* [PATCH] acpi-cpufreq: replace per_cpu with driver_data of policy
@ 2015-07-07 10:29 Pan Xinhui
2015-07-07 10:45 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Pan Xinhui @ 2015-07-07 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm
Cc: rjw, viresh.kumar, mnipxh@163.com, yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com
Now policy has field of driver_data, we can use it to get rid of per_cpu
acpi_cpufreq_data.
we have benefits after this replacing. 1) memory saving. 2) policy is
shared by several cpus, per_cpu seems not correct. useing *driver_data*
is more reasonable. 3) fix a memory leak in acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit. as
policy->cpu might change after cpu hotplug. So sometimes we cant't free
*data*, use *driver_data* to fix it. 4) fix a zero return value of
get_cur_freq_on_cpu. Only per_cpu(policy->cpu) is set to *data*, if we
try to get cpufreq on other cpus, we get zero instead of correct values.
Use *driver_data* to fix it.
Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhuix.pan@intel.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
index 0136dfc..7f662dd 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -72,8 +72,6 @@ struct acpi_cpufreq_data {
cpumask_var_t freqdomain_cpus;
};
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct acpi_cpufreq_data *, acfreq_data);
-
/* acpi_perf_data is a pointer to percpu data. */
static struct acpi_processor_performance __percpu *acpi_perf_data;
@@ -144,7 +142,7 @@ static int _store_boost(int val)
static ssize_t show_freqdomain_cpus(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf)
{
- struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = per_cpu(acfreq_data, policy->cpu);
+ struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = policy->driver_data;
return cpufreq_show_cpus(data->freqdomain_cpus, buf);
}
@@ -327,7 +325,8 @@ static void drv_write(struct drv_cmd *cmd)
put_cpu();
}
-static u32 get_cur_val(const struct cpumask *mask)
+static u32 get_cur_val(const struct cpumask *mask,
+ struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data)
{
struct acpi_processor_performance *perf;
struct drv_cmd cmd;
@@ -335,7 +334,7 @@ static u32 get_cur_val(const struct cpumask *mask)
if (unlikely(cpumask_empty(mask)))
return 0;
- switch (per_cpu(acfreq_data, cpumask_first(mask))->cpu_feature) {
+ switch (data->cpu_feature) {
case SYSTEM_INTEL_MSR_CAPABLE:
cmd.type = SYSTEM_INTEL_MSR_CAPABLE;
cmd.addr.msr.reg = MSR_IA32_PERF_CTL;
@@ -346,7 +345,7 @@ static u32 get_cur_val(const struct cpumask *mask)
break;
case SYSTEM_IO_CAPABLE:
cmd.type = SYSTEM_IO_CAPABLE;
- perf = per_cpu(acfreq_data, cpumask_first(mask))->acpi_data;
+ perf = data->acpi_data;
cmd.addr.io.port = perf->control_register.address;
cmd.addr.io.bit_width = perf->control_register.bit_width;
break;
@@ -364,19 +363,26 @@ static u32 get_cur_val(const struct cpumask *mask)
static unsigned int get_cur_freq_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
{
- struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = per_cpu(acfreq_data, cpu);
+ struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data;
+ struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
unsigned int freq;
unsigned int cached_freq;
pr_debug("get_cur_freq_on_cpu (%d)\n", cpu);
+ policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
+ if (unlikely(!policy))
+ return 0;
+
+ data = policy->driver_data;
if (unlikely(data == NULL ||
data->acpi_data == NULL || data->freq_table == NULL)) {
+ cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
return 0;
}
cached_freq = data->freq_table[data->acpi_data->state].frequency;
- freq = extract_freq(get_cur_val(cpumask_of(cpu)), data);
+ freq = extract_freq(get_cur_val(cpumask_of(cpu), data), data);
if (freq != cached_freq) {
/*
* The dreaded BIOS frequency change behind our back.
