From: Pan Xinhui <xinhuix.pan@intel.com>
To: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
"mnipxh@163.com" <mnipxh@163.com>,
"yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] acpi-cpufreq: use same acpi_cpufreq_data if policy is shared
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 16:01:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5596414C.4090106@intel.com> (raw)
cpufreq core will mark all cpus in policy->cpus as initialized
by setting percpu cpufreq_cpu_data = policy.
However in acpi-cpufreq, we did not set percpu acpi_cpufreq_data for
all cpus in policy->cpus.
That will cause a issue that when we call get_cur_freq_on_cpu for a
cpu, it returns zero instead of a correct value.
So we shared acpi_cpufreq_data for all those cpus in policy->cpus.
Signed-off-by: xinhuix.pan <xinhuix.pan@intel.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
index 0136dfc..6c6dc97 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -673,6 +673,7 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
}
data->acpi_data = per_cpu_ptr(acpi_perf_data, cpu);
+ cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, cpumask_of(cpu));
per_cpu(acfreq_data, cpu) = data;
if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC))
@@ -712,6 +713,10 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
}
#endif
+ for_each_cpu(i, policy->cpus) {
+ per_cpu(acfreq_data, i) = data;
+ }
+
/* capability check */
if (perf->state_count <= 1) {
pr_debug("No P-States\n");
@@ -843,7 +848,9 @@ err_free_mask:
free_cpumask_var(data->freqdomain_cpus);
err_free:
kfree(data);
- per_cpu(acfreq_data, cpu) = NULL;
+ for_each_cpu(i, policy->cpus) {
+ per_cpu(acfreq_data, i) = NULL;
+ }
return result;
}
@@ -851,11 +858,14 @@ err_free:
static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = per_cpu(acfreq_data, policy->cpu);
+ int i;
pr_debug("acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit\n");
if (data) {
- per_cpu(acfreq_data, policy->cpu) = NULL;
+ for_each_cpu(i, policy->cpus) {
+ per_cpu(acfreq_data, i) = NULL;
+ }
acpi_processor_unregister_performance(data->acpi_data,
policy->cpu);
free_cpumask_var(data->freqdomain_cpus);
--
1.9.1
next reply other threads:[~2015-07-03 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-03 8:01 Pan Xinhui [this message]
2015-07-03 8:46 ` [PATCH] acpi-cpufreq: use same acpi_cpufreq_data if policy is shared Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5596414C.4090106@intel.com \
--to=xinhuix.pan@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mnipxh@163.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).