lge.com)
2015-07-01  3:54 ` Krzysztof Kozłowski
2015-07-01  8:28 ` [PATCH v2] " SungEun Kim
2015-07-03  0:15   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-03  5:03     ` SungEun Kim(cleaneye.kim@lge.com) [this message]
2015-07-15  3:35       ` SungEun Kim(cleaneye.kim@lge.com)
2015-07-03  6:57   ` [PATCH v3] " SungEun Kim
2015-07-16  0:29     ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55961789.5090709@lge.com \
    --to=cleaneye.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).