@@ -385,6 +391,8 @@ static unsigned int get_cur_freq_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
data->resume = 1;
}
+ cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
+
pr_debug("cur freq = %u\n", freq);
return freq;
@@ -397,7 +405,7 @@ static unsigned int check_freqs(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int freq,
unsigned int i;
for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
- cur_freq = extract_freq(get_cur_val(mask), data);
+ cur_freq = extract_freq(get_cur_val(mask, data), data);
if (cur_freq == freq)
return 1;
udelay(10);
@@ -408,7 +416,7 @@ static unsigned int check_freqs(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int freq,
static int acpi_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int index)
{
- struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = per_cpu(acfreq_data, policy->cpu);
+ struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = policy->driver_data;
struct acpi_processor_performance *perf;
struct drv_cmd cmd;
unsigned int next_perf_state = 0; /* Index into perf table */
@@ -673,7 +681,7 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
}
data->acpi_data = per_cpu_ptr(acpi_perf_data, cpu);
- per_cpu(acfreq_data, cpu) = data;
+ policy->driver_data = data;
if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC))
acpi_cpufreq_driver.flags |= CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS;
@@ -843,19 +851,19 @@ err_free_mask:
free_cpumask_var(data->freqdomain_cpus);
err_free:
kfree(data);
- per_cpu(acfreq_data, cpu) = NULL;
+ policy->driver_data = NULL;
return result;
}
static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
- struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = per_cpu(acfreq_data, policy->cpu);
+ struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = policy->driver_data;
pr_debug("acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit\n");
if (data) {
- per_cpu(acfreq_data, policy->cpu) = NULL;
+ policy->driver_data = NULL;
acpi_processor_unregister_performance(data->acpi_data,
policy->cpu);
free_cpumask_var(data->freqdomain_cpus);
@@ -868,7 +876,7 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
static int acpi_cpufreq_resume(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
- struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = per_cpu(acfreq_data, policy->cpu);
+ struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = policy->driver_data;
pr_debug("acpi_cpufreq_resume\n");
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] acpi-cpufreq: replace per_cpu with driver_data of policy
2015-07-07 10:29 [PATCH] acpi-cpufreq: replace per_cpu with driver_data of policy Pan Xinhui
@ 2015-07-07 10:45 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-07 12:02 ` Pan Xinhui
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2015-07-07 10:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pan Xinhui
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm, rjw, mnipxh@163.com,
yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com
On 07-07-15, 18:29, Pan Xinhui wrote:
>
> Now policy has field of driver_data, we can use it to get rid of per_cpu
> acpi_cpufreq_data.
Instead:
"Drivers can store their internal per-policy information in
policy->driver_data, lets use it."
> we have benefits after this replacing. 1) memory saving. 2) policy is
s/we/We
Also these points can be kept in separate lines :)
> shared by several cpus, per_cpu seems not correct. useing *driver_data*
using
> is more reasonable. 3) fix a memory leak in acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit.
Not just that. You are also fixing NULL pointer dereferences if wrong
or uninitialized per-cpu data is used, because of a recent hotplug of
policy->cpu.
> as
> policy->cpu might change after cpu hotplug. So sometimes we cant't free
> *data*, use *driver_data* to fix it. 4) fix a zero return value of
> get_cur_freq_on_cpu. Only per_cpu(policy->cpu) is set to *data*, if we
> try to get cpufreq on other cpus, we get zero instead of correct values.
> Use *driver_data* to fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhuix.pan@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> index 0136dfc..7f662dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> @@ -72,8 +72,6 @@ struct acpi_cpufreq_data {
> cpumask_var_t freqdomain_cpus;
> };
>
> -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct acpi_cpufreq_data *, acfreq_data);
> -
> /* acpi_perf_data is a pointer to percpu data. */
> static struct acpi_processor_performance __percpu *acpi_perf_data;
>
> @@ -144,7 +142,7 @@ static int _store_boost(int val)
>
> static ssize_t show_freqdomain_cpus(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf)
> {
> - struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = per_cpu(acfreq_data, policy->cpu);
> + struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = policy->driver_data;
>
> return cpufreq_show_cpus(data->freqdomain_cpus, buf);
> }
> @@ -327,7 +325,8 @@ static void drv_write(struct drv_cmd *cmd)
> put_cpu();
> }
>
> -static u32 get_cur_val(const struct cpumask *mask)
> +static u32 get_cur_val(const struct cpumask *mask,
> + struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data)
Run checkpatch --strict to see some alignment warnings here..
> {
> struct acpi_processor_performance *perf;
> struct drv_cmd cmd;
> @@ -335,7 +334,7 @@ static u32 get_cur_val(const struct cpumask *mask)
> if (unlikely(cpumask_empty(mask)))
> return 0;
>
> - switch (per_cpu(acfreq_data, cpumask_first(mask))->cpu_feature) {
> + switch (data->cpu_feature) {
> case SYSTEM_INTEL_MSR_CAPABLE:
> cmd.type = SYSTEM_INTEL_MSR_CAPABLE;
> cmd.addr.msr.reg = MSR_IA32_PERF_CTL;
> @@ -346,7 +345,7 @@ static u32 get_cur_val(const struct cpumask *mask)
> break;
> case SYSTEM_IO_CAPABLE:
> cmd.type = SYSTEM_IO_CAPABLE;
> - perf = per_cpu(acfreq_data, cpumask_first(mask))->acpi_data;
> + perf = data->acpi_data;
> cmd.addr.io.port = perf->control_register.address;
> cmd.addr.io.bit_width = perf->control_register.bit_width;
> break;
> @@ -364,19 +363,26 @@ static u32 get_cur_val(const struct cpumask *mask)
>
> static unsigned int get_cur_freq_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> - struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = per_cpu(acfreq_data, cpu);
> + struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data;
> + struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
> unsigned int freq;
> unsigned int cached_freq;
>
> pr_debug("get_cur_freq_on_cpu (%d)\n", cpu);
>
> + policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
> + if (unlikely(!policy))
> + return 0;
> +
> + data = policy->driver_data;
Do
+ cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
right here. No need of doing this towards the end.
> if (unlikely(data == NULL ||
> data->acpi_data == NULL || data->freq_table == NULL)) {
Maybe this if you like:
if (unlikely(! data || !data->acpi_data || !data->freq_table))
return 0;
> + cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
> return 0;
> }
>
> cached_freq = data->freq_table[data->acpi_data->state].frequency;
And this freq_table thing gives you opportunity to write another
patch :)
policy already have: policy->freq_table :)
> - freq = extract_freq(get_cur_val(cpumask_of(cpu)), data);
> + freq = extract_freq(get_cur_val(cpumask_of(cpu), data), data);
> if (freq != cached_freq) {
> /*
> * The dreaded BIOS frequency change behind our back.
> @@ -385,6 +391,8 @@ static unsigned int get_cur_freq_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
> data->resume = 1;
> }
>
> + cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
> +
> pr_debug("cur freq = %u\n", freq);
>
> return freq;
> @@ -397,7 +405,7 @@ static unsigned int check_freqs(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int freq,
> unsigned int i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
> - cur_freq = extract_freq(get_cur_val(mask), data);
> + cur_freq = extract_freq(get_cur_val(mask, data), data);
> if (cur_freq == freq)
> return 1;
> udelay(10);
> @@ -408,7 +416,7 @@ static unsigned int check_freqs(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int freq,
> static int acpi_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> unsigned int index)
> {
> - struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = per_cpu(acfreq_data, policy->cpu);
> + struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = policy->driver_data;
> struct acpi_processor_performance *perf;
> struct drv_cmd cmd;
> unsigned int next_perf_state = 0; /* Index into perf table */
> @@ -673,7 +681,7 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> }
>
> data->acpi_data = per_cpu_ptr(acpi_perf_data, cpu);
> - per_cpu(acfreq_data, cpu) = data;
> + policy->driver_data = data;
>
> if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC))
> acpi_cpufreq_driver.flags |= CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS;
> @@ -843,19 +851,19 @@ err_free_mask:
> free_cpumask_var(data->freqdomain_cpus);
> err_free:
> kfree(data);
> - per_cpu(acfreq_data, cpu) = NULL;
> + policy->driver_data = NULL;
>
> return result;
> }
>
> static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> {
> - struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = per_cpu(acfreq_data, policy->cpu);
> + struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = policy->driver_data;
>
> pr_debug("acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit\n");
>
> if (data) {
> - per_cpu(acfreq_data, policy->cpu) = NULL;
> + policy->driver_data = NULL;
> acpi_processor_unregister_performance(data->acpi_data,
> policy->cpu);
> free_cpumask_var(data->freqdomain_cpus);
> @@ -868,7 +876,7 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>
> static int acpi_cpufreq_resume(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> {
> - struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = per_cpu(acfreq_data, policy->cpu);
> + struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = policy->driver_data;
>
> pr_debug("acpi_cpufreq_resume\n");
Rest looks fine.
--
viresh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] acpi-cpufreq: replace per_cpu with driver_data of policy
2015-07-07 10:45 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2015-07-07 12:02 ` Pan Xinhui
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Pan Xinhui @ 2015-07-07 12:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Viresh Kumar
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm, rjw, mnipxh@163.com,
yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com
hi, Viresh
thanks for your reply. :)
On 2015年07月07日 18:45, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 07-07-15, 18:29, Pan Xinhui wrote:
>>
>> Now policy has field of driver_data, we can use it to get rid of per_cpu
>> acpi_cpufreq_data.
>
> Instead:
> "Drivers can store their internal per-policy information in
> policy->driver_data, lets use it."
>
thanks.
>> we have benefits after this replacing. 1) memory saving. 2) policy is
>
> s/we/We
>
> Also these points can be kept in separate lines :)
>
agree, thanks for pointing out it.
>> shared by several cpus, per_cpu seems not correct. useing *driver_data*
>
> using
>
>> is more reasonable. 3) fix a memory leak in acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit.
>
> Not just that. You are also fixing NULL pointer dereferences if wrong
> or uninitialized per-cpu data is used, because of a recent hotplug of
> policy->cpu.
>
acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit has if (data) check.
In past days, I believed in that all per_cpu is initialized to NULL by default, like global variables.
>> as
>> policy->cpu might change after cpu hotplug. So sometimes we cant't free
>> *data*, use *driver_data* to fix it. 4) fix a zero return value of
>> get_cur_freq_on_cpu. Only per_cpu(policy->cpu) is set to *data*, if we
>> try to get cpufreq on other cpus, we get zero instead of correct values.
>> Use *driver_data* to fix it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhuix.pan@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
>> index 0136dfc..7f662dd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
>> @@ -72,8 +72,6 @@ struct acpi_cpufreq_data {
>> cpumask_var_t freqdomain_cpus;
>> };
>>
>> -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct acpi_cpufreq_data *, acfreq_data);
>> -
>> /* acpi_perf_data is a pointer to percpu data. */
>> static struct acpi_processor_performance __percpu *acpi_perf_data;
>>
>> @@ -144,7 +142,7 @@ static int _store_boost(int val)
>>
>> static ssize_t show_freqdomain_cpus(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf)
>> {
>> - struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = per_cpu(acfreq_data, policy->cpu);
>> + struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = policy->driver_data;
>>
>> return cpufreq_show_cpus(data->freqdomain_cpus, buf);
>> }
>> @@ -327,7 +325,8 @@ static void drv_write(struct drv_cmd *cmd)
>> put_cpu();
>> }
>>
>> -static u32 get_cur_val(const struct cpumask *mask)
>> +static u32 get_cur_val(const struct cpumask *mask,
>> + struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data)
>
> Run checkpatch --strict to see some alignment warnings here..
>
yes, confused..
Let me have a check.
>> {
>> struct acpi_processor_performance *perf;
>> struct drv_cmd cmd;
>> @@ -335,7 +334,7 @@ static u32 get_cur_val(const struct cpumask *mask)
>> if (unlikely(cpumask_empty(mask)))
>> return 0;
>>
>> - switch (per_cpu(acfreq_data, cpumask_first(mask))->cpu_feature) {
>> + switch (data->cpu_feature) {
>> case SYSTEM_INTEL_MSR_CAPABLE:
>> cmd.type = SYSTEM_INTEL_MSR_CAPABLE;
>> cmd.addr.msr.reg = MSR_IA32_PERF_CTL;
>> @@ -346,7 +345,7 @@ static u32 get_cur_val(const struct cpumask *mask)
>> break;
>> case SYSTEM_IO_CAPABLE:
>> cmd.type = SYSTEM_IO_CAPABLE;
>> - perf = per_cpu(acfreq_data, cpumask_first(mask))->acpi_data;
>> + perf = data->acpi_data;
>> cmd.addr.io.port = perf->control_register.address;
>> cmd.addr.io.bit_width = perf->control_register.bit_width;
>> break;
>> @@ -364,19 +363,26 @@ static u32 get_cur_val(const struct cpumask *mask)
>>
>> static unsigned int get_cur_freq_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
>> {
>> - struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = per_cpu(acfreq_data, cpu);
>> + struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data;
>> + struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
>> unsigned int freq;
>> unsigned int cached_freq;
>>
>> pr_debug("get_cur_freq_on_cpu (%d)\n", cpu);
>>
>> + policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
>> + if (unlikely(!policy))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + data = policy->driver_data;
>
> Do
>
> + cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
>
> right here. No need of doing this towards the end.
>
agree
thanks
>> if (unlikely(data == NULL ||
>> data->acpi_data == NULL || data->freq_table == NULL)) {
>
> Maybe this if you like:
>
> if (unlikely(! data || !data->acpi_data || !data->freq_table))
> return 0;
>
Looks better
thanks
>> + cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> cached_freq = data->freq_table[data->acpi_data->state].frequency;
>
> And this freq_table thing gives you opportunity to write another
> patch :)
>
> policy already have: policy->freq_table :)
>
Yes, upstream codes changes much.
These changes really help us. thanks for your hard work. :)
>> - freq = extract_freq(get_cur_val(cpumask_of(cpu)), data);
>> + freq = extract_freq(get_cur_val(cpumask_of(cpu), data), data);
>> if (freq != cached_freq) {
>> /*
>> * The dreaded BIOS frequency change behind our back.
>> @@ -385,6 +391,8 @@ static unsigned int get_cur_freq_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
>> data->resume = 1;
>> }
>>
>> + cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
>> +
>> pr_debug("cur freq = %u\n", freq);
>>
>> return freq;
>> @@ -397,7 +405,7 @@ static unsigned int check_freqs(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int freq,
>> unsigned int i;
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
>> - cur_freq = extract_freq(get_cur_val(mask), data);
>> + cur_freq = extract_freq(get_cur_val(mask, data), data);
>> if (cur_freq == freq)
>> return 1;
>> udelay(10);
>> @@ -408,7 +416,7 @@ static unsigned int check_freqs(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int freq,
>> static int acpi_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>> unsigned int index)
>> {
>> - struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = per_cpu(acfreq_data, policy->cpu);
>> + struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = policy->driver_data;
>> struct acpi_processor_performance *perf;
>> struct drv_cmd cmd;
>> unsigned int next_perf_state = 0; /* Index into perf table */
>> @@ -673,7 +681,7 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>> }
>>
>> data->acpi_data = per_cpu_ptr(acpi_perf_data, cpu);
>> - per_cpu(acfreq_data, cpu) = data;
>> + policy->driver_data = data;
>>
>> if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC))
>> acpi_cpufreq_driver.flags |= CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS;
>> @@ -843,19 +851,19 @@ err_free_mask:
>> free_cpumask_var(data->freqdomain_cpus);
>> err_free:
>> kfree(data);
>> - per_cpu(acfreq_data, cpu) = NULL;
>> + policy->driver_data = NULL;
>>
>> return result;
>> }
>>
>> static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>> {
>> - struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = per_cpu(acfreq_data, policy->cpu);
>> + struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = policy->driver_data;
>>
>> pr_debug("acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit\n");
>>
>> if (data) {
>> - per_cpu(acfreq_data, policy->cpu) = NULL;
>> + policy->driver_data = NULL;
>> acpi_processor_unregister_performance(data->acpi_data,
>> policy->cpu);
>> free_cpumask_var(data->freqdomain_cpus);
>> @@ -868,7 +876,7 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>>
>> static int acpi_cpufreq_resume(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>> {
>> - struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = per_cpu(acfreq_data, policy->cpu);
>> + struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = policy->driver_data;
>>
>> pr_debug("acpi_cpufreq_resume\n");
>
> Rest looks fine.
>
thanks
xinhui
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-07-07 12:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-07-07 10:29 [PATCH] acpi-cpufreq: replace per_cpu with driver_data of policy Pan Xinhui
2015-07-07 10:45 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-07 12:02 ` Pan Xinhui
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